Difference between revisions of "Seminar VIII"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{S}}
 
{{S}}
 
[[Image:Sem8.jpg|thumb|250px|right]]
 
[[Image:Sem8.jpg|thumb|250px|right]]
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="width:450px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
 +
!width="100px"|
 +
!width="300px"|
 +
|-
 +
! 1960 - 1961
 +
| ''Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective)''<BR>The Seminar, Book VIII: Transference
 +
|}
  
* ''Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective), 1960-1961''.
+
==Introduction==
 
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
  
 
In ''[[La relation d'objet]]'' [[Lacan]] provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of [[transference]] in the [[treatment|analytical cure]].  
 
In ''[[La relation d'objet]]'' [[Lacan]] provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of [[transference]] in the [[treatment|analytical cure]].  
Line 14: Line 17:
  
 
In its [[imaginary|imaginary dimension]] ([[love]] and [[love|hate]]) it acts as a [[resistance]] to the [[treatment]].
 
In its [[imaginary|imaginary dimension]] ([[love]] and [[love|hate]]) it acts as a [[resistance]] to the [[treatment]].
 
  
 
----
 
----
Line 34: Line 36:
 
Thus, analysis is described as a particular experience of [[desire]], on the side of [[sexuality]].  
 
Thus, analysis is described as a particular experience of [[desire]], on the side of [[sexuality]].  
  
---
+
----
 
 
 
 
{| class="toccolours" style="float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 0.5em 1em;"
 
|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1em;"|
 
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
 
|style="background: #CCCCCC;" colspan="3" align=center|'''Download'''
 
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
 
|
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.11.17.pdf 1994.11.17.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.01.pdf 1994.12.01.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.06.pdf 1994.12.06.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.17.pdf 1994.12.17.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.12.pdf 1995.01.12.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.19.pdf 1995.01.19.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.26.pdf 1995.01.26.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.02.pdf 1995.02.02.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.09.pdf 1995.02.09.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.16.pdf 1995.02.16.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.02.pdf 1995.03.02.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.09.pdf 1995.03.09.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.16.pdf 1995.03.16.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.30.pdf 1995.03.30.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.12.pdf 1995.05.12.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.19.pdf 1995.05.19.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.25.pdf 1995.05.25.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.01.pdf 1995.06.01.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.08.pdf 1995.06.08.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.15.pdf 1995.06.15.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.22.pdf 1995.06.22.pdf]
 
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.29.pdf 1995.06.29.pdf]
 
|}
 
  
 
[[Speech]] has an effect only after [[transference]].  
 
[[Speech]] has an effect only after [[transference]].  
Line 85: Line 56:
 
[[Lacan]] calls it the desire proper to the analyst.  
 
[[Lacan]] calls it the desire proper to the analyst.  
  
---
+
----
  
 
In ''[[The Symposium]]'' the analyst's position is identified with Socrates', while Alcibiades occupies the position of the analysand, who after Socrates will discover himself desiring.  
 
In ''[[The Symposium]]'' the analyst's position is identified with Socrates', while Alcibiades occupies the position of the analysand, who after Socrates will discover himself desiring.  
Line 91: Line 62:
 
"To isolate oneself with another so as to teach him what he is lacking and, by the nature of transference, he will learn what he is lacking insofar as he loves: I am not here for his Good, but for him to love me, and for me to disappoint him."  
 
"To isolate oneself with another so as to teach him what he is lacking and, by the nature of transference, he will learn what he is lacking insofar as he loves: I am not here for his Good, but for him to love me, and for me to disappoint him."  
  
---
+
----
  
 
Alcibiades desires because he presumes Socrates is in possession of the ''agalma'' - the [[phallus]] as desirable.  
 
Alcibiades desires because he presumes Socrates is in possession of the ''agalma'' - the [[phallus]] as desirable.  
Line 121: Line 92:
  
 
Desire is only its empty place.
 
Desire is only its empty place.
 +
 +
==Bibliography==
 +
 +
* ''Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective), 1960-1961''.
 +
 +
==Library==
 +
{| class="toccolours" style="float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 0.5em 1em;"
 +
|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1em;"|
 +
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
 +
|style="background: #CCCCCC;" colspan="3" align=center|'''Download'''
 +
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
 +
|
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.11.17.pdf 1994.11.17.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.01.pdf 1994.12.01.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.06.pdf 1994.12.06.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.17.pdf 1994.12.17.pdf]
 +
||
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.12.pdf 1995.01.12.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.19.pdf 1995.01.19.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.26.pdf 1995.01.26.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.02.pdf 1995.02.02.pdf]
 +
||
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.09.pdf 1995.02.09.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.16.pdf 1995.02.16.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.02.pdf 1995.03.02.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.09.pdf 1995.03.09.pdf]
 +
||
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.16.pdf 1995.03.16.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.30.pdf 1995.03.30.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.12.pdf 1995.05.12.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.19.pdf 1995.05.19.pdf]
 +
||
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.25.pdf 1995.05.25.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.01.pdf 1995.06.01.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.08.pdf 1995.06.08.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.15.pdf 1995.06.15.pdf]
 +
||
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.22.pdf 1995.06.22.pdf]
 +
* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.29.pdf 1995.06.29.pdf]
 +
{{Also}}
 +
|}
  
  

Revision as of 16:20, 22 September 2006

<slides12> name=Seminar hideAll=true fontsize=100% hideFooter=false showButtons=true hideMenu=false hideHeading=false

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII Index

</slides12>

Sem8.jpg
1960 - 1961 Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective)
The Seminar, Book VIII: Transference

Introduction

In La relation d'objet Lacan provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of transference in the analytical cure.


