Changes

<blockquote>The lapse in [[speech ]] ... is without [[doubt ]] a motor function.<ref>{{PEL}} Ch. 8</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>We find that, in [[order ]] to explain a [[slip ]] of the tongue, for [[instance]], we are obliged to assume that an [[intention ]] to say some [[particular ]] [[thing ]] had formed itself in the [[mind ]] of the person who made the slip. We can infer it with [[certainty ]] from the occurrence of the speech-[[disturbance]], but it was not able to obtain expression; it was, that is to say, [[unconscious]].<ref>{{NILP}} Ch. 3</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>What we observe in normal persons as [[slips of the tongue ]] gives the same impression as the first step of the so-called "paraphasias" which [[manifest ]] themselves under pathologic [[conditions]].<ref>{{PEL}} Ch. 5</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>The speech disturbance which manifests itself as a speechblunder may, in the first [[place]], be caused by the influence of [[another ]] component of the same speech; that is, through a foresound or an echo, or through another [[meaning ]] within the [[sentence ]] or context which differs from that which the [[speaker ]] wishes to utter. In the second place, however, the disturbance could be brought [[about ]] through influences [[outside ]] this [[word]], sentence or context, from elements which we did not intend to express, and of whose incitement we became [[conscious ]] only through the disturbance. In both modes of origin of the mistake in speech, the common element lies in the simultaneity of the stimulus, while the differentiating elements lie in the arrangement within or without the same sentence or context.<ref>{{PEL}} Ch. 5</ref></blockquote>