Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Superego

156 bytes removed, 09:45, 26 April 2006
no edit summary
superego (surmoi) The term 'superego' does not appear until quite late
The term 'superego' does not appear until quite late in Freud's work, being first introduced in The Ego and the Id (Freud, 1923b). Itwas in this work that Freud introduced his so-called 'structural model', in which the psyche is divided into three agencies; the EGo, the ID and the superego. However, the concept of a moral agency which judges and censures the ego can be found in Freud's work long before he locates these functions in the superego, such as in his concept of censorship.Lacan's first discussion of the superego comes in his article on the family (Lacan, 1938). In this work he distinguishes clearly between the superego and the EGO-IDEAL, terms which Freud seems to use interchangeably in The Ego and the Id. He argues that the primary function of the superego is to repress sexual desire for the mother in the resolution of the Oedipus complex. Following Freud, he argues that the superego results from Oedipal identification with the father, but he also refers to Melanie Klein's thesis on the maternal origins of an archaic form of the superego (Lacan, 1938: 59-60).When Lacan returns to the subject of the superego in his 1953-4 seminar, he locates it in the symbolic order, as opposed to the imaginary order of the ego: 'the superego is essentially located within the symbolic plane of speech' (Sl, 102). The superego has a close relationship with the Law, but this relationship is a paradoxical one. On the one hand, the Law as such is a symbolic structure which regulates subjectivity and in this sense prevents disintegration. On the other hand, the law of the superego has a 'senseless, blind character, of pure imperativeness and simple tyranny' (Sl, 102). Thus 'the superego is at one and the same time the law and its destruction' (Sl, 102). The superego arises from the misunderstanding of the law, from the gaps in the symbolic chain, and fills attempt to avoid the ambiguity and equivocation of discourse, it is precisely this ambiguity which psychoanalysis thrives on.
was in this work that Freud introduced his so-called 'structural model', in
 
which the psyche is divided into three agencies; the EGo, the ID and the
 
superego. However, the concept of a moral agency which judges and censures
 
the ego can be found in Freud's work long before he locates these functions in
 
the superego, such as in his concept of censorship.
 
Lacan's first discussion of the superego comes in his article on the family
 
(Lacan, 1938). In this work he distinguishes clearly between the superego and
 
the EGO-IDEAL, terms which Freud seems to use interchangeably in The Ego and
 
the Id. He argues that the primary function of the superego is to repress sexual
 
desire for the mother in the resolution of the Oedipus complex. Following
 
Freud, he argues that the superego results from Oedipal identification with the
 
father, but he also refers to Melanie Klein's thesis on the maternal origins of an
 
archaic form of the superego (Lacan, 1938: 59-60).
 
When Lacan returns to the subject of the superego in his 1953-4 seminar, he
 
locates it in the symbolic order, as opposed to the imaginary order of the ego:
 
'the superego is essentially located within the symbolic plane of speech' (Sl,
 
102). The superego has a close relationship with the Law, but this relationship
 
is a paradoxical one. On the one hand, the Law as such is a symbolic structure
 
which regulates subjectivity and in this sense prevents disintegration. On the
 
other hand, the law of the superego has a 'senseless, blind character, of pure
 
imperativeness and simple tyranny' (Sl, 102). Thus 'the superego is at one and
 
the same time the law and its destruction' (Sl, 102). The superego arises from
 
the misunderstanding of the law, from the gaps in the symbolic chain, and fills
 
attempt to avoid the ambiguity and equivocation of discourse, it is precisely
 
this ambiguity which psychoanalysis thrives on.
 
Suggestion has a close relation with TRANSFERENCE (E, 270). If transference
 
involves the analysand attributing knowledge to the analyst, suggestion refers
 
to a particular way of responding to this attribution. Lacan argues that the
 
analyst must realise that he only occupies the position of one who is presumed
 
(by the analysand) to know, without fooling himself that he really does possess
 
the knowledge attributed to him. In this way, the analyst is able to transform
 
the transference into 'an analysis of suggestion' (E, 271). Suggestion, on the
 
other hand, arises when the analyst assumes the position of one who really
 
does know.
 
Like Freud, Lacan sees hypnosis as the model of suggestion. In Group
 
Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Freud shows how hypnotism makes
 
the object converge with the ego-ideal (Freud, 1921). To put this in Lacanian
 
terms, hypnotism involves the convergence of the object a and the I. Psycho-
 
analysis involves exactly the opposite, since 'the fundamental mainspring of
 
the analytic operation is the maintenance of the distance between I - identi-
 
fication - and the a' (S11, 273).
Suggestion has a close relation with TRANSFERENCE (E, 270). If transference involves the analysand attributing knowledge to the analyst, suggestion refers to a particular way of responding to this attribution. Lacan argues that the analyst must realise that he only occupies the position of one who is presumed (by the analysand) to know, without fooling himself that he really does possess the knowledge attributed to him. In this way, the analyst is able to transform the transference into 'an analysis of suggestion' (E, 271). Suggestion, on the other hand, arises when the analyst assumes the position of one who really does know.
Like Freud, Lacan sees hypnosis as the model of suggestion. In Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Freud shows how hypnotism makes the object converge with the ego-ideal (Freud, 1921). To put this in Lacanian terms, hypnotism involves the convergence of the object a and the I. Psychoanalysis involves exactly the opposite, since 'the fundamental mainspring of the analytic operation is the maintenance of the distance between I - identification - and the a' (S11, 273).
Anonymous user

Navigation menu