Difference between revisions of "Seminar VIII"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="text-align:justify;color:#000;line-height:2.5em;align:justify;"|
 
|style="text-align:justify;color:#000;line-height:2.5em;align:justify;"|
{| align="center" style="width:400px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
+
{| align="center" style="width:300px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
 
|width="100px"|
 
|width="100px"|
|width="300px"|
+
|width="200px"|
 
|-
 
|-
| [[{{Y}}|1960 - 1961]]
+
| [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]
| ''[[Le transfert|Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective)]]''<BR>[[Transference]]
+
| ''[[Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''<BR>[[Freud's Papers on Technique]]
 
|}
 
|}
  
In <i>[[La relation d'objet]]</i> [[Lacan]] provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of [[transference]] in the [[analytic]]al [[cure]].  In its [[symbolic]] aspect ([[repetition]]) it helps the [[cure]] progress by revealing the [[signifier]]s of the [[subject]]'s historyHe argues that in its [[imaginary]] aspect ([[love]] and [[hate]]) it acts as a [[resistance]]. He uses [[Plato]]'s <i>[[The Symposium]]</i> to illustrate the rapport between analysand and analyst: Alcibiades compares Socrates to a box enclosing a precious [[object]], <i>[[agalma]]</i>. Just as Alcibiades attributes a hidden treasure to Socrates, so too the [[patient]] sees his [[object]] of [[desire]] in the [[analyst]].  [[Lacan]] articulates the <i>[[objet a]]</i> with <i>[[agalma]]</i>, the [[object of desire]] we seek in the [[other]].
+
The first [[seminar]], open to the public, takes place at [[Sainte-Anne Hospital]] just after the creation of the [[S.F.P]] ([[Société Française de Psychanalyse]]).  [[Lacan]] cuts in the study of [[Freud]] by dint of his theory on the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].  The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]].  Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections.  Through the case histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], Kris and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]] to systematize his analyses of the [[specular relation]].  After his [[schema]] of the [[inverted bouquet]] the [[mirror stage]] becomes part of the [[topography]] of the [[Imaginary]]. As to the ''[[méconnaissance]]'' that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ''[[Verneinung]]'' (''[[dénégation]]''): "...everyday [[speech]] runs against failure of [[recognition]], ''[[méconnaissance]]'', which is the source of ''[[Verneinung]]''."  He closes the [[seminar]] pondering on the [[role]] of the [[analyst]]: "...if the subject commits himself to searching after [[truth]] as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what [[analyst]]s call readiness to the [[transference]].  The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worth of consideration.  He doesn't have to guide the [[subject]] to [[knowledge]], but on to the paths by which access to this [[knowledge]] is gained.  [[Psychoanalysis]] is a [[dialectic]]s, an [[art]] of conversation."
  
Before, the emphasis was placed on repetition, now it is placed on [[transference]] [[love]], <i>amour de transfert</i>: both are inseparable, but the perspective changes.  To insist on [[repetition]] means to refuse to see in the analytic situation an [[intersubjective]] rapport to be dealt with here and now.  What [[speech]] constructed in the past can be deconstructed in the [[cure]] by [[speech]]: the [[cure]] is "pure [[symbolic]] experience." On the individual level, it allows for "the reshaping of the [[imaginary]]," on the theorethical level for an intersubjective logic to be constructed.  Thus, [[analysis]] is described as a particular experience of [[desire]], on the side of [[sexuality]].  [[Speech]] has an effect only after [[transference]].  For [[Lacan]] "it is from the position that [[transference]] bestows the [[analyst]] with that he intervenes in [[transference]] itself," and "[[transference]] is interpreted on the basis of and with the aid of [[transference]] itself."  In "The direction of the treatment and the principles of its power" (<i>[[Écrits: A Selection]]</i>) [[Lacan]] presented [[countertransference]] as a [[resistance]] of the [[analyst]] and raised the problem of the [[analyst]]'s [[desire]].  Here, subjective disparity becomes the rule establishing dissymmetry between the two protagonists vis-à-vis [[desire]]: what the [[patient]] will discover through the disappointment of [[transference]] [[love]].  Because in the [[cure]] one learns to talk instead of making [[love]], in the end [[desire]], which has been purified, is but the empty place where the barred [[subject]] accesses [[desire]].  We should note that [[training analysis]] does not put the [[analyst]] beyond passion; to believe that it does would mean that all passions stem from the [[unconscious]], a notion that [[Lacan]] rejects.  The better analysed the [[analyst]] is, the more likely he is to be in [[love]] with, or be quite repulsed by, the [[analysand]]. In training-analysis there will be a mutation in the economy of [[desire]] in the analyst-to-be: desire will be restructured, so that it will be stronger than passions. [[Lacan]] calls it the [[desire]] proper to the [[analyst]].
+
In a spoken intervention (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s ''[[Verneinung]]'' and suggests its translation as ''[[dénégation]]'' instead of ''[[négation]]''The question here deals with how the [[return]] of the [[repress]]ed operatesAccording to [[Freud]] the [[repress]]ed is intellectually accepted by the [[subject]], since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the [[subject]] refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it.  ''[[Dénégation]]'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between [[neurosis]] and [[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ''[[Verdrägung]]'', and [[repudiation]], ''[[Verwerfung]]'', a term that [[Lacan]] will replace by [[withdrawal]], and finally by "[[foreclosure]]" (''[[forclusion]]''), the former being related to [[neurosis]], the latter to [[psychosis]].
  
