Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Castration complex

3,546 bytes added, 02:04, 27 October 2006
no edit summary
{{Les termes}}
castration complex (complexe de castration)
==Definition==
 
===Sigmund Freud===
 
====Infantile Theory====
 
[[Freud]] first described the [[castration complex]] in 1908, arguing that the [[child]], on discovering the anatomical difference between the sexes (the [[presence]] or [[absence]] of the [[penis]]), makes the assumption that this difference is due to the [[female]]'s [[penis]] having been cut off.<ref>{{F}} "On the Sexual Theories of Children. 1908. SE IX. p.207</ref>
 
The [[castration complex]] is thus the moment when one infantile theory (everyone has a [[penis]]) is replaced by a new one ([[female]]s have been castrated).
 
The consequences of this new infantile theory are different in the [[boy]] and in the [[girl]].
 
The [[boy]] fears that his own [[penis]] will be cut off by the [[father]] ([[castration]] [[anxiety]]), while the [[girl]] sees herself as already castrated (by the [[mother]]) and attempts to deny this or to compensate for it by seeking a [[child]] as a substitute for the [[penis]] ([[penis envy]]).
 
====Phallic Phase====
The castration complex affects both sexes because its appearance is closely linked with the [[phallic phase]], a moment of psychosexual [[development]] when the child, whether boy or girl, knows only one genital organ - the male one.
 
This phase is also known as the infantile genital organisation because it is the first moment when the partial drives are unified under the primacy of the genital organs.
 
It thus anticipates the genital organisation proper which arises at puberty, when the subject is aware of both the male and the female sexual organs.<ref>{{F}} "The Infantile Genital Organization." 1923. SE XIX. p.141</ref>
 
====Oedipus Complex====
 
Freud argued that the castration complex is closely linked to the [[Oedipus Complex]], but that its role in the Oedipus complex is different for the boy and the girl.
 
In the case of the boy, the castration complex is the point of exit from the Oedipus complex, its terminal crisis; because of his fear of castration (often aroused by a threat) the boy renounces his [[desire]] for the mother and thus enters the [[latency period]].
 
In the case of the girl, the castration complex is the point of entry into the Oedipus complex; it is her resentment of the mother, whom she blames for depriving her of the penis, that causes her to redirect her [[libido|libidinal]] desires away from the mother and onto the father.
 
Because of this difference, in the case of the girl the Oedipus complex has no definitive terminal crisis comparable to the boy's.<ref>{{F}} "The Dissolution of the Oedipus Complex." 1924. SE XIX p.173</ref>
 
====Conclusion====
Freud came to see the castration complex as a universal phenomenon, one which is rooted in a basic 'rejection of femininity' (Ablehnung der Weiblich-keit).
 
It is encountered in every subject, and represents the ultimate limit beyond which psychoanalytic treatment cannot go.<ref>{{F}} "Analysis Terminable and Interminable." 1937. SE XXIII. p.211</ref>
 
 
==Jacques Lacan==
== Lacan ==
He dedicates a few paragraphs to it in his article on the family, where he follows Freud in stating that castration is first and foremost a [[fantasy]] of the mutilation of the penis.
Lacan links this fantasy with a whole series of fantasies of bodily dismemberment which originate in the [[image]] of the [[fragmented body]]; this image is contemporary with the [[mirror stage]] (six to eighteen months), and it is only much later that these fantasies of dismemberment coalesce around the specific fantasy of castration.<ref>Lacan, {{L}} 1938: . p.44</ref>
It is not until the mid-1950s that the castration complex comes to play a prominent role in Lacan's teaching, primarily in [[the seminar of 1956-7]].
 
It is in this seminar that Lacan identifies castration as one of three forms of '[[lack]] of [[object]]', the others being [[frustration]] and [[privation]].
Unlike frustration (which is an imaginary lack of a real object) and privation (which is a real lack of a symbolic object), castration is defined by Lacan as a [[symbolic]] lack of an imaginary object; castration does not bear on the penis as a real organ, but on the [[imaginary]] [[phallus]].<ref>S4, 219</ref>
Lacan's account of the castration complex is thus raised out of the dimension of simple [[biology]] or anatomy: 'It is insoluble by any reduction to biological givens.'<ref>E, 282</ref>
 Unlike frustration (which is an imaginary lack of a real object) and privation (which is a real lack of a symbolic object), castration is defined by Lacan as a [[symbolic]] lack of an imaginary object; castration does not bear on the penis as a real organ, but on the [[imaginary]] [[phallus]].<ref>{{S4}} p.219</ref> Lacan's account of the castration complex is thus raised out of the dimension of simple [[biology]] or anatomy: 'It is insoluble by any reduction to biological givens.'<ref>{{E}} p.282</ref> Following Freud, Lacan argues that the castration complex is the pivot on which the whole Oedipus complex turns.<ref>{{S4, }} p.216</ref> 
However, whereas Freud argues that these two complexes are articulated differently in boys and girls, Lacan argues that the castration complex always denotes the final moment of the Oedipus complex in both sexes.
Lacan divides the Oedipus complex into three 'times'.<ref>Lacan, 1957-8: {{S5}}; seminar of 22 January 1958</ref>
# In the first time, the child perceives that the [[mother]] desires something beyond the child himself - namely, the [[imaginary]] [[phallus]] - and then tries to be the phallus for the mother (see [[preoedipal phase]]).
 
# In the second time, the [[imaginary]] [[father]] intervenes to deprive the mother of her object by promulgating the [[incest taboo]]; properly speaking, this is not castration but [[privation]].
 
# Castration is only realised in the third and final time, which represents the 'dissolution' of the Oedipus complex.
It is then that the [[real]] [[father]] intervenes by showing that he really posesses the [[phallus]], in such a way that the child is forced to abandon his attempts to be the phallus.<ref>S4, 208-9, 227</ref>
It is then that the [[real]] [[father]] intervenes by showing that he really posesses the [[phallus]], in such a way that the child is forced to abandon his attempts to be the phallus.<ref>{{S4}} p.208-9, 227</ref>
===Two Operations===
From this account of the Oedipus complex, it is clear that Lacan uses the term 'castration' to refer to two different operations:
# ====Castration of the mother Mother====In the first time of the Oedipus complex, '"the mother is considered, by both sexes, as possessing the phallus, as the phallic mother' (."<ref>{{E, }} p.282). By promulgating the incest taboo in the second time, the imaginary father is seen to deprive her of this phallus. Lacan argues that properly speaking, this is not castration but privation. However, Lacan himself often uses these terms interchangeably, speaking both of the privation of the mother and of her castration.</ref>
# By promulgating the incest taboo in the second time, the imaginary father is seen to deprive her of this phallus.  Lacan argues that properly speaking, this is not castration but privation.  However, Lacan himself often uses these terms interchangeably, speaking both of the privation of the mother and of her castration. ====Castration of the subject Subject====
This is castration proper, in the sense of being a symbolic act which bears on an imaginary object.
Whereas the castration/privation of the mother which comes about in the second time of the Oedipus complex negates the verb 'to have' (the mother does not have the phallus), the castration of the subject in the third time of the Oedipus complex negates the verb 'to be' (the subject must renounce his attempts to be the phallus for the mother).
 In renouncing his attempts to be the object of the mother's desire, the subject gives up a certain ''[[jouissance]]'' which is never regained despite all attempts to do so; 'Castration means that ''jouissance'' must be refused so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder (''l'Èchelle èchelle renversè'') of the [[Law]] of [[desire]].'<ref>{{E, }} 324</ref> This applies equally to boys and girls: this 'relationship to the phallus . . . is established without regard to the anatomical difference of the sexes.'<ref>{{E, }} p.282</ref> 
On a more fundamental level, the term castration may also refer not to an 'operation' (the result of an intervention by the imaginary or real father) but to a state of lack which already exists in the mother prior to the subject's birth.
 
This lack is evident in her own desire, which the subject perceives as a desire for the imaginary phallus.
 
That is, the subject realises at a very early stage that the mother is not complete and self-sufficient in herself, nor fully satisfied with her child (the subject himself), but desires something else.
 
This is the subject's first perception that the Other is not complete but lacking.
 
===Normalizing Effect===
Both forms of castration (of the mother and of the subject) present the subject with a choice: to accept castration or to deny it.
 
Lacan argues that it is only by accepting (or 'assuming') castration that the subject can reach a degree of psychic normality.
 
In other words, the assumption of castration has a 'normalising effect'.
This normalising effect is to be understood in terms of both [[psychopathologpsychopathology]]y (clinical structures and symptoms) and [[sexual identity]].
==== Castration and clinical structures Clinical Structures====
It is the refusal of castration that lies at the root of all psychopathological structures.
 
However, since it is impossible to accept castration entirely, a completely 'normal' position is never achieved.
 
The closest to such a position is the [[neurosis|neurotic]] [[structure]], but even here the subject still defends himself against the lack in the [[Other]] by repressing awareness of castration.
 This prevents the neurotic from fully assuming his desire, since 'it is the assumption of castration that creates the lack upon which desire is instituted.'<ref>{{Ec, }} p.852</ref> 
A more radical defence against castration than [[repression]] is [[disavowal]], which is at the root of the [[perversion|perverse]] [[structure]].
The [[psychotic]] takes the most extreme path of all; he completely repudiates castration, as if it had never existed.<ref>Sl, {{S1}} 53</ref> 
This repudiation of symbolic castration leads to the return of castration in the real, such as in the form of [[hallucinations]] of dismemberment (as in the case of the [[Wolf Man]]) or even self-mutilation of the real genital organs.
==== Castration and sexual identity Sexual Identity====
It is only by assuming castration (in both senses) that the subject can take up a sexual position as a man or a woman (see [[sexual difference]].
 
The different modalities of refusing castration find expression in the various forms of [[perversion]].
==See Also==
* [[Oedipus complex]]
* [[Penis]]
* [[Phallus]]
 
 
==References==
<references/>
 
 
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Treatment]]
[[Category:Practice]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
 
 
==Dictionary==
 
 
The psychoanalytic definition of castration is rooted in the act feared by male children, namely, the removal of the penis.
 
In psychoanalysis, the [[castration complex]] (along with the [[Oedipus complex]]) is a major organizing principle of psychosexuality (and, more broadly speaking, of mental life in general).
 
 
----------------
In psychoanalysis, the word "castration" is associated with several others that define it and that it in turn defines. These include "anxiety," "threat," "symbolic," "fear," "terror," "disavowal," and above all "complex." Beyond the everyday connotations of the term, the specifically psychoanalytic definition of castration is rooted in the act feared by male children, namely the removal of the penis. The essential connection between "castration" and "complex" derives from the fact that psychoanalysis views the castration complex, in tandem with the Oedipus complex, as the organizing principle of psychosexuality and, more broadly speaking, of mental life in general.
Although such instinctual sacrifices were injurious to the individual, they were essential to the "process of civilization," that is, to the development of conscience and thought. This process was subject, like the individual, to that instinctual duality which, we must not forget, was based at once upon an antagonism and an inextricable connection between the life and the death instincts. The great lesson of Civilization and Its Discontents was that "This conflict is set going as soon as men are faced with the task of living together" (1930a, p. 132). Living together indeed requires at the very least the symbolic marks of sacrifice (circumcision, for instance), and such marks are planted on the sexual body, thus clearly demonstrating the power of the notion of castration in the various registers of human reality.
JEAN COURNUT"Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-Year-Old Boy" (Little Hans); Anxiety; Aphanisis; Biological bedrock; Disavowal; Exhibitionism; Fascination; Father complex; Fetishism; Fright; "From the History of an Infantile Neurosis (Wolf Man)"; Identificatory project; Masculine protest (individual psychology); Oedipus complex; Penis envy; Perversion; Phallic mother; Phallic stage; Phobias in children; Phobic neurosis; Primal fantasies; Psychanalyse et Pédiatrie (Psychoanalysis and pediatrics); Psycho-sexual development; Self-mutilation in children; Sex differentiation; "Some Psychical Consequences of the Anatomical Difference between the Sexes"; "Splitting of the Ego in the Process of Defence"; "Taboo of Virginity, The"; Unconscious fantasy.  * Freud, Sigmund. (1900a). The interpretation of dreams. SE,4 and 5.* ——. (1901b). The psychopathology of everyday life. SE,6.* ——. (1905d). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE, 7: 123-243.* ——. (1908c). On the sexual theories of children. SE, 9: 205-226.* ——. (1909b). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. SE, 10: 1-149.* ——. (1910h). A special type of choice of object made by men (Contributions to the psychology of love I). SE, 11: 163-175.* ——. (1911c [1910]). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (Dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82.* ——. (1912d). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. (Contributions to the psychology of love II). SE, 11: 177-190.* ——. (1912-13a). Totem and taboo. SE, 13: 1-161.* ——. (1914c). On narcissism: an introduction. SE, 14: 81-105.* ——. (1916-17e). On transformations of instinct as exemplified in anal erotism. SE, 17: 125-133.* ——. (1918a). The taboo of virginity (Contributions to the psychology of love III). SE, 11: 191-208.* ——. (1918b [1914]). From the history of an infantile neurosis. SE, 17: 1-122.* ——. (1919e). A child is being beaten. SE, 17: 175-204.* ——. (1920g). Beyond the pleasure principle. SE, 18.* ——. (1923e). The infantile genital organization (an interpolation into the theory of sexuality). SE, 19: 141-145.* ——. (1924d). The dissolution of the oedipus complex. SE, 19: 171-179.* ——. (1925j). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. SE, 19: 241-258.* ——. (1926d [1925]). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. SE, 20: 75-172.* ——. (1927e). Fetishism. SE, 21: 147-157.* ——. (1930a). Civilization and its discontents. SE 21: 57-145.* ——. (1931b). Female sexuality. SE, 21: 221-243.* ——. (1933a [1932]). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE, 22: 83-268.* ——. (1937c). Analysis terminable and interminable. SE, 23: 209-253.* ——. (1939a). Moses and monotheism. SE, 23: 1-137.* Lacan, Jacques. (1