Changes

{{SeminarsSeminarsNavBar|RightPrevLink=Seminar IV|RightPrevText=Seminar IV|RightNextLink=Seminar VI|RightNextText=Seminar VI}}

{| stylealign="line-height:2.0em;width:100%;text-align:justify;border-spacing:8px;center"|style="width:100%600px;border:0px 1px solid #cccccc;background-color:#ffffffaaa;vertical-align:top"|{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justifyleft;verticalline-alignheight:top2.0em;backgroundpadding-colorleft:#ffffff10px;"

|style="width:100px;text-align:justifyleft; line-height:2.0em;colorpadding-left:#00010px;"| 1957 - 1958| style="width:100px;text-align:left;line-height:2.5em0em; padding-left:10px;"| [[Seminar V]]| style="width:300px;text-align:justifyleft; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|''[[Seminar V|Les formations de l'inconscient]]''<BR><big>[[Seminar V|The Formations of the Unconscious]]</big>{{|}  [[Image:Sem.V}}.jpg|border|300px|right]]The [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] are those circumstances in which the [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]] are most discernible: the [[joke]], the [[dream]], the [[symptom]], the [[lapsus]] ([[parapraxis]]). [[Freud]] referred to the fundamental mechanisms involved in the [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] as [[condensation]] and [[displacement]], which [[Lacan]] redefines as [[metaphor]] and [[metonymy]]. With the former, the play of [[signifier]]s creates [[sense]] in nonsense in relation to [[truth]]. The latter reveals the [[lack]] of a [[word]], "an item of waste sent like a ball between [[code]] and [[message]]." In this [[lack]] [[substitute]] [[word]]s appear and function like "the [[metonymic]] ruins of the [[object]]."

The At the junction between [[psychoanalysis]] and [[linguistics]], [[formationLacan]]s of the wants to [[unconsciousformalize]] are those circumstances in which the primordial [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]] are most discernible: the that [[Freud]] had uncovered. His [[jokeproject]], the is to define a [[dreamtopology]], of the levels of functioning of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the [[symptomgraph]]s that, under the generic [[lapsusname]] (of [[parapraxisGraph of Desire]]). , will be at the core of "[[Freud]] referred to The Subversion of the Subject and the fundamental mechanisms involved Dialectic of Desire in the [[formationFreudian Unconscious]]s of the " written in 1960 and published in 1966 in <i>[[unconsciousÉcrits]] as </i>. Here the key [[condensationconcept]] and is that of [[displacementdesire]], which and [[Lacan]] redefines as 's [[metaphordialectic]] and of [[metonymydesire]]. With the former, the play of is quite distinct from [[signifierHegel]]'s creates sense in nonsense in relation to [[truth]]. The latter reveals the Graph of Desire will serve as a [[lacktopology]] of a the different steps constitutive of the [[wordsubject]], . "It is precisely because desire is articulated that it is not articulable"an item of waste sent like in a ball between [[code]] and [[messagesignifying chain]]." In this [[lackSlavoj Zizek]] commenting on this formulation argues that [[substitutesubject]] is not substance, "it has not substantial positive [[wordbeing]]s appear in itself, being caught between 'not yet' and function like "the 'no longer'. The [[metonymicsubject]] ruins never is, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here, since there is only a trace of the its [[objectabsence]]."

At The [[subject]] is dependent on the junction between [[psychoanalysisrecognition]] and of the [[linguisticsOther]]who embodies "the legitimacy of the code, " he alone can ratify a word as a [[Lacanjoke]] wants to , as stupidity or as [[formalizemadness]] . With the primordial [[lawOther]], [[Lacan]]s of moves on to the [[unconsciousanalysis]] that of the [[FreudOedipus complex]] had uncovered. His project is to define a [[topologyThree]] [[stages]] [[structure]] of the levels of functioning [[constitution]] of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the [[graphsubject]]s that. First, under the generic name of [[Graph of Desirepaternal metaphor]], will be at the core of "[[The Subversion acts]] intrinsically on account of the Subject and primacy given to the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious[[phallus]]" written in 1960 and published in 1966 in <i>by [[Écritsculture]]</i>. Here Then, the father intervenes as the one who deprives the key concept is that of [[desiremother]], and : to her he addresses the [[Lacanmessage]]'s "You will not reintegrate your product" - the [[dialecticchild]] of as [[desirephallic]] is quite distinct from [[Hegelobject]]'s. The Graph [[child]] receives "a [[message]] on the [[message]]," in the [[form]] of Desire "You will serve as a not [[topologysleep]] with your mother" that liberates and deprives him of the different steps constitutive object of the his [[subjectdesire]]. From the alternative "To be or not to be the [[phallus]],"It is precisely because desire is articulated that he can move to the alternative "To have it is or not articulableto have it." in a The [[third]] [[signifying chainmoment]]. - the exit out of the [[Slavoj ZizekOedipus complex]] commenting on this formulation argues that - requires the [[subjectintervention]] is not substanceof the permissive and generous father who, "it has not substantial positive being in itselfpreferred over the [[mother]], being caught between 'not yet' and 'no longer'gives [[birth]] to the [[idea]] of the [[ego]]. The It is in this context that the problems of becoming boy or [[subjectgirl]] never is, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here, since there is only a trace of its absencethe inverted [[Oedipus complex]] are raised."

The [[subjectLacan]] is dependent on the recognition of plays with the term "[[Otherinsistence]] who embodies "the legitimacy of the code," he alone can ratify a word as a in [[jokeorder]], as stupidity or as madness. With the to [[Otherrecall]], [[Lacanrepetition]] moves on to , the [[analysis]] characteristic of the [[Oedipus complex]]. Three stages [[structuresignifying chain]] the constitution of in the [[subjectunconscious]]. First, the paternal metaphor acts intrinsically on account of the primacy given to the "The unconscious is neither primordial nor [[phallusinstinctual]] by ; what it [[cultureknows]]. Then, the father intervenes as the one who deprives the [[motherabout]]: to her he addresses the [[message]] "You will not reintegrate your product" - elementary is but the elements of the [[child]] as [[phallic]] [[object]]signifier. The " In a previous [[childwriting]] receives , "a [[message]] on The Agency of the Letter in the [[messageUnconscious or Reason since Freud]]," in he defines the form of "You will not sleep with your mother" that liberates and deprives him of the object of his unconscious as a [[desirememory]]. From the alternative "To that can be or not compared to be the that of modern [[phallusthinking]]," he can move to the alternative "To have it or not to have it." The third moment - machines where the exit out of chain that insists on reproducing itself in the [[Oedipus complextransference]] - requires the intervention of the permissive can be found, and generous father who, preferred over which is the [[motherchain]], gives birth to the idea of the [[egodead]]. It is in this context that the problems of becoming boy or girl - of the inverted [[Oedipus complexdesire]] are raised.

In "[[LacanThe Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]] plays with the term ,"written in 1960, [[insistenceLacan]]states that " in order to recall repetition, it is not the characteristic of law that bars the [[signifying chainsubject]] in the 's access to <i>[[unconsciousjouissance]]. "The unconscious is neither primordial nor instinctual; what it knows about the elementary is </i> but the elements of the signifier[[pleasure]]." In 1966 he will add a previous writing, final [[sentence]]: "[[The Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since FreudCastration]]," he defines the unconscious as a memory that can be compared to that of modern thinking-machines where the chain means that insists on reproducing itself in the <i>[[transferencejouissance]] </i> must be refused, so that it can be found, and which is reached on the inverted ladder (<i>échelle inversée</i>) of the [[chainLaw]] of [[dead]] [[desire]]."

