Changes

{{S}}[[Image:Sem5.jpgSeminarsNavBar|RightPrevLink=Seminar IV|RightPrevText=Seminar IV|300pxRightNextLink=Seminar VI|right]]{{VRightNextText=Seminar VI}} {| class="wikitable" width="250px" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" align="center" bgcolorstyle="width:600px; border:1px solid #ffffff" style="aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:30px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center10px;"

| bgcolorstyle="#ffffff" width="200px" style=":100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[{{Y}}|Date]]1957 - 1958| bgcolorstyle="#ffffff" width="50px" style=":100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[{{Y}}|PDFSeminar V]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:15px10px;" | ''[[Seminar V|Les formations de l'inconscient]]''<BR><big>[[{{Y}}Seminar V|06 novembre 1957The Formations of the Unconscious]]</big>| }  [[httpImage://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11Sem.06V.pdf link]jpg|-border| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" 300px| right]]The [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] are those circumstances in which the [[{{Y}}|13 novembre 1957law]]| s of the [[httpunconscious]] are most discernible://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957the [[joke]], the [[dream]], the [[symptom]], the [[lapsus]] ([[parapraxis]]).11 [[Freud]] referred to the fundamental mechanisms involved in the [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] as [[condensation]] and [[displacement]], which [[Lacan]] redefines as [[metaphor]] and [[metonymy]].13With the former, the play of [[signifier]]s creates [[sense]] in nonsense in relation to [[truth]].pdf link The latter reveals the [[lack]] of a [[word]]|-| bgcolor=, "#ffffffan item of waste sent like a ball between [[code]] and [[message]]." style= In this [[lack]] [[substitute]] [[word]]s appear and function like "padding-left:15pxthe [[metonymic]] ruins of the [[object]]." |  At the junction between [[psychoanalysis]] and [[linguistics]], [[Lacan]] wants to [[formalize]] the primordial [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]] that [[Freud]] had uncovered. His [[project]] is to define a [[topology]] of the levels of functioning of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the [[{{Y}}|20 novembre 1957graph]]s that, under the generic [[name]] of [[Graph of Desire]], will be at the core of "[[The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]]| " written in 1960 and published in 1966 in <i>[[http://{{archive}}Écrits]]</seminaireV/1957i>.11 Here the key [[concept]] is that of [[desire]], and [[Lacan]]'s [[dialectic]] of [[desire]] is quite distinct from [[Hegel]]'s.20 The Graph of Desire will serve as a [[topology]] of the different steps constitutive of the [[subject]].pdf link]|-| bgcolor= "#ffffffIt is precisely because desire is articulated that it is not articulable" style=in a [[signifying chain]]. [[Slavoj Zizek]] commenting on this formulation argues that [[subject]] is not substance, "padding-left:15px" | it has not substantial positive [[being]] in itself, being caught between 'not yet' and 'no longer'. The [[{{Y}}|27 novembre 1957subject]] | never is, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here, since there is only a trace of its [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957absence]].11.27.pdf link]"|-| bgcolor=The [[subject]] is dependent on the [[recognition]] of the [[Other]] who embodies "#ffffffthe legitimacy of the code," style="padding-left:15px" | he alone can ratify a word as a [[joke]], as stupidity or as [[madness]]. With the [[Other]], [[Lacan]] moves on to the [[analysis]] of the [[Oedipus complex]]. [[{{Y}}|04 décembre 1957Three]] [[stages]] [[structure]] the [[constitution]]| of the [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957subject]].12 First, the [[paternal metaphor]] [[acts]] intrinsically on account of the primacy given to the [[phallus]] by [[culture]].04.pdf linkThen, the father intervenes as the one who deprives the [[mother]]: to her he addresses the [[message]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffffYou will not reintegrate your product" style="padding-left:15px" | the [[child]] as [[{{Y}}|11 décembre 1957phallic]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957[object]].12.11.pdf linkThe [[child]]|-| bgcolor=receives "#ffffffa [[message]] on the [[message]]," style=in the [[form]] of "padding-left:15pxYou will not [[sleep]] with your mother" | that liberates and deprives him of the object of his [[{{Y}}|18 décembre 1957desire]]| . From the alternative "To be or not to be the [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.18.pdf linkphallus]]|-| bgcolor=,"#ffffffhe can move to the alternative " style="padding-left:15pxTo have it or not to have it." | The [[{{Y}}|08 janvier 1958third]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.08.pdf link[moment]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="paddingthe exit out of the [[Oedipus complex]] -left:15px" | requires the [[intervention]] of the permissive and generous father who, preferred over the [[mother]], gives [[birth]] to the [[idea]] of the [[ego]]. It is in this context that the problems of becoming boy or [[{{Y}}|15 janvier 1958girl]] | - of the inverted [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.15Oedipus complex]] are raised.pdf link]|-| bgcolor=[[Lacan]] plays with the term "#ffffff[[insistence]]" style=in [[order]] to [[recall]] [[repetition]], the characteristic of the [[signifying chain]] in the [[unconscious]]. "padding-left:15px" | The unconscious is neither primordial nor [[instinctual]]; what it [[{{Y}}|22 janvier 1958knows]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958[about]] the elementary is but the elements of the signifier.01.22.pdf link" In a previous [[writing]]|-| bgcolor=, "#ffffff[[The Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since Freud]]," style="paddinghe defines the unconscious as a [[memory]] that can be compared to that of modern [[thinking]]-left:15px" | machines where the chain that insists on reproducing itself in the [[transference]] can be found, and which is the [[chain]] of [[{{Y}}|29 janvier 1958dead]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.29[desire]].pdf link]|-| bgcolor=In "#ffffff[[The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]]," style=written in 1960, [[Lacan]] states that "padding-left:15px" | it is not the law that bars the [[{{Y}}|05 février 1958subject]] | 's access to <i>[[http:jouissance]]<//{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958i> but [[pleasure]].02.05.pdf link" In 1966 he will add a final [[sentence]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 février 1958Castration]] | means that <i>[[http:jouissance]]</i> must be refused, so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder (<i>échelle inversée</{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958i>) of the [[Law]] of [[desire]].02.12.pdf link]"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | The [[{{Y}}|05 mars 1958signification]]| of the phallus" (<i>[[httpÉcrits:A Selection]]</i>) is a lecture given at the Max Planck Institute in Munich in 1958. All the research accomplished during <i>La relation d'[[objet]]</{{archive}}i> and <i>Les [[formations]] de l'[[inconscient]]</seminaireVi> culminates here, and serves as an introduction to <i>Le [[désir]] et son [[interpretation]].</1958.03.05.pdf link]i><br>|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-leftThe alternative seems ineluctable:15px" | either the [[Mother]] or the [[Father]]. To choose the [[Mother]] means to be condemned to the dependency of [[demand]], while the [[{{Y}}|12 mars 1958Father]]| constitutes the access to [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958desire]], hence to salvation.03 If the [[Father]] must be preferred to the [[Mother]], if the [[Father]] is the origin and the [[representative]] of [[culture]] (and of the [[Law]]), it is because he possesses the [[phallus]] that he can give or refuse.12.pdf linkThe absolute primacy of the [[phallus]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="paddingthe single emblem of Man -lefthas become a [[real]] doctrinal (perhaps dogmatic) basis of [[Lacanian]] [[theory]]:15px" | The [[phallus]] is the [[signifier]] of [[signifier]]s, the privileged signifier of that mark in which the [[role]] of the [[{{Y}}|19 mars 1958logos]]| is joined with the advent of [[httpdesire]]," its function "touches on its most profound rapport:that in which the Ancients embodied the <i>Nous</i>, the [[Mind]], and the <i>Logos</{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958i>, [[discourse]], [[reason]].03.19.pdf link" Why such a privilege? "This [[signifier]] is chosen as the most tangible element in the real of [[sexual]] copulation; it is the most [[symbolic]]|-| bgcolor=in the literal sense," since "#ffffffit is equivalent to the [[logical]] copula." style= Moreover, "padding-left:15pxby virtue of its turgidity, it epitomizes the [[image]] of the vital flow as it is transmitted in generation." | [[{{Y}}|26 mars 1958Freud]] says, there is only one [[libido]], [[masculine]]| in [[http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958nature]].03.26.pdf link Later, [[Lacan]]|-| bgcolor=will assert that "#ffffff[[there is no such thing as sexual rapport]]," style="padding-left<i>[[il n'y a pas de rapport sexuel]]</i>, in the sense of proportion or relation:15px" | one sex counts for both [[sexes]]. Thus the [[{{Y}}|09 avril 1958phallus]] can only appear as veiled. | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.09.pdf link]|-== English =={| class="wikitable" width="100%" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:15px30px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;" | [[{{Y}}Author(s)|16 avril 1958]] Title| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.16.pdf link]Publisher|-Year| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}Pages|23 avril 1958]]Language| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.23.pdf link]Size|-Extension| bgcolor="#ffffff" stylecolspan="padding-left:15px5" | [[{{Y}}|30 avril 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.30.pdf link]Mirrors

| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|07 mai 1958Jacques Lacan]]|The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book 5Formations of the Unconscious|Polity Press|2017|529|English|32 Mb|pdf| [http://{{archive}}library1.org/_ads/seminaireV766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[1]</1958nowiki>], [http://libgen.05io/get.07php?md5=766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[2]</nowiki>], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[3]</nowiki>], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2215514 <nowiki>[4]</nowiki>], [http://bookfi.pdf linknet/md5/766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[5]</nowiki>]

| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|14 mai 1958Jacques Lacan]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/Formations of the Unconscious, V, 1957-1958.05.14.pdf link](The Seminar of Jacques Lacan)|-Polity| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" 2017| [[{{Y}}|21 mai 1958]]529| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.21.pdf link]English|-31 Mb| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|04 juin 1958]]pdf| [http://{{archive}}library1.org/seminaireV_ads/1958.06.04.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[{{Y}}|11 juin 19581]</nowiki>] | , [http://{{archive}}libgen.io/seminaireV/1958.06.11get.pdf link]|-| bgcolorphp?md5="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[[{{Y}}|18 juin 19582]</nowiki>]| , [http://{{archive}}b-ok.cc/seminaireVmd5/1958.06.18.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[{{Y}}|25 juin 19583]</nowiki>]| , [http://{{archive}}libgen.me/seminaireVitem/1958.06.25.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [detail/id/2307684 <nowiki>[{{Y}}|02 juillet 19584]</nowiki>]| , [http://{{archive}}bookfi.net/seminaireVmd5/8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[5]</1958.07.02.pdf linknowiki>]

<b>Le séminaire, Livre V: Les formations de [[l'inconscient]].</b><br>[[French]]: (texte établi par Jacques-[[Alain ]] [[Miller]]), [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1998.<br>[[English]]: unpublished.

The formations of the unconscious are those circumstances in which the laws of the unconscious are most discernible{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height: the joke, the dream, the symptom, the lapsus (parapraxis)2. Freud referred to the fundamental mechanisms involved in the formations of the unconscious as condensation and displacement, which 0em; padding-left:10px;"|width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan redefines as metaphor and metonymy. With the former, the play of signifiers creates sense in nonsense in relation to truthJacques]]. [[Seminar I|The latter reveals the lack of a word, "an item of waste sent like a ball between code and message." In this lack substitute words appear and function like "the metonymic ruins Seminar of the object."<br>At the junction between psychoanalysis and linguistics, Jacques Lacan wants to formalize the primordial laws of the unconscious that Freud had uncovered. His project is to define a topology of the levels of functioning of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the graphs that, under the generic name of Graph of Desire, will be at the core of ": Book II : The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire Ego in the Freudian Unconscious" written in 1960 Freud's Theory and published in 1966 in <i>Écrits</i>. Here the key concept is that Technique of desire, and Psychoanalysis 1954-1955 (Seminar of Jacques Lacan's dialectic of desire is quite distinct from Hegel's)]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Trans. [[Sylvana Tomaselli]]. The Graph of Desire will serve as a topology of the different steps constitutive of the subject New York: W. "It is precisely because desire is articulated that it is not articulable" in a signifying chainW. Slavoj Zizek commenting on this formulation argues that subject is not substance, "it has not substantial positive being in itselfNorton & Company, being caught between 'not yet' and 'no longer'1991. The subject never is Paperback, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here[[Language]]: English, since there is only a trace of its absenceISBN: 0393307093."<brsmall><small> The subject is dependent on the recognition of the Other who embodies "the legitimacy of the code," he alone can ratify a word as a joke, as stupidity or as madnessBuy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubject-20/ Amazon. With the Othercom], Lacan moves on to the analysis of the Oedipus complex[http://www. Three stages structure the constitution of the subjectamazon. First, the paternal metaphor acts intrinsically on account of the primacy given to the phallus by cultureca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub07-20/ Amazon. Thenca], the father intervenes as the one who deprives the mother[http: to her he addresses the message "You will not reintegrate your product" //www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub- the child as phallic object21/ Amazon. The child receives "a message on the messagede]," in the form of "You will not sleep with your mother" that liberates and deprives him of the object of his desire[http://www.amazon. From the alternative "To be or not to be the phallus," he can move to the alternative "To have it or not to have itco." The third moment uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubjencyofl- the exit out of the Oedipus complex - requires the intervention of the permissive and generous father who, preferred over the mother, gives birth to the idea of the ego21/ Amazon.co. It is in this context that the problems of becoming boy uk] or girl [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub04- of the inverted Oedipus complex are raised21/ Amazon.fr].<br/small></small>|}<BR>Lacan plays with the term {| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|width="insistence100%" in order to recall repetition| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, the characteristic of the signifying chain in the unconsciousJacques]]. "The unconscious is neither primordial nor instinctual; what it knows about the elementary is but the elements of the signifier." In a previous writing [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, "The Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud," he defines the unconscious as a memory that can be compared to that of modern thinkinget dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-machines where the chain that insists on reproducing itself in the transference can be foundAlain Miller]]. Paris: Seuil, and which is the chain of dead desire1977.<br>In "The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious 374 pages," written in 1960Language: French, Lacan states that "it is not the law that bars the subject's access to ISBN: 2020047276. <ismall>jouissance<small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/i> but pleasureAmazon." In 1966 he will add a final sentencecom], [http: "Castration means that <i>jouissance</i> must be refused, so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder (<i>échelle inversée</i>) of the Law of desirewww.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon." "The signification of the phallus" (<i>Écritsca], [http: A Selection</i>) is a lecture given at the Max Planck Institute in Munich in 1958/www.amazon. All the research accomplished during <i>La relation d'objet<de/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/i> and <i>Les formations Amazon.de l'inconscient<], [http:/i> culminates here, and serves as an introduction to <i>Le désir et son interpretation</i><br> The alternative seems ineluctable: either the Mother or the Fatherwww. To choose the Mother means to be condemned to the dependency of demand, while the Father constitutes the access to desire, hence to salvationamazon. If the Father must be preferred to the Mother, if the Father is the origin and the representative of culture (and of the Law), it is because he possesses the phallus that he can give or refuseco. The absolute primacy of the phallus uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl- the single emblem of Man - has become a real doctrinal (perhaps dogmatic) basis of Lacanian theory: "The phallus is the signifier of signifiers, the privileged signifier of that mark in which the role of the logos is joined with the advent of desire," its function "touches on its most profound rapport21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http: that in which the Ancients embodied the <i>Nous</i>, the Mind, and the <i>Logos</i>, discourse, reasonwww." Why such a privilege? "This signifier is chosen as the most tangible element in the real of sexual copulation; it is the most symbolic in the literal sense," since "it is equivalent to the logical copulaamazon." Moreover, "by virtue of its turgidity, it epitomizes the image of the vital flow as it is transmitted in generationfr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon." Freud says, there is only one libido, masculine in naturefr]. Later, Lacan will assert that "there is no such thing as sexual rapport," <i/small>il n'y a pas de rapport sexuel</ismall>, in the sense of proportion or relation|}-->__NOTOC__ __NOAUTOLINKS__[[Category: one sex counts for both sexes. Thus the phallus can only appear as veiled.Seminars]] __NOTOC__[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]