In <i>The Symposium</i> the [[analyst]]'s position is identified with Socrates', while Alcibiades occupies the position of the [[analysand]], who after Socrates will discover himself desiring"To isolate oneself with another so as to teach him what he is lacking and, by the nature of [[transference]], he will learn what he is lacking insofar as he loves: I am not here for his Good, but for him to love me, and for me to disappoint him."
+
When answering Hyppolite in La Psychanalyse that same year, [[Lacan]] establishes two poles of [[analytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]].  [[Lacan]] gives precedence to the [[Symbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]].  The [[subject]] who must come to be is "the [[subject of the unconscious]]" and "the [[unconscious is the discourse of the Other]]."  In [[analysis]], he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."
  
Alcibiades desires because he presumes Socrates is in possession of the <i>[[agalma]]</i> - the [[phallus]] as desirable.  But Socrates refuses the position of [[love]]d [[object]] to assert himself as desiring.  For [[Lacan]] [[desire]] never occurs between two [[subject]]s but between a [[subject]] and an overvalorized being who has fallen to the state of an [[object]].  The only way to discover the other as subject is "to recognize that he speaks an articulated [[language]] and responds to ours with his own combinations; the other cannot fit into our calculations as someone who coheres like us."  Socrates, by shying away from Alcibiades' declaration, by refusing to mask his [[lack]] with a fetish, and by showing him Agathon as the true object of his [[love]], shows the [[analyst]] how to behave: such is the other aspect of "subjective disparity" taking place in [[analysis]].  There is no rapport between what the one possesses and what the other [[lack]]s. The [[phallus]], from being <i>[[objet a]]</i>, the [[imaginary]] [[object]], emerges as the [[signifier]] of [[signifier]]s, as "the only [[signifier]] that deserves the role of [[symbol]].  It designates the [[real]] [[presence]] that permits [[identification]], the origin of the [[Ideal]]-of-the-[[Ego]] on the side of the [[Other]]."  There is a [[woman]] in <i>The Symposium</i>, Diotima, who speaks in the form of [[myth]].  In the fable where female lack is confronted with male resources, the [[feminine]] first has an active role before the desirable [[masculine]].  The reversal occurs because in love one only gives what one does not have: the [[masculine]], by shying away from the [[demand]], is revealed as a [[subject]] of [[desire]].  Later, [[Lacan]] would make Socrates the model of [[hysteric]]al [[discourse]], but also of [[analytic discourse]] because he attains the [[knowledge]], the episteme, of [[love]].
+
To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[Symbolic]], he opposes the intersection of the [[Symbolic]] and the [[Real]] without mediation of the [[Imaginary]], which would be the characteristic of [[psychosis]].
 
 
Having managed to provoke "a mutation in the economy of his [[desire]]," the [[analyst]] has access both to the [[unconscious]] and to the experience of the [[unconscious]] because, like Socrates, he has confronted the [[desire]] for [[death]] and achieved the "between-two-deaths" - <i>entre-deux-morts</i>.  Having placed the [[signifier]] in the position of the absolute, he has abolished "fear and trembling."  "One puts one's [[desire]] aside so as to preserve what is the most precious, the [[phallus]], the [[symbol]] of [[desire]]."  [[Desire]] is only its empty place.
 
  
 
<!--
 
<!--
Line 46: Line 44:
 
{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:0px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
 
{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:0px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center"| [[Image:Sem.VIII.jpg|200px|center]]
+
| align="center"| [[Image:Sem.I.jpg|200px|center]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
 
{| class="wikitable" width="200px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="200px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|Date]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|Date]]
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|PDF]]
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|PDF]]
 +
| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | [[{{Y}}|DOC]]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|06 novembre 1957]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|18 novembre 1953]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.06.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1953.11.18.pdf link]
|-
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/18nov53.doc link]
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|13 novembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.13.pdf link]
 
|-
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|20 novembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.20.pdf link]
 
|-
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|27 novembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.11.27.pdf link]
 
|-
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|04 décembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.04.pdf link]
 
|-
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|11 décembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.11.pdf link]
 
|-
 
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |  [[{{Y}}|18 décembre 1957]]
 
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1957.12.18.pdf link]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|08 janvier 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|13 janvier 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.08.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.01.13.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/13janvier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|15 janvier 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" |[[{{Y}}| 20 janvier 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.15.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.01.20.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|22 janvier 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|27 janvier 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.22.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.01.27.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/27janvier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|29 janvier 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|3 février 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.01.29.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.02.03.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/3fevrier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|05 février 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|10 février 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.02.05.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.02.10.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/10fevrier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 février 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|17 février 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.02.12.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.02.17.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/17fevrier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|05 mars 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|24 février 1954]]  
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.05.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.02.24.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/24fevrier1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 mars 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|10 mars 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.12.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.03.10.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/10mars1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|19 mars 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|17 mars 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.19.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.03.17.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/17mars1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|26 mars 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|24 mars 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.03.26.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.03.24.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/24mars1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|09 avril 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|31 mars 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.09.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.03.31.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/31mars1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|16 avril 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|7 avril 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.16.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.04.07.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/7avril1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|23 avril 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|5 mai 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.23.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.05.05.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/5mai1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|30 avril 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|12 mai 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.04.30.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.05.12.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/12mai1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|07 mai 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|19 mai 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.07.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.05.19.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/19mai1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|14 mai 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|26 mai 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.14.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.05.26.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/26mai1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|21 mai 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|2 juin 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.05.21.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.06.02.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/2juin1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|04 juin 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|9 juin 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.04.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.06.09.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/9juin1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|11 juin 1958]]  
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|16 juin 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.11.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.06.16.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/16juin1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|18 juin 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|23 juin 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.18.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.06.23.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/23juin1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|25 juin 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|30 juin 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.06.25.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.06.30.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/30juin1954.doc link]
 
|-
 
|-
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|02 juillet 1958]]
+
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|7 juillet 1954]]
| [http://{{archive}}/seminaireV/1958.07.02.pdf link]
+
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/1954.07.07.pdf link]
 +
| [http://{{seminaires}}/seminaireI/7juillet1954.doc link]
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 20:34, 22 June 2007

<slides12> name=Seminar hideAll=true fontsize=100% hideFooter=false showButtons=true hideMenu=false hideHeading=false

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII Index

</slides12>

1953 - 1954 Les écrits techniques de Freud
Freud's Papers on Technique

The first seminar, open to the public, takes place at Sainte-Anne Hospital just after the creation of the S.F.P (Société Française de Psychanalyse). Lacan cuts in the study of Freud by dint of his theory on the imaginary, the symbolic and the real. The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the cure. Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections. Through the case histories of Freud, Klein, Kris and Balint, the debate elucidates on the convergence of psychoanalysis, philosophy, theology, linguistics and game theory. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, Lacan will further appeal to the science of optics to systematize his analyses of the specular relation. After his schema of the inverted bouquet the mirror stage becomes part of the topography of the Imaginary. As to the méconnaissance that characterizes the ego, it is associated with Verneinung (dénégation): "...everyday speech runs against failure of recognition, méconnaissance, which is the source of Verneinung." He closes the seminar pondering on the role of the analyst: "...if the subject commits himself to searching after truth as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what analysts call readiness to the transference. The analyst's ignorance is also worth of consideration. He doesn't have to guide the subject to knowledge, but on to the paths by which access to this knowledge is gained. Psychoanalysis is a dialectics, an art of conversation."

In a spoken intervention (Appendix), Jean Hyppolite comments on Freud's Verneinung and suggests its translation as dénégation instead of négation. The question here deals with how the return of the repressed operates. According to Freud the repressed is intellectually accepted by the subject, since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the subject refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it. Dénégation includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between neurosis and psychosis is drawn here, between repression, Verdrägung, and repudiation, Verwerfung, a term that Lacan will replace by withdrawal, and finally by "foreclosure" (forclusion), the former being related to neurosis, the latter to psychosis.

When answering Hyppolite in La Psychanalyse that same year, Lacan establishes two poles of analytic experience: the imaginary ego and the symbolic speech. Lacan gives precedence to the Symbolic over the Imaginary. The subject who must come to be is "the subject of the unconscious" and "the unconscious is the discourse of the Other." In analysis, he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."

To this reshaping of the Imaginary by the Symbolic, he opposes the intersection of the Symbolic and the Real without mediation of the Imaginary, which would be the characteristic of psychosis.

Sem.I.jpg
Date PDF DOC
18 novembre 1953 link link
13 janvier 1954 link link
20 janvier 1954 link link
27 janvier 1954 link link
3 février 1954 link link
10 février 1954 link link
17 février 1954 link link
24 février 1954 link link
10 mars 1954 link link
17 mars 1954 link link
24 mars 1954 link link
31 mars 1954 link link
7 avril 1954 link link
5 mai 1954 link link
12 mai 1954 link link
19 mai 1954 link link
26 mai 1954 link link
2 juin 1954 link link
9 juin 1954 link link
16 juin 1954 link link
23 juin 1954 link link
30 juin 1954 link link
7 juillet 1954 link link