In its symbolic dimension (repetition) it helps the treatment to progress, by revealing the signifiers of the subject's history.

In its imaginary dimension (love and hate) it acts as a resistance to the treatment.



He uses Plato's The Symposium to illustrate the rapport between analysand and analyst: Alcibiades compares Socrates to a box enclosing a precious object, agalma.

Just as Alcibiades attributes a hidden treasure to Socrates, so too the patient sees his object of desire in the analyst.

Lacan articulates the objet a with agalma, the object of desire we seek in the other. Before, the emphasis was placed on repetition, now it is placed on transference love, amour de transfert: both are inseparable, but the perspective changes.

To insist on repetition means to refuse to see in the analytic situation an intersubjective rapport to be dealt with here and now.

What speech constructed in the past can be deconstructed in the cure by speech: the cure is "pure symbolic experience."

On the individual level, it allows for "the reshaping of the imaginary," on the theorethical level for an intersubjective logic to be constructed.

Thus, analysis is described as a particular experience of desire, on the side of sexuality.


Speech has an effect only after transference.

For Lacan "it is from the position that transference bestows the analyst with that he intervenes in transference itself," and "transference is interpreted on the basis of and with the aid of transference itself."

In "The direction of the treatment and the principles of its power" (Écrits: A Selection) Lacan presented countertransference as a resistance of the analyst and raised the problem of the analyst's desire.

Here, subjective disparity becomes the rule establishing dissymmetry between the two protagonists vis-à-vis desire: what the patient will discover through the disappointment of transference love.

Because in the cure one learns to talk instead of making love, in the end desire, which has been purified, is but the empty place where the barred subject accesses desire.

We should note that training analysis does not put the analyst beyond passion; to believe that it does would mean that all passions stem from the unconscious, a notion that Lacan rejects.

The better analysed the analyst is, the more likely he is to be in love with, or be quite repulsed by, the analysand.

In training-analysis there will be a mutation in the economy of desire in the analyst-to-be: desire will be restructured, so that it will be stronger than passions.

Lacan calls it the desire proper to the analyst.


In The Symposium the analyst's position is identified with Socrates', while Alcibiades occupies the position of the analysand, who after Socrates will discover himself desiring.

"To isolate oneself with another so as to teach him what he is lacking and, by the nature of transference, he will learn what he is lacking insofar as he loves: I am not here for his Good, but for him to love me, and for me to disappoint him."


Alcibiades desires because he presumes Socrates is in possession of the agalma - the phallus as desirable.

But Socrates refuses the position of loved object to assert himself as desiring.

For Lacan desire never occurs between two subjects but between a subject and an overvalorized being who has fallen to the state of an object.

The only way to discover the other as subject is "to recognize that he speaks an articulated language and responds to ours with his own combinations; the other cannot fit into our calculations as someone who coheres like us."

Socrates, by shying away from Alcibiades' declaration, by refusing to mask his lack with a fetish, and by showing him Agathon as the true object of his love, shows the analyst how to behave: such is the other aspect of "subjective disparity" taking place in analysis.

There is no rapport between what the one possesses and what the other lacks.

The phallus, from being objet a, the imaginary object, emerges as the signifier of signifiers, as "the only signifier that deserves the role of symbol.

It designates the real presence that permits identification, the origin of the Ideal-of-the-Ego on the side of the Other."

There is a woman in The Symposium, Diotima, who speaks in the form of myth. In the fable where female lack is confronted with male resources, the feminine first has an active role before the desirable masculine.

The reversal occurs because in love one only gives what one does not have: the masculine, by shying away from the demand, is revealed as a subject of desire.

Later, Lacan would make Socrates the model of hysterical discourse, but also of analytic discourse because he attains the knowledge, the episteme, of love.

Having managed to provoke "a mutation in the economy of his desire," the analyst has access both to the unconscious and to the experience of the unconscious because, like Socrates, he has confronted the desire for death and achieved the "between-two-deaths" - entre-deux-morts.

Having placed the signifier in the position of the absolute, he has abolished "fear and trembling." "One puts one's desire aside so as to preserve what is the most precious, the phallus, the symbol of desire."

Desire is only its empty place.

Bibliography

  • Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective), 1960-1961.

Library

Download