Difference between revisions of "Split"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
split (refente)              Freud talks about the 'splitting of the ego' (Ger. Ich-
split (refente)              Freud talks about the 'splitting of the ego' (Ger. Ich-

Revision as of 05:21, 26 April 2006

split (refente) Freud talks about the 'splitting of the ego' (Ger. Ich-

spaltung, Fr. clivage du moi) as a process, observable in fetishism and

psychosis, whereby two contradictory attitudes to reality come to exist side

by side in the ego; those of acceptance and DISAVOWAL (see Freud, 1940b).

Lacan amplifies the concept of Spaltung (which he prefers to translate by the

  term refente; see S8, 144) to designate not a process unique to fetishism or

psychosis but a general characteristic of subjectity itself; the SUBJECT Can neVer

be anything other than divided, split, alienated from himself (see ALIENATION).

The split is irreducible, can never be healed; there is no possibility of


     The split or divided subject is symbolised by the BAR which strikes through

the S to produce the barred subject, S (see E, 288). The split denotes the

impossibility of the ideal of a fully present self-consciousness; the subject will

  never know himself completely, but will always be cut off from his own

knowledge. It thus indicates the presence of the unconscious, and is an effect

of the signifier. The subject is split by the very fact that he is a speaking being

(E, 269), since speech divides the subject of the ENUNCIATION from the subject

of the statement. In his seminar of 1964-5 Lacan theorises the split subject in

  terms of a division between truth and knowledge (savoir) (see Ec, 856).