Changes
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{ToppToppp}}psychose]]|-|| [[German]]: ''[[Psychose{{Bottom}}
==SchreberJacques Lacan==In ===History===[[Lacan]] discussed [[psychosis]] throughout his [[Jacques Lacan:Bibliography|work]]. His interest in [[psychosis]] predates his interest in [[seminarpsychoanalysis]]. [[Jacques Lacan]] on studied [[psychosis]] (for his doctoral research about a [[woman]] he calls "[[Aimee]]."<ref>{{Y1932}}|1955-6</ref> Indeed it was his doctoral research, which concerned a [[psychotic]] [[woman]] whom [[Lacan]] calls [[Aimée]]) that first led [[Lacan]] tackled to [[psychoanalytic theory]].<ref>{{1932}}</ref> It is common to compare [[FreudLacan]]'s case history tortured and at [[times]] almost incomprehensible style of [[Judge Schrberwriting]], a and speaking to the discourse of [[psychotic]] [[patient]]s. [[paranoidLacan]] 's discussions of [[schizophrenicpsychosis]] who wrote a fascinating account are among the most significant and original aspects of his illnesss entitled ''Memoirs of My Nervous Illness'' (1903)[[work]]. [[Lacan]]'s essay "On a question preliminary to any possible treatment most detailed [[discussion]] of [[psychosis (1957]] appears in his [[seminar]] of 1955-8)6, entitled simply ''[[Seminar III|The Psychoses]]' enlarged on '. It is here that he expounds what come to be the ideas main tenets of this the [[Lacan]]ian approach to [[seminarmadness]].
===Clinical Structure===
[[Psychosis]] is defined as one of the three [[clinical structure]]s, one of which is defined by the operation of [[foreclosure]]. In this operation, the [[Name-of-the-Father]] is not integrated in the [[symbolic order|symbolic universe]] of the [[psychotic]] (it is "[[foreclosed]]"), with the result that a [[hole]] is [[left]] in the [[symbolic order]]. To [[speak]] of a [[lack|hole]] in the [[symbolic order]] is not to say that the [[psychotic]] does not have an [[unconscious]]; on the contrary, in [[psychosis]] "the unconscious is [[present]] but not functioning."<ref>{{S3}} p. 208</ref> The [[psychotic]] [[structure]] thus results from a certain malfunction of the [[Oedipus complex]], a [[lack]] in the [[paternal function]]; more specifically, in [[psychosis]] the [[paternal function]] is reduced to the [[image]] of the [[father]] (the [[symbolic]] is reduced to the [[imaginary]]).
==Treatment=The Psychotic Relation to Reality===In his articles on [[psychosis]] [[Freud]] was skeptical about noted the possibility [[psychotic]]'s altered relation to [[reality]]. The 'imaginary [[external]] world' of practising a psychosis attempts to put itself in [[psychoanalysisplace]] with of the 'external world'. (In Lacanian [[terms]], there are altered relations between [[psychoticthe Imaginary]] and Real Orders, in parallel with an alteration in [[patientsthe Symbolic]]Order).
In studying [[Lacanpsychosis]] follows Lacan stated, following [[Freud]] , that "the problem lies not in arguing the reality that while is lost, but in that which takes its place."<ref>{{E}} p. 188-9</ref> Lacan emphasized the 'rent' or [[psychosisgap]] is that appears in the relation of the psychotic subject to the world, and the nature of great interest for the 'patch' which the psychotic subject applies over this gap.<!-- ====Psychotic Phenomena==== --><!-- In [[Lacan]]ian [[psychoanalytic theorypsychoanalysis]], it is outside the field of the classical method of important to distinguish between [[psychoanalytic treatmentpsychosis]], which is only appropriate for a [[clinical structure]], and [[psychotic]] phenomena such as [[delusions]] and [[hallucinations]]. Two [[neurosisconditions]]; "are required for psychotic phenomena to use emerge: the technique that [[Freudsubject]] must have a [[psychotic]] [[structure]] established outside , and the experience [[Name-of-the-Father]] must be "called into symbolic opposition to which it was applied (ithe subject.e"<ref>{{E}} p. neurosis) is as stupid as to toil at 217</ref> In the oars when [[absence]] of the ship is on first condition, no confrontation with the sandpaternal signifier will ever lead to psychotic phenomena; a [[neurotic]] can never "become psychotic."<ref>{{ES3}} p. 22115</ref> In the [[absence]] of the second condition, the [[psychotic]] [[structure]] will remain [[latent]]. It is thus conceivable that a [[subject]] may have a [[psychotic]] [[structure]] and yet never develop [[delusions]] or [[experience]] [[hallucination]]s. When both conditions are fulfilled, the [[psychosis]] is "triggered off," the latent [[psychosis]] becomes [[manifest]] in [[hallucination]]s and/or [[delusions]]. --><!-- ==[[Borromean Knot]]== --><!-- In the 1970s [[Lacan]] reformulates his approach to [[psychosis]] around the [[notion]] of the [[borromean knot]]. The three rings in the [[knot]] [[represent]] the three [[orders]]: the [[real]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[imaginary]]. While in [[neurosis]] these three rings are linked together in a particular way, in [[psychosis]] they become disentangled. This [[psychotic]] disassociation may sometimes however be avoided by a [[sinthome|symptomaatic formation]] which [[acts]] as a fourth ring holding the [[other]] three together. -->
<!-- Not only is the classical method of [[psychoanalytic treatment]] inappropriate for [[psychotic]] [[subject]]s, but it is even contraindicated. For example [[Lacan]] points out that the technique of [[psychoanalysis]], which involves the use of the couch and [[free association]], can easily trigger off a latent [[psychosis]].<ref>{{S3}} p. 15</ref> This is the [[reason]] why [[Lacan]]ian [[analyst]]s usually follow [[Freud]]'s recommendation to begin the [[treatment]] of a new [[patient]] with a series of face-to-face interviews.<ref>{{F}} p.1913c. [[SE]] XII. 123-4</ref> Only when the [[analyst]] is reasonably sure that the [[patient]] is not [[psychotic]] will the [[patient]] be asked to lie down on the couch and [[free association|free associate]]. -->
This does not mean that Lacanian [[analysts]] do not work with [[psychotic]] [[patient]]s. On the contrary, much work has been done by [[Lacanian]] [[analyst]]s in the [[treatment]] of [[psychosis]]. However, the method of [[treatment]] differs substantially from that used with [[neurotic]] and [[perverse]] [[patient]]s. [[Lacan]] himself works with [[psychotic]] [[patient]]s but left very few comments on the technique he employed; rather than setting out a technical procedure for [[working]] with [[psychosis]], he limited himself to discussing the questions preliminary to any such work.<ref>{{L}} p. 1957-8b</ref>
<!-- [[Lacan]] rejects the approach of those who [[limit]] their analysis of [[psychosis]] to the [[imaginary order]]; "[[nothing]] is to be expected from the way psychosis is explored at the level of the [[imaginary]], since [[the imaginary]] [[mechanism]] is what gives psychotic [[alienation]] its [[form]], but not its dynamics."<ref>{{S3}} p. 146</ref> It is only by focusing on the [[symbolic order]] that [[Lacan]] is able to point to the fundamental determining element of [[psychosis]], namely, the hole in the [[symbolic]] [[order]] caused by [[foreclosure]] and the consequent "imprisonment" of the psychotic subject in the imaginary. It is also this emphasis on the [[symbolic order]] which leads [[Lacan]] to [[value]] above all the [[linguistic]] phenomena in [[psychosis]]: "the importance given to language phenomena in psychosis is for us the msot fruitful lesson of all."<ref>{{S3}} p. 144</ref> -->
<!-- ====Language Disorders====--><!-- The [[language]] phenomena most notable in [[psychosis]] are ''disorders'' of [[language]], and [[Lacan]] argues that the [[presence]] of such disorders is a necessary condition for a diagnosis of [[psychosis]].<ref>{{S3}} p. 92</ref> Among the psychotic language disorders which Lacan draws attention to are holophrases and the extensive use of neologisms (which may be completely new [[words ]] coined by the psychotic, or already existing words which the psychotic redefines).<ref>{{Ec}} p. 167</ref> In [[{{Y}}|1956]], [[Lacan]] attributes these [[language]] disorders to the [[psychotic]]'s [[lack]] of a sufficient [[number ]] of ''[[points de capiton]]''.--> <!-- The lack of sufficient ''[[points de capiton]]'' means that the psychotic experience is characterized by a constant [[slippage ]] of the [[signified ]] under the signifier, which is a disaster for [[signification]]; there is a continual "cascade of reshapings of the signifier fromw hich the increasing disaster of the imaginary proceeds, until the level is reached at which signifier and signified are stablized in the delusional [[metaphor]]."<ref>{{E}} p. 217</ref> [[Another ]] way of describing this is as "a [[relationship ]] between the subject and the signifier in its most [[formal ]] [[dimension]], in its dimension as a pure signifier."<ref>{{S3}} p. 250</ref> This relationship of the subject to the signifier in its purely formal aspect constitutes "the nucleus of psychosis."<ref>{{S3}} p.250</ref> "If the neurotic inhabits language, the psychotic is inhabited, possessed, by language."<ref>{{S3}} p. 250</ref> -->
== References ==
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
{{OK}}
[[Category:Practice]]
[[Category:Subject]]
__NOTOC__