Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Subject

1,321 bytes added, 23:58, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
subject ({{Top}}[[sujet) ]]{{Bottom}}
=====Jacques Lacan=====The term '"[[subject' ]]" is [[present ]] from the very earliest of [[Lacan]]'s [[psychoanalytic ]] writings (see Lacan, <ref>{{1932), }}</ref> and from 1945 on it occupies a central part in [[Lacan]]'s [[work. This is a distinctive feature of Lacan's work, since the term does not constitute part of Freud's theoretical vocabulary, but is more associated with philosophical, legal and linguistic discourses]].
In This is a distinctive feature of [[Lacan]]'s pre-war paperswork, since the term does not constitute part of [[Freud]]'subject' seems to mean no more than 'human being' (see Ecs [[theoretical]] [[vocabulary]], 75); the term but is also used to refer to the analysand (Ecmore associated with [[philosophical]], 83)[[legal]] and [[linguistic]] [[discourse]]s.
=====Human Being=====In 1945, [[Lacan distinguishes between three kinds of subject. Firstly, there is the impersonal subject, independent of the other, the pure grammatical subject, the noetic subject, the ]]'it' of 'it is known that.' Secondlys pre-war papers, there is the anonymous reciprocal term "[[subject who is completely equal ]]" seems to and substitutable for any other, and who recognises himself in equivalence with the othermean no more than "human being."<ref>{{Ec}} p.75</ref>
Thirdly, there =====Analysand=====The term is also used to refer to the personal subject, whose uniqueness is constituted by an act of self-affirmation ([[analysand]].<ref>{{Ec, 207-8). It is always this third sense of the subject, the subject in his uniqueness, that constitutes the focus of Lacan's work}} p.83</ref>
=====Three Kinds=====In 19531945, [[Lacan establishes a distinction ]] distinguishes between the subject and the EGO which will remain one of the most fundamental distinctions throughout the rest of his work. Whereas the ego is part of the imaginary order, the subject is part of the symbolic. Thus the subject is not simply equivalent to a conscious sense of agency, which is a mere illusion produced by the ego, but to the unconscious; Lacan's 'subject' is the subject of the unconscious. Lacan argues that this distinction can be traced back to Freud: '[Freud[three]] wrote Das Ich und das Es in order to maintain this fundamental distinction between the true subject kinds of the unconscious and the ego as constituted in its nucleus by a series of alienating identifications' (E, 128). Although psychoanalytic treatment has powerful effects on the ego, it is the [[subject, and not the ego, on which psychoanalysis primarily operates]].
Lacan plays on # Firstly, there is the various meanings impersonal [[subject]], independent of the term '[[other]], the pure [[grammatical]] [[subject'. In linguistics and logic]], the noetic [[subject of a proposition is that about which something is predicated (see Lacan]], 1967: 19), and is also opposed to the 'object'. Lacan plays on the philosophical nuances "it" of the latter term to emphasise that his concept of the subject concerns those aspects of the human being "it is known that cannot (or must not) be objectified (reified, reduced to a thing), nor be studied in an 'objective' way."
'What do we call a # Secondly, there is the anonymous reciprocal [[subject'? Quite precisely]] who is completely equal to and substitutable for any other, what and who recognises himself in equivalence with the development of objectivation, is outside of the object' (Sl, 194)other.
References to language come to dominate Lacan's concept of the subject from the mid-1950s on. He distinguishes the subject of the statement from the subject of the ENUNCIATION to show that because the subject is essentially a speaking being (parlÍtre)# Thirdly, he there is inescapably divided, castrated, SPLIT. In the early 1960s Lacan defines the personal [[subject as that which ]], whose uniqueness is represented constituted by a signifier for another signifier; in other words, the subject is an effect act of language ([[self]]-[[affirmation]].<ref>{{Ec, 835)}} p.207-8</ref>
Besides its place in linguistics and logicIt is always this [[third]] [[sense]] of the [[subject]], the term '[[subject' also has philosophical and legal connotations. In philosophical discourse, it denotes an individual self-consciousness, whereas ]] in legal discoursehis uniqueness, it denotes a person who is under that constitutes the power focus of another (e.g. a person who is subject to the sovereign). The fact that the term possesses both these meanings means that it perfectly illustrates [[Lacan]]'s thesis about the determination of consciousness by the symbolic order; 'the subject is a subject only by virtue of his subjection to the field of the Other' (S2, 188, translation modified). The term also functions in legal discourse to designate the support of action; the subject is one who can be held responsible for his AcTswork.
The philosophical connotations of the term are particularly emphasised by =====Subject and Ego=====In 1953, [[Lacan, who links it with Descartes's philosophy of ]] establishes a [[distinction]] between the COGITO: in the term [[subject . . . I am not designating ]] and the living substratum needed by this phenomenon [[ego]] which will remain one of the subject, nor any sort most fundamental distinctions throughout the rest of substance, nor any being possessing knowledge in his pathos . . work. nor even some incarnated logos, but the Cartesian subject, who appears at the moment when doubt is recognised as certainty. (S11, 126)
The fact that Whereas the symbol of the subject, S, [[ego]] is a homophone part of the Freud's term Es (see ID) illustrates that for Lacan[[imaginary order]], the true [[subject ]] is the subject part of the unconscious. In 1957 Lacan strikes through this symbol to produce the symbol S, the 'barred subject', thus illustrating the fact that the subject is essentially divided[[symbolic]].
== def ==The term ‘subject’ Thus the [[subject]] is present from the very earliest not simply equivalent to a [[conscious]] sense of Lacan’s psychoanalytic writings[[agency]], and from 1945 on it occupies a central part in Lacan’s work.This which is a distinctive feature of Lacan’s work, since mere [[illusion]] produced by the term does not constitue part of Freud’s thoeretical vocabulary[[ego]], but to the [[unconscious]]; [[Lacan]]'s "[[subject]]" is more associated with philosopical, legal and linguistic discoursesthe [[subject]] of the [[unconscious]].
=====Sigmund Freud=====
[[Lacan]] argues that this distinction can be traced back to [[Freud]]:
<blockquote>"[Freud] wrote ''[[Das Ich]] und [[das Es]]'' in [[order]] to maintain this fundamental distinction between the [[true]] [[subject of the unconscious]] and the ego as constituted in its nucleus by a series of [[alienating]] identifications.<ref>{{E}} p.128</ref></blockquote>
Although [[psychoanalytic treatment]] has powerful effects on the [[ego]], it is the [[subject]], and not the [[ego]], on which [[psychoanalysis]] primarily operates.
== ===Alternative Meanings=====[[Lacan]] plays on the various [[meanings]] of the term "[[subject]]."  In [[linguistics]] and [[logic]], the [[subject]] of a proposition is that [[about]] which something is predicated, and is also opposed to the "[[object]]."<ref>{{L}} "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|Proposition du 9 octobre 1967 sur le psychanalyste de l'École]]," 1967, ''[[Scilicet]]'', no. 1 ([[1968]]) p. 19</ref>  [[Lacan]] plays on the [[philosophical]] nuances of the latter term to emphasise that his [[concept]] of the [[subject]] concerns those aspects of the [[human]] [[being]] that cannot (or must not) be objectified (reified, reduced to a [[thing]]), nor be studied in an '[[objective]]' way. <blockquote>"What do we call a subject? Quite precisely, what in the [[development]] of objectivation, is [[outside]] of the object."<ref>{{S1}} p. 194</ref></blockquote> =====Language=====References to [[language]] come to dominate [[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[subject]] from the mid-1950s on.  He distinguishes the [[subject]] of the [[statement]] from the [[subject]] of the [[enunciation]] to show that because the [[subject]] is essentially a [[speaking]] [[being]] (''[[parlêtre]]''), he is inescapably [[divided]], [[castrated]], [[split]].  In the early 1960s [[Lacan]] defines the [[subject]] as that which is represented by a [[signifier]] for [[another]] [[signifier]]; in other [[words]], the [[subject]] is an effect of [[language]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 835</ref>. =====Philosophy and Law=====Besides its [[place]] in [[linguistics]] and [[logic]], the term "[[subject]]" also has [[philosophical]] and [[legal]] connotations.  In [[philosophical]] [[discourse]], it denotes an [[individual]] [[consciousness|self-consciousness]], whereas in [[legal]] [[discourse]], it denotes a person who is under the [[power]] of another (e.g. a person who is subject to the sovereign).  The fact that the term possesses both these meanings means that it perfectly illustrates [[Lacan]]'s [[thesis]] about the determination of [[consciousness]] by the [[symbolic order]]. <blockquote>"The subject is a subject only by virtue of his subjection to the field of the Other."<ref>{{S2}} p. 188</ref></blockquote> The term also functions in [[legal]] [[discourse]] to designate the support of [[action]]; the [[subject]] is one who can be held [[responsibility|responsible]] for his [[act]]s. =====Descartes's ''Cogito''=====The [[philosophical]] connotations of the term are particularly emphasised by [[Lacan]], who [[links]] it with [[Descartes]]'s [[philosophy]] of the ''[[cogito]]'':  <blockquote>in the term ''subject'' . . . I am not designating the [[living]] substratum needed by this phenomenon of the subject, nor any sort of substance, nor any being possessing [[knowledge]] in his pathos . . . nor even some incarnated [[logos]], but the [[Cartesian]] subject, who appears at the [[moment]] when [[doubt]] is recognised as [[certainty]].<ref>{{S11}} p. 126</ref></blockquote> =====Subject of the Unconscious=====The fact that the [[symbol]] of the [[subject]], '''S''', is a homophone of the [[Freud]]'s term ''[[Es]]'' ('[[Id]]') illustrates that for [[Lacan]], the true [[subject]] is the [[subject]] of the [[unconscious]].  In 1957 [[Lacan]] strikes through this [[symbol]] to produce the [[symbol]] '''$''', the "[[subject|barred subject]]," thus illustrating the fact that the [[subject]] is essentially [[divided]]. =====See Also====={{See}}* [[Analysand]]* ''[[Cogito]]''||* [[Enunciation]]* [[Ego]]||* [[Language]]* [[Law]]||* [[Linguistics]]* [[Philosophy]]||* [[Split]]* [[Statement]]||* [[Symbol]]* [[Unconscious]]{{Also}} =====References=====<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]][[Category:Subject]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu