automoderated, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, Forum administrators, lookupuser, moderator, oversight, staff, Administrators
9
edits
Changes
→Foundation
The early 1950s were a [[time]] of growing disagreements within the SPP, mainly centred on the question of the [[training]] of [[analysts]].<ref>Roudinesco, p. 201</ref> Despite wishing himself to avoid a split, Lacan was drawn into the dissident movement led by [[Daniel Lagache]], as a result of his own [[separate]] dispute with the president [[Sacha Nacht]] over his [[practice]] of "[[short sessions]]".<ref>[http://www.spp.asso.fr/Main/HistoirePsy/Histoire/Items/8.htm SPP history of the discussions on psychoanalytic technique (French language)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070309200737/http://www.spp.asso.fr/main/HistoirePsy/Histoire/Items/8.htm |date=2007-03-09 }}</ref>
After a year of disagreements and a vote of no confidence, five members of the SPP resigned from the body in June 1953.<ref>[http://www.spp.asso.fr/Main/HistoirePsy/Histoire/Items/9.htm SPP history of the schism (French language)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070308054958/http://www.spp.asso.fr/main/HistoirePsy/Histoire/Items/9.htm |date=2007-03-08 }}</ref> These five were Lacan, Lagache, [[wp:Françoise Dolto|Dolto]], Favez-Boutonnier and Reverchon-Jouve.
Unfortunately an unexpected by-product of the split was to deprive the new group, who termed themselves the Société Française de Psychanalyse (SFP), of membership of the [[International Psychoanalytical Association]] (IPA), to which they now had to seek out affiliation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1= Hartmann |first1= Heintz |date=Jan 1953|title=XVIIIth Congress of the International Psychoanalytical Association, Report from the President |journal=[[October (journal)|October]] |volume=40 |author2= Sauer, R; Birkenhake, S; Kühn, R; Wittekind, C; Schrott, Km; Martus, P |issue= 1 |pages= 121–7 |issn= 0360-3016 |pmid= 9422567}}, p72</ref>
