7
edits
Changes
m
[[Image:Sem2.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=Seminar I|rightRightPrevText=Seminar I|'''Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse.''']]RightNextLink=Seminar III|RightNextText=Seminar III}}
* {| align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|-| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | 1954 - 1955| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[Seminar II]]| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''[[Seminar II|Le Séminaire. Livre II. <small>Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse, 1954-55</small>]]''. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Paris: Seuil, 1978 ["<BR><big>[[Seminar II|The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55]]." Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988].</big>|}
This <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">[[Consciousness]] is [[transparent]] to itself, whereas the I (<i>je</i>) or '[[ego]]' is not. The I is outside the field of consciousness and its [[seminarcertainties]] contains (where we [[Lacanrepresent]]ourselves as ego, where something exists and is expressed by the I). But it is not enough to say that 's early formulations the I of the [[symbolic orderunconscious]] is not the ego' since we tend to think this I as the true ego. [[Lacan]] proceeds to re-assert the locus of the ego and reinstate the [[signifying chain|circuitexcentricity]] of the [[discoursesubject]]vis-à-vis the ego. </span>
This <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">However, for a [[seminarconsciousness]] also contains an early short version to perceive [[another]] consciousness, the [[symbolic order]] must intervene on the system determined by the image of ''the ego, as a dimension of <i>[[The Purloined Letterre-connaissance]]'' paper and some rather strange reflections on language and cybernetics</i>.</span>
He claims that <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">In [[Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter'|his analysis deals with ]] of Poe's <i>[[Purloined Letter]]</i>, [[resistancesLacan]]speaks of "an other beyond all subjectivity." The question concerns the "confrontation of the subject beyond the ego with the <i>Id</i>, the <i>quod</i> (what-is-it?) which seeks to come into being in analysis." </span>
He reviews three works by <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">"The purloined [[Freudletter]]: ‘’[[Beyond is synonymous with the Pleasure Principle]]’’original, on radical subject of the unconscious. The [[death instinctsymbol]]; ‘’is being [[Group Psychology displaced]] in its pure state: one cannot come into contact with without being caught in its play. There is nothing in destiny, or casualty, which can be defined as a function of existence. When the characters get hold of this letter, something gets hold of them and carries them along. At each stage of the Analysis symbolic transformation of the Ego]]’’; and ‘’letter, they will be defined by their position in relation to this radical object. This position is not fixed. As they enter into the [[The Ego and the Idnecessity]]’’peculiar to the letter, they each become functionally different to the essential reality of the letter.’’Consciousness’’ For each of them the letter is transparent to itselfthe unconscious, with all its consequences, whereas namely that at each point of the I (''je'') is notsymbolic circuit, each of them becomes someone else. "</span>
But it is not enough to say that "the I of the unconscious is not the ego" since we tend to think this I as the true ego[[Image:schemaL. gif|center]]
Lacan proceeds <span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">The <i>[[Schema L]]</i>, systematized in the <i>[[Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter'|Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter' (La lettre volée)]]</i> ([[Écrits]], 1966), is elaborated in this [[seminar]]. A four-term structure maps the Real, the Imaginary and the Symbolic as replacing the second Freudian topography: [[ego]] / <i>[[id]]</i> / [[superego]]. Two diagonals intersect, while the imaginary rapport links <i>a</i> (the ego) to <i>a'</i> (the [[other]]), the line going from <i>S</i> (the subject, the Freudian <i>[[id]]</i>) to <i>A</i> (the [[Other]]) is interrupted by the first one. The Other is difficult to re-assert define: it is the place of [[language]] where [[subjectivity]] is constituted; it is the locus place of primal speech linked to the [[egoFather]] and reinstate ; it is the excentricity place of the absolute Other, the [[mother]] in the [[demand]]. The Other makes the subject without him knowing it. With Lacan, in Freud's <i>[[Wo Es war, soll Ich werden]]</i>, <i>Es</i> is the subject. It knows him or doesn't. The further, more exacting insight, is It speaks or doesn't. At the [[end of analysis]] vis-à-vis , it is It who must be called on to speak, and to enter in relation with real Others. Where <i>S</i> was, there the ego<i>Ich</i> should be.</span>
When ==Related Documents=={| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"|Author(s)|Title|Publisher|Year|Pages|Language|Size|Extension| rowspan="1" |Mirrors|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|''<small>SUNY Series in the Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''<BR>Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud<BR><small>0791427803, 9780791427804</small>| State University of New York Press| 1996| 460<BR>[445]|English|3 Mb|pdf|[specular imagehttp://library1.org/_ads/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 2] the ego is recognized as such by the , [http://b-ok.cc/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2113769 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 5]|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''<BR>Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud<BR><small>0791427803, 9780791427804</small>| State University of New York Press| 1996| 445|English|7 Mb|pdf|[subjecthttp://library1.org/_ads/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 2], this image becomes self[http://b-consciousok.cc/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 3], [http://libgen. me/item/detail/id/2245094 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 5]|}
However, for a consciousness to perceive another consciousness, the French versions of [[symbolicJacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[orderSeminars]] must intervene on the system determined by the image of the ego, as a dimension of ‘’Source: http://ecole-lacanienne.net* [[re-connaissanceFile:Seminaire_02.pdf|Download]]’’<BR><pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_02.pdf</pdf><!--{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" In | width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|The Dream Seminar of IrmaJacques Lacan: Book II : The Ego in Freud's InjectionTheory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955 (Seminar of Jacques Lacan)]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]" the most tragic moment occurs in the confrontation with the ‘’Real’’. The ultimate Real, "something in front of which words stop Trans. [[Sylvana Tomaselli]]." "In the dream the unconscious is what is outside all of the subjects New York: W. The structure of the dream shows that the unconscious is not the ego of the dreamerW." "This subject outside the subject designates the whole structure of the dreamNorton & Company, 1991." "What is at stake in the function of the dream is beyond the ego Paperback, what in the subject is of the subject and not of the subjectLanguage: [[English]], that is the unconsciousISBN: 0393307093." In his analysis of Poe's ‘’<small><small>Buy it at [https://amzn.to/2FgWwET Amazon.com], [Purloined Letterhttp://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub-21/ Amazon.de]’’, Lacan speaks of "an other beyond all subjectivity[http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr]." </small></small>|}<BR>The question concerns the {| style="confrontation of the subject beyond the ego with the ‘’Id’’, the ‘’quod’’ (whatwidth:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-isalign:left; line-it?) which seeks to come into being in analysisheight:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | width="100%"The purloined letter is synonymous with the original| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, radical subject of the unconsciousLivre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. The symbol is being displaced in its pure state [[Paris]]: one cannot come into contact with without being caught in its playSeuil, 1977. There is nothing in destiny 374 pages, or casualtyLanguage: [[French]], which can be defined as a function of existenceISBN: 2020047276. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/ Amazon. When the characters get hold of this lettercom], something gets hold of them and carries them along[http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon. At each stage of the symbolic transformation of the letterca], they will be defined by their position in relation to this radical object[http://www. This position is not fixedamazon. As they enter into the necessity peculiar to the letterde/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], they each become functionally different to the essential reality of the letter[http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon. For each of them the letter is the unconscious, with all its consequences, namely that at each point of the symbolic circuit, each of them becomes someone elsefr]."</small></small>|}-->[[Category:Seminars]] When Jean Hyppolite asks[[Category: "What use does the Symbolic have?" Jacques Lacan answers: "The Symbolic, the Imaginary and the Real are useful in giving its meaning to a particularly pure symbolic experience, that of analysis." ]]
Since the symbolic dimension is the only dimension that [[cure]]s, "The symbolic order is simultaneously non-being and insisting to be, that is what Freud has in mind when he talks about the death instinct as being what is most fundamental: a symbolic order in travail, in the process of coming, insisting in being realised." [[Image:SchemaL.gif |center]] The ‘’[[Schema L]]’’, systematized in ‘’La lettre volée’’ (Écrits, 1966), is elaborated in this seminar. A four-term structure maps the [[Real]], the [[Imaginary]] and the [[Symbolic]] as replacing the second Freudian [[topography]]: [[ego]]/[[id]]/[[superego]]. Two diagonals intersect, while the imaginary rapport links ‘’a’’ (the ego) to ‘’a'’’ (the other), the line going from S (the subject, the Freudian ‘’id’’) to A (the Other) is interrupted by the first one. The [[Other]] is difficult to define: it is the place of [[language]] where [[subjectivity]] is constituted; it is the place of primal [[speech]] linked to the [[Father]]; it is the place of the absolute Other, the [[mother]] in the [[demand]]. The Other makes the subject without him knowing it. With Lacan in Freud's ‘’Wo Es war, soll Ich werden’’, ‘’Es’’ is the subject. It knows him or doesn't. The further, more exacting insight, is It speaks or doesn't. At the end of analysis, it is It who must be called on to speak, and to enter in relation with real Others. Where ‘’S’’ was, there the ‘’Ich’’ should be. =====Lectures=====* [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.01.13.pdf 13 janvier 1954]* [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.01.20.pdf 20 janvier 1954]* [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.01.27.pdf 27 janvier 1954]* [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.02.03.pdf 03 février 1954]] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.02.10.pdf 10 février 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.02.17.pdf 17 février 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.02.24.pdf 24 février 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.03.10.pdf 10 mars 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.03.17.pdf 17 mars 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.03.24.pdf 24 mars 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.03.31.pdf 31 mars 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.04.07.pdf 07 avril 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.05.05.pdf 05 mai 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.05.12.pdf 12 mai 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.05.19.pdf 19 mai 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.05.26.pdf 26 mai 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.06.02.pdf 02 juin 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.06.09.pdf 09 juin 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.06.16.pdf 16 juin 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.06.23.pdf 23 juin 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.06.30.pdf 30 juin 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireI/1954.07.07.pdf 07 juillet 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireII/1954.11.17.pdf 17 novembre 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireII/1954.12.01.pdf 01 décembre 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireII/1954.12.06.pdf 06 décembre 1954] * [http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net/stenos/seminaireII/1954.12.17.pdf 17 décembre 1954] [Category:Seminars][Category:Jacques Lacan][Category:Works] =====References=====Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyseFrench: (texte établi par Jacques-Alain Miller), Paris: Seuil, 1977.English: Book II: The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (edited by Jacques-Alain Miller), New York: Norton, 1988. =====See Also=====* [[Schema L]] [[Category:Works]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]][[Category:Sigmund Freud]]__NOTOC__ __NOAUTOLINKS__
Fixed hyperlink errors and other minor typos
[[Image:Sem.II.NB.jpg|border|right|300px]]<BR><BR><span style=====Book II"line-height:1.5em;font-size: The Ego 1.1em">[[Lacan]] deliberates on the distinction made in Freud's Theory his [[Seminar I|first seminar]] between [[discourse]] [[analysis]] and in the Technique [[analysis]] of Psychoanalysis==========Short Summary=====The the [[ego]], both in relation to psychoanalytical theory and practice. He claims that "[[analysis]] deals with [[Seminars|second seminarresistance]] is a study of s." He reviews three works by [[Freud]]'s '': <i>[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'' - a central text throughout </i>, on the [[death drive]]; <i>[[Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego]]</i>; and <i>[[LacanThe Ego and the Id]]'s career</i>. </span>
<span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">The ego is a particular [[Lacanobject]] explores within the notion [[experience]] of the subject, with a certain function: an [[repetitionimaginary]] one. When in the [[Freudspecular image]] the ego is recognized as such by the subject, this [[image]] becomes [[self-conscious]]. "The [[mirror stage]] is based on the rapport [relationship] between, on one hand, a certain level of tendencies which are experienced as [[disconnected]] and how , on the other, a [[subjectunity]] with which it is constituted within merged and paired. In this [[unity]] the subject knows itself as unity, but as an [[chainalienated]] of , [[significationvirtual]]one. "</span>
<span style=====Long Summary====="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">In "[[LacanThe Dream of Irma's Injection]] deliberates on " the distinction made most tragic moment occurs in his first seminar between the confrontation with the [[Seminar II|discourse analysisReal]] and - the ultimate Real, "something in front of which words stop." "In the [[Seminar II|analysis of the egodream]], both in relation to the unconscious is what is [[psychoanalytic theoryoutside]] and all of the subjects. The structure of the dream shows that the unconscious is not the ego of the dreamer." "This subject outside the subject designates the whole [[practicestructure]]of the dream." "What is at stake in the function of the dream is beyond the ego, what in the subject is of the subject and not of the subject, that is the unconscious. "</span>
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When [[Jean Hyppolite]] asks: "What use does the Symbolic have?" Lacan answers: "The I is outside Symbolic, the field of consciousness Imaginary and the Real are useful in giving its certainties (where we represent ourselves as ego[[meaning]] to a particularly pure symbolic experience, that of analysis." Since the symbolic dimension is the only dimension that [[cure]]s, where something exists "The symbolic order is simultaneously non-being and insisting to be, that is expressed by what [[Freud]] has in mind when he talks about the I)death instinct as being what is most fundamental: a symbolic order in travail, in the process of coming, insisting in being realized. "</span>
==English Translation=={| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"|Author(s)|Title|Publisher|Year|Pages|Language|Size|Extension| rowspan="1" |Mirrors|-|[[Jacques Lacan]], [[Jacques-Alain Miller]], Sylvana Tomaselli|''<small>[[The Seminar]] of [[egoJacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] is a particular object within </small>''<BR>[[The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the experience Technique of the subjectPsychoanalysis, 1954-1955 Book II]]<BR><small>0393307093, with a certain function9780393307092</small>|W.W. Norton & Co.|1991|300[349]|English|6 Mb|pdf|[http: an //library1.org/_ads/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 2], [imaginaryhttp://b-ok.cc/md5/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/390672 4] one, [http://bookfi. net/md5/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 5]|}
==French=={| class="The wikitable floatright" width="300px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right;margin-left:10px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="250px" style="padding-left:10px" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | PDF|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 17 novembre 1954| [https://mega.nz/#!eSZ0GYbL!yBnG06l3uVAzrV_E9rYeNUC23UYJfBiHa00W5DhRvII link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 1 décembre 1954| [mirror stagehttps://mega.nz/#!fGJykSLA!BOIQtYSkaqANqfQTmsNnndpzfyWclcokD4tW7X4pfBY link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 8 décembre 1954| [https://mega.nz/#!7PIy1AhB!_F8SwchqRLcfZzuj0LiKDe3621M4VzClg6CNKDoaJPU link] is based on the rapport between, on one hand, a certain level of tendencies which are experienced as disconnected and, on the other, a unity with which it is merged and paired|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 décembre 1954| [https://mega.nz/#!rPJi1SJY!wSIEIJZr-tLv3T_sTmasTRtw3LkBZihTcLVfQNXEQ-8 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12 janvier 1955| [https://mega. In this unity the subject knows itself as unity, but as an alienated, virtual onenz/#!vOQykYzY!YCY3P3y7aEn6QxYQbcWZkxa0jlUQHLlhtIHV2go7AN8 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19 janvier 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!LaZiAAjb!Z5W0UZBwn1CNqxRpkE8iJS5mWnOkr8jlqq38dtImW-M link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 26 janvier 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!6HIgACZT!RXY64IElbnTAnscXdjtv9BYh_0BbqO3-zYViOt64lFw link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 2 février 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!2DIWzSoB!S0fUwVPZbuUFFLNe7G1Rmjw4pJLUUmFOefbs3xz6VNU link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 9 février 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!yaBURKyK!Y0vqsiaStSsMP5kogoDVHrMOjIGy7fLgMY239AlxghY link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 16 février 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!zLBiRapB!fpdvVypvi3_V7BPZmtN2eVyoAGzku62R669pdTfy6hQ link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 2 mars 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!2KRiwIZQ!XTa9vEbGezDKhaKGQIJismPLxHidoA4H5GCruGprpbg link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 9 mars 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!XaZSTIKQ!T1L7uEhSsuBslaX2clQrMHxQXMeyRWlSD9duoiJsMWU link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 16 mars 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!yKQ2nKaa!eNeJQEHR6BE12t77b_EHeyCZ5zxmtXgAUjYfR4VLr54 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 30 mars 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!3eRylK5K!kiHS-Om7-WZnJouboD70sp4CGzn0htpynJOHvzOoD90 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12 mai 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!mbJkAaKL!G3mtfqT57gH-apn2OXTxaCAjaXPz7hUQN7O59v9vXA4 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19 mai 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!GWQ0SKaY!pSMbDtVJHTuqaI02aOvK6SZwUwsg-mXMPkv7JEeWteI link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 25 mai 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!iSRkzYba!k3u6ZZBHma7eSoK2zQPefQkD1cZs8kC4rkPPYRoAIeQ link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 1 juin 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!2eYmCK6B!EiYL5hICKgE2TdEsGfeuT8Q4rvgikKmpGEnJN7TaA-M link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 8 juin 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!bWIU1YTD!jiN4PFEZPUg0PNrsQYJivaEdci6NaI4CX9nnY12qgJI link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 juin 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!bbBE3YRC!Ues3-Gxl5lvE8YfssB8o_gugH_DTarh-S71ARNX4l5Y link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 22 juin 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!bPRyUAJI!vtKOTZjVlmvdV66gVpKKvs6Kw3egOEnUyCuYKfcnxws link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 29 juin 1955| [https://mega.nz/#!XKIEGQCD!Cxbi7an0CLFIk4DfU0HH3JSzbMw4Awjdnfd3OULsor0 link]|}