In "The [[The Subversion signification]] of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]],phallus" written in 1960, (<i>[[LacanÉcrits: A Selection]] states that "it </i>) is not a lecture given at the law that bars Max Planck Institute in Munich in 1958. All the [[subject]]'s access to research accomplished during <i>La relation d'[[jouissanceobjet]]</i> but and <i>Les [[pleasureformations]]." In 1966 he will add a final sentence: "de l'[[Castration]] means that <i>[[jouissanceinconscient]]</i> must be refusedculminates here, so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder (and serves as an introduction to <i>échelle inversée</i>) of the Le [[Lawdésir]] of et son [[desireinterpretation]]."</i><br>

"The signification alternative seems ineluctable: either the [[Mother]] or the [[Father]]. To choose the [[Mother]] means to be condemned to the dependency of [[demand]], while the [[Father]] constitutes the access to [[desire]], hence to salvation. If the [[Father]] must be preferred to the [[Mother]], if the [[Father]] is the origin and the [[representative]] of [[culture]] (and of the [[Law]]), it is because he possesses the [[phallus]] that he can give or refuse. The absolute primacy of the [[phallus" ]] - the single emblem of Man - has become a [[real]] doctrinal (<i>Écritsperhaps dogmatic) basis of [[Lacanian]] [[theory]]: A Selection</i>) "The [[phallus]] is a lecture given at the Max Planck Institute [[signifier]] of [[signifier]]s, the privileged signifier of that mark in Munich which the [[role]] of the [[logos]] is joined with the advent of [[desire]]," its function "touches on its most profound rapport: that in 1958. All which the Ancients embodied the research accomplished during <i>La relation d'objetNous</i> , the [[Mind]], and the <i>Les formations de l'inconscientLogos</i> culminates here, and serves [[discourse]], [[reason]]." Why such a privilege? "This [[signifier]] is chosen as an introduction the most tangible element in the real of [[sexual]] copulation; it is the most [[symbolic]] in the literal sense," since "it is equivalent to the [[logical]] copula." Moreover, "by virtue of its turgidity, it epitomizes the [[image]] of the vital flow as it is transmitted in generation." [[Freud]] says, there is only one [[libido]], [[masculine]] in [[nature]]. Later, [[Lacan]] will assert that "[[there is no such thing as sexual rapport]]," <i>Le désir et son interpretation[[il n'y a pas de rapport sexuel]]</i><br>, in the sense of proportion or relation: one sex counts for both [[sexes]]. Thus the [[phallus]] can only appear as veiled.

The alternative seems ineluctable== English =={| class="wikitable" width="100%" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:30px; background:#ffffff; text-align: either the center;"| Author(s)| Title| Publisher| Year| Pages| Language| Size| Extension| colspan="5" |Mirrors|-|[[MotherJacques Lacan]] or |The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book 5Formations of the Unconscious|Polity Press|2017|529|English|32 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[Father1]</nowiki>], [http://libgen. To choose the io/get.php?md5=766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[[Mother2]</nowiki>] means to be condemned to the dependency of , [http://b-ok.cc/md5/766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[demand3]</nowiki>], while the [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2215514 <nowiki>[Father4]</nowiki>] constitutes the access to , [http://bookfi.net/md5/766C4B3A0A8B01F96E9447AAA347A334 <nowiki>[desire5]</nowiki>], hence to salvation. If the |-|[[FatherJacques Lacan]] must be preferred to |Formations of the Unconscious, V, 1957-1958 (The Seminar of Jacques Lacan)|Polity|2017|529|English|31 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[Mother1]</nowiki>], if the [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[Father2]</nowiki>] is the origin and the representative of , [http://b-ok.cc/md5/8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[culture3]</nowiki>] (and of the , [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2307684 <nowiki>[Law4]</nowiki>]), it is because he possesses the [http://bookfi.net/md5/8B8C1EA1B489784CB763E2A3D77CFA51 <nowiki>[phallus5]</nowiki>] that he can give or refuse|} ==French=={| class="toccolours floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px; clear: right; margin: 0 0 0. The absolute primacy of the 5em 1em;"|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1em;" ||- style="vertical-align: top;"| colspan="3" style="background: #CCCCCC;" align="center" |'''Download''' [[phallus]https://mega.nz/#F!bW4QxCyT!fsfKX3uBscmVA7jzO34QAQ ALL] |- the single emblem of Man style="vertical- has become a real doctrinal (perhaps dogmatic) basis of Lacanian theoryalign: top;"|{| width="100%" style="valign: top" valign="top"The |* [https://mega.nz/#!rP4H0KqL!9ak-tFmhyuPR9s_VbsMKKnatjutEDl9Mv_EU0bouSh0 1957.11.06]* [https://mega.nz/#!qaxzHIIR!DeNLRUgC3Owzf9NPeREXWjauQdZq5cuA4Yg4YaEVDB0 1957.11.13]* [phallushttps://mega.nz/#!nOh1HaST!1x_EhuNh8qVy6sNAGAqyHNbvTDLHCUL2PeybVskDH50 1957.11.20]* [https://mega.nz/#!DWpVWYSJ!1RL2kOEwSCx2RuYHuesBDBoO6UFqz1sVemT0tiELEs0 1957.11.27] is the * [https://mega.nz/#!PewRGa5a!nCZVK2NCIHFRCCyyx90zvB1ntWusiAawY6Jskr5erL4 1957.12.04]* [https://mega.nz/#!TTxXjaJD!O8Y6JxMSkC67U29e644QNKD14IuhyabLGItualXsj6Q 1957.12.11]||* [signifierhttps://mega.nz/#!OGoliC5C!wHQeFcIXDdUkoR8rb7DMa-4-via0F_3aRvaVqXXW9XY 1957.12.18]* [https://mega.nz/#!iWxVWKpY!YG7h8zN_XVbpVMkSe4C1HCGQy4wTf8zkuqWpUPoo3T8 1958.01.08] of * [https://mega.nz/#!eHplwaBY!5Mo38u1g-7uWJ0yRJvd40KQyokKUIzT6iZJH3SN0Vcc 1958.01.15]* [signifierhttps://mega.nz/#!uXo1AA6a!bNKj9oIev1I1Qt5seIs1MVIEzmh7WCygBMvSZmnSbZY 1958.01.22]* [https://mega.nz/#!rGhVzCgJ!ewMgHhihOcglkYs_8-5TOPverhDluS63P-Ya_JrCj_k 1958.01.29]s, the privileged signifier of that mark in which the role of the logos is joined with the advent of * [https://mega.nz/#!DHxXgahA!TNiS9696jsCFJued9bP7F_u1N9cfJImcWnkky94FdY4 1958.02.05]||* [desirehttps://mega.nz/#!je4BxC4I!wIHUmJ_2XtRtQMLsT6NsxukuULWIWfm-XrrNxqVKjXg 1958.02.12]* [https://mega.nz/#!yKoxwa4a!pI_9ACzn8ULL0mWZT_rccxMyU0Iu4IKzkaCmlKutRu0 1958.03.05]," its function "touches on its most profound rapport* [https: that in which the Ancients embodied the <i>Nous</i>, the Mind, and the <i>Logos</i>, discourse, reasonmega.nz/#!WSwlgKBa!sriBkzXcgf0WEvWcfe0JyzA8ELSafkadmhviM9JuCws 1958.03." Why such a privilege? "This 12]* [https://mega.nz/#!3DpnlAoC!McI5jdeemozModSudZ2XrxIT361PVrDJMu1w4_fzopE 1958.03.19]* [signifierhttps://mega.nz/#!LH5TxI7I!Vl5gF3m5n9EmS-c1mz4_SKdTT4l85R3oh9hc4Rn5fKU 1958.03.26]* [https://mega.nz/#!mWhFhSTZ!uR7VcyNl_FnhesiiGYlqhBCBtiMXDTIecDQXJsSBJ_4 1958.04.09] is chosen as the most tangible element in the real of sexual copulation; it is the most symbolic in the literal sense," since "it is equivalent to the logical copula||* [https://mega.nz/#!DehnAaxK!91OdtBaeBc2aW566bWTMW7OCmfjudyqZihx7cfeARYc 1958." Moreover, "by virtue of its turgidity, it epitomizes the image of the vital flow as it is transmitted in generation04." 16]* [https://mega.nz/#!TegnAIbA!YvAae-tPKpbO53NMmxrEU-TtXmnW3U_SNJnhG_XznM0 1958.04.23]* [Freudhttps://mega.nz/#!eG51DK7Z!Q02-fuuRWNRmG0BLL0pOI0-6CBAoKeVNnwl90T5e9zg 1958.05.07]* [https://mega.nz/#!2PpxCATR!Xnjmp2bCuxZ6duJzVUMPXBsUVXaTpNWckkZ8GNuNSXY 1958.05.14] says, there is only one libido, masculine in nature* [https://mega.nz/#!KP5H2CyA!EbuKA3ATnXNvoqKDLGrQJEHrnfJUEDwyiTnVNfJ8l88 1958.05. Later, 21]* [https://mega.nz/#!HWgFRIKQ!GvELfjTBf94kyYjbbqCktBppIyx-3ofGURmFYunskbU 1958.06.04]||* [Lacanhttps://mega.nz/#!PeplxSyI!IVJzaYujjdcLyEVwxyXQO1RT5f3hArOHszHWRwf4Mlg 1958.06.11]* [https://mega.nz/#!eb4jEKbT!WowRSo4dahMuPUul2lFFhq6dyEuj7N9Zr5yQ_j6RFpA 1958.06.18] will assert that "* [https://mega.nz/#!yDoFnKYZ!HuUrVsRTzobt1dJlns2EdOBdALKLjGeG23gHM1wtdHw 1958.06.25]* [there is no such thing as sexual rapporthttps://mega.nz/#!Hag1ySBT!TP0JMuS_qN3vTSqki9oKEkVxCVYIY4GkuR6QUshhx9M 1958.07.02]* [https://mega.nz/#F!bW4QxCyT!fsfKX3uBscmVA7jzO34QAQ Download all]," <i>|}|}French versions of [[il nJacques Lacan|Lacan'y a pas de rapport sexuels]] [[Seminars]]<Source: http://i>, in the sense of proportion or relation: one sex counts for both sexesecole-lacanienne. Thus the net* [[phallus:File:Seminaire_05.pdf|Download]] can only appear as veiled<BR><pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_05.pdf</pdf>

<b>Le séminaire, Livre V: Les formations de [[l'inconscient]].</b><br>[[French]]: (texte établi par Jacques-[[Alain ]] [[Miller]]), [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1998.<br>[[English]]: unpublished.

|width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book II : The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955 (Seminar of Jacques Lacan)]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Trans. [[Sylvana Tomaselli]]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991. Paperback, [[Language]]: English, ISBN: 0393307093. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small>

|-|} |style="width:100%;border-left:0px solid #cccccc;background-color:#ffffff;vertical-align:top;color:#000"|{| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="text-align:justify;vertical-align:top;background-color:#ffffff"|-|style="color:#000;line-height:2em;width:100%;";|{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:0px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| align="center"| [[Image:Sem.V.jpg|200px|center]]|-|}{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="200px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|Date]]| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|PDF]]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|06 novembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.06.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|13 novembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.13.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|20 novembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.20.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|27 novembre 1957]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.27.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|04 décembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.04.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|11 décembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.11.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|18 décembre 1957]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.18.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|08 janvier 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.08.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|15 janvier 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.15.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|22 janvier 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.22.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|29 janvier 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.29.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|05 février 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.02.05.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 février 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.02.12.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|05 mars 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.05.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 mars 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.12.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|19 mars 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.19.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|26 mars 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.26.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|09 avril 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.09.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|16 avril 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.16.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|23 avril 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.23.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|30 avril 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.30.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|07 mai 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.07.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|14 mai 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.14.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|21 mai 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.21.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|04 juin 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.04.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|11 juin 1958]] | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.11.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|18 juin 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.18.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|25 juin 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.25.pdf link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|02 juillet 1958]]| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.07.02.pdf link]|} |-|}<!-- Start of right-column -->|}__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ __NOAUTOLINKS__[[Category:Seminars]] [[Category:Jacques Lacan]]