7
edits
Changes
m
[[Image:Sem2.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=Seminar I|rightRightPrevText=Seminar I|'''Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse.''']]RightNextLink=Seminar III|RightNextText=Seminar III}}
Book {| align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|-| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | 1954 - 1955| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[Seminar II]]| style="width:300px;text-align: left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''[[Seminar II|<small>Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse</small>]]''<BR><big>[[Seminar II|The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis.]]</big>|}
Le séminaire, Livre [[Image:Sem.II.NB.jpg|border|right|300px]]<BR><BR><span style="line-height: Le moi dans la théorie de 1.5em;font-size:1.1em">[[Lacan]] deliberates on the distinction made in his [[Seminar I|first seminar]] between [[discourse]] [[analysis]] and the [[analysis]] of the [[ego]], both in relation to psychoanalytical theory and practice. He claims that "[[analysis]] deals with [[resistance]]s." He reviews three works by [[Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]: <i>[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]</i>, on the [[death drive]]; <i>[[Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego]]</i>; and <i>[[The Ego and the Id]]</i>.</span>
1954<span style="line-1955height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">[[Consciousness]] is [[transparent]] to itself, whereas the I (<i>je</i>) or '[[ego]]' is not. The I is outside the field of consciousness and its [[certainties]] (where we [[represent]] ourselves as ego, where something exists and is expressed by the I). But it is not enough to say that 'the I of the [[unconscious]] is not the ego' since we tend to think this I as the true ego. [[Lacan]] proceeds to re-assert the locus of the ego and reinstate the [[excentricity]] of the [[subject]] vis-à-vis the ego.</span>
He reviews three works by <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">However, for a [[Freudconsciousness]]: ‘’to perceive [[Beyond the Pleasure Principleanother]]’’consciousness, on the [[death instinctsymbolic order]]; ‘’[[Group Psychology and must intervene on the system determined by the Analysis image of the Ego]]’’; and ‘’ego, as a dimension of <i>[[The Ego and the Idre-connaissance]]’’.’’Consciousness’’ is transparent to itself, whereas the I (je) is not</i>. </span>
But it is not enough to say that <span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">In [[Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter'|his analysis]] of Poe's <i>[[Purloined Letter]]</i>, [[Lacan]] speaks of "an other beyond all subjectivity." The question concerns the I "confrontation of the unconscious is not subject beyond the ego" since we tend with the <i>Id</i>, the <i>quod</i> (what-is-it?) which seeks to think this I as the true egocome into being in analysis. "</span>
Lacan proceeds to re<span style="line-height:1.5em;font-assert size:1.1em">"The purloined [[letter]] is synonymous with the locus original, radical subject of the unconscious. The [[egosymbol]] is being [[displaced]] in its pure state: one cannot come into contact with without being caught in its play. There is nothing in destiny, or casualty, which can be defined as a function of existence. When the characters get hold of this letter, something gets hold of them and reinstate carries them along. At each stage of the excentricity symbolic transformation of the letter, they will be defined by their position in relation to this radical object. This position is not fixed. As they enter into the [[subjectnecessity]] vis-à-vis peculiar to the letter, they each become functionally different to the essential reality of the letter. For each of them the letter is the unconscious, with all its consequences, namely that at each point of the egosymbolic circuit, each of them becomes someone else."</span>
When in the [[specular image]] the ego is recognized as such by the [[subjectImage:schemaL.gif|center]], this image becomes self-conscious.
However==English Translation=={| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"|Author(s)|Title|Publisher|Year|Pages|Language|Size|Extension| rowspan="1" |Mirrors|-|[[Jacques Lacan]], for a consciousness to perceive another consciousness[[Jacques-Alain Miller]], the Sylvana Tomaselli|''<small>[[symbolicThe Seminar]] of [[orderJacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] must intervene on </small>''<BR>[[The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the system determined by the image Technique of the egoPsychoanalysis, 1954-1955 Book II]]<BR><small>0393307093, 9780393307092</small>|W.W. Norton & Co.|1991|300[349]|English|6 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 1], as a dimension of ‘’[http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 2], [rehttp://b-connaissanceok.cc/md5/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/390672 4]’’, [http://bookfi.net/md5/C26EEC24E12D3C42A3933582395E9D3B 5]|}
In "[[The Dream of Irma's Injection]]" the most tragic moment occurs in the confrontation with the ‘’Real’’. The ultimate Real, "something in front of which words stop." "In the dream the unconscious is what is outside all of the subjects. The structure of the dream shows that the unconscious is not the ego of the dreamer." "This subject outside the subject designates the whole structure of the dream." "What is at stake in the function of the dream is beyond the ego, what in the subject is of the subject and not of the subject, that is the unconscious." In his analysis of Poe's ‘’[[Purloined Letter]]’’, Lacan speaks of "an other beyond all subjectivity." The question concerns the "confrontation of the subject beyond the ego with the ‘’Id’’, the ‘’quod’’ (what-is-it?) which seeks to come into being in analysis." "The purloined letter is synonymous with the original, radical subject of the unconscious. The symbol is being displaced in its pure state: one cannot come into contact with without being caught in its play. There is nothing in destiny, or casualty, which can be defined as a function of existence. When the characters get hold of this letter, something gets hold of them and carries them along. At each stage of the symbolic transformation of the letter, they will be defined by their position in relation to this radical object. This position is not fixed. As they enter into the necessity peculiar to the letter, they each become functionally different to the essential reality of the letter. For each of them the letter is the unconscious, with all its consequences, namely that at each point of the symbolic circuit, each of them becomes someone else." When Jean Hyppolite asks: "What use does the Symbolic have?" Lacan answers: "The Symbolic, the Imaginary and the Real are useful in giving its meaning to a particularly pure symbolic experience, that of analysis." Since the symbolic dimension is the only dimension that [[cure]]s, "The symbolic order is simultaneously non-being and insisting to be, that is what Freud has in mind when he talks about the death instinct as being what is most fundamental: a symbolic order in travail, in the process of coming, insisting in being realised." [[Image:SchemaL.gif |center]] The ‘’[[Schema L]]’’, systematized in ‘’La lettre volée’’ (Écrits, 1966), is elaborated in this seminar. A four-term structure maps the [[Real]], the [[Imaginary]] and the [[Symbolic]] as replacing the second Freudian [[topography]]: [[ego]]/[[id]]/[[superego]]. Two diagonals intersect, while the imaginary rapport links ‘’a’’ (the ego) to ‘’a'’’ (the other), the line going from S (the subject, the Freudian ‘’id’’) to A (the Other) is interrupted by the first one. The [[Other]] is difficult to define: it is the place of [[language]] where [[subjectivity]] is constituted; it is the place of primal [[speech]] linked to the [[Father]]; it is the place of the absolute Other, the [[mother]] in the [[demand]]. The Other makes the subject without him knowing it. With Lacan in Freud's ‘’Wo Es war, soll Ich werden’’, ‘’Es’’ is the subject. It knows him or doesn't. The further, more exacting insight, is It speaks or doesn't. At the end of analysis, it is It who must be called on to speak, and to enter in relation with real Others. Where ‘’S’’ was, there the ‘’Ich’’ should be. ==References ==Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyseFrench: (texte établi par Jacques-Alain Miller), Paris: Seuil, 1977.English: Book II: The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (edited by Jacques-Alain Miller), New York: Norton, 1988. == See Also ==‘’[[Schema L]]’’ [[Category:Seminars]][[Category:Lacan]][[Category:Freud]]__NOTOC__ __NOAUTOLINKS__
Fixed hyperlink errors and other minor typos
<span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">The ego is a particular [[object]] within the [[Lacanexperience]] deliberates on of the distinction made in his first seminar between subject, with a certain function: an [[discourse analysisimaginary]] and one. When in the [[analysis of specular image]] the egois recognized as such by the subject, this [[image]] becomes [[self-conscious]]. "The [[mirror stage]]is based on the rapport [relationship]between, on one hand, both in relation to a certain level of tendencies which are experienced as [[psychoanalytical theorydisconnected]] and , on the other, a [[practiceunity]]with which it is merged and paired. He claims that "analysis deals with In this [[unity]] the subject knows itself as unity, but as an [[alienated]], [[resistancesvirtual]]one." </span>
<span style="line-height:1.5em;font-size:1.1em">In "[[The I Dream of Irma's Injection]]" the most tragic moment occurs in the confrontation with the [[Real]] - the ultimate Real, "something in front of which words stop." "In the [[dream]] the unconscious is what is [[outside]] all of the subjects. The structure of the dream shows that the unconscious is not the ego of the dreamer." "This subject outside the field subject designates the whole [[structure]] of the dream." "What is at stake in the function of consciousness and its certainties (where we represent ourselves as the dream is beyond the ego, where something exists what in the subject is of the subject and not of the subject, that is expressed by the I)unconscious. "</span>
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When [[Jean Hyppolite]] asks: "What use does the Symbolic have?" Lacan answers: "The Symbolic, the Imaginary and the Real are useful in giving its [[egomeaning]] is to a particular object within the particularly pure symbolic experience , that of analysis." Since the symbolic dimension is the subjectonly dimension that [[cure]]s, with a certain function: an "The symbolic order is simultaneously non-being and insisting to be, that is what [[imaginaryFreud]] onehas in mind when he talks about the death instinct as being what is most fundamental: a symbolic order in travail, in the process of coming, insisting in being realized. "</span>
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">The <i>[[Schema L]]</i>, systematized in the <i>[[Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter'|Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter' (La lettre volée)]]</i> ([[mirror stageÉcrits]] , 1966), is based on elaborated in this [[seminar]]. A four-term structure maps the rapport betweenReal, on one handthe Imaginary and the Symbolic as replacing the second Freudian topography: [[ego]] / <i>[[id]]</i> / [[superego]]. Two diagonals intersect, while the imaginary rapport links <i>a</i> (the ego) to <i>a certain level of tendencies which are experienced as disconnected and'</i> (the [[other]]), on the otherline going from <i>S</i> (the subject, a unity with which the Freudian <i>[[id]]</i>) to <i>A</i> (the [[Other]]) is interrupted by the first one. The Other is difficult to define: it is the place of [[language]] where [[subjectivity]] is constituted; it is the place of primal speech linked to the [[Father]]; it is merged and pairedthe place of the absolute Other, the [[mother]] in the [[demand]]. The Other makes the subject without him knowing it. In this unity With Lacan, in Freud's <i>[[Wo Es war, soll Ich werden]]</i>, <i>Es</i> is the subject . It knows itself as unityhim or doesn't. The further, more exacting insight, is It speaks or doesn't. At the [[end of analysis]], it is It who must be called on to speak, but as an alienatedand to enter in relation with real Others. Where <i>S</i> was, virtual onethere the <i>Ich</i> should be."</span>
==Related Documents==
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
|Author(s)
|Title
|Publisher
|Year
|Pages
|Language
|Size
|Extension
| rowspan="1" |Mirrors
|-
|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus
|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''<BR>Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud<BR><small>0791427803, 9780791427804</small>
| State University of New York Press
| 1996
| 460<BR>[445]
|English
|3 Mb
|pdf
|[http://library1.org/_ads/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2113769 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 5]
|-
|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus
|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''<BR>Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud<BR><small>0791427803, 9780791427804</small>
| State University of New York Press
| 1996
| 445
|English
|7 Mb
|pdf
|[http://library1.org/_ads/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2245094 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 5]
|}
==French==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="300px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right;margin-left:10px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="250px" style="padding-left:10px" | Date
