24,656
edits
Changes
no edit summary
This makes the [[shifter]] a '[[symbol]]'.
[[JakobsoJakobson]] concludes that [[shifter]]s combine both [[symbolic]] and [[index]]ical functions and "belong therefore to the class of indexical symbols."<ref>Jakobson, 1957: 132.</ref>
In this way, [[Jakobson]] questions the possibility of a context-free grammar, since the [[enunciation]] is encoded in the [[statement]] itself.
On the other hand, as an [[index]] it is clearly part of the [[enunciation]].
This [[divisiodivision]] of the 'I' is not merely illustrative of the [[splitting]] of the [[subject]]; it is that [[split]].
"Indeed, the I of the enunciation is not the same as the I of the statement, that is to say, the shifter which, in the statement, designates him."<ref>{{S11}} p.139</ref>
==See Also==
* [[Jakobson]]
* [[symbolicSymbolic]]* [[symbolSymbol]]* [[statementStatement]]* [[enunciationEnunciation]]* [[linguisticsLinguistics]]* ''[[langueLangue]]''* ''[[paroleParole]]''* [[splittingSplitting]]* [[subjectSubject]]
== References ==