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | PDF
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 17 novembre 1954
| [https://mega.nz/#!eSZ0GYbL!yBnG06l3uVAzrV_E9rYeNUC23UYJfBiHa00W5DhRvII link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 1 décembre 1954
| [https://mega.nz/#!fGJykSLA!BOIQtYSkaqANqfQTmsNnndpzfyWclcokD4tW7X4pfBY link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 8 décembre 1954
| [https://mega.nz/#!7PIy1AhB!_F8SwchqRLcfZzuj0LiKDe3621M4VzClg6CNKDoaJPU link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 décembre 1954
| [https://mega.nz/#!rPJi1SJY!wSIEIJZr-tLv3T_sTmasTRtw3LkBZihTcLVfQNXEQ-8 link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12 janvier 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!vOQykYzY!YCY3P3y7aEn6QxYQbcWZkxa0jlUQHLlhtIHV2go7AN8 link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19 janvier 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!LaZiAAjb!Z5W0UZBwn1CNqxRpkE8iJS5mWnOkr8jlqq38dtImW-M link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 26 janvier 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!6HIgACZT!RXY64IElbnTAnscXdjtv9BYh_0BbqO3-zYViOt64lFw link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 2 février 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!2DIWzSoB!S0fUwVPZbuUFFLNe7G1Rmjw4pJLUUmFOefbs3xz6VNU link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 9 février 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!yaBURKyK!Y0vqsiaStSsMP5kogoDVHrMOjIGy7fLgMY239AlxghY link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 16 février 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!zLBiRapB!fpdvVypvi3_V7BPZmtN2eVyoAGzku62R669pdTfy6hQ link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 2 mars 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!2KRiwIZQ!XTa9vEbGezDKhaKGQIJismPLxHidoA4H5GCruGprpbg link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 9 mars 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!XaZSTIKQ!T1L7uEhSsuBslaX2clQrMHxQXMeyRWlSD9duoiJsMWU link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 16 mars 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!yKQ2nKaa!eNeJQEHR6BE12t77b_EHeyCZ5zxmtXgAUjYfR4VLr54 link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 30 mars 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!3eRylK5K!kiHS-Om7-WZnJouboD70sp4CGzn0htpynJOHvzOoD90 link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12 mai 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!mbJkAaKL!G3mtfqT57gH-apn2OXTxaCAjaXPz7hUQN7O59v9vXA4 link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19 mai 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!GWQ0SKaY!pSMbDtVJHTuqaI02aOvK6SZwUwsg-mXMPkv7JEeWteI link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 25 mai 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!iSRkzYba!k3u6ZZBHma7eSoK2zQPefQkD1cZs8kC4rkPPYRoAIeQ link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 1 juin 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!2eYmCK6B!EiYL5hICKgE2TdEsGfeuT8Q4rvgikKmpGEnJN7TaA-M link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 8 juin 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!bWIU1YTD!jiN4PFEZPUg0PNrsQYJivaEdci6NaI4CX9nnY12qgJI link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 juin 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!bbBE3YRC!Ues3-Gxl5lvE8YfssB8o_gugH_DTarh-S71ARNX4l5Y link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 22 juin 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!bPRyUAJI!vtKOTZjVlmvdV66gVpKKvs6Kw3egOEnUyCuYKfcnxws link]
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 29 juin 1955
| [https://mega.nz/#!XKIEGQCD!Cxbi7an0CLFIk4DfU0HH3JSzbMw4Awjdnfd3OULsor0 link]
|}
French versions of [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[Seminars]] Source: http://ecole-lacanienne.net
* [[File:Seminaire_02.pdf|Download]]
<BR><pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_02.pdf</pdf>
<!--
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
| width="100%" | [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book II : The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955 (Seminar of Jacques Lacan)]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Trans. [[Sylvana Tomaselli]]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991. Paperback, Language: [[English]], ISBN: 0393307093. <small><small>Buy it at [https://amzn.to/2FgWwET Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small>
|}
<BR>
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
| width="100%" | [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1977. 374 pages, Language: [[French]], ISBN: 2020047276. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small>
|}
-->
[[Category:Seminars]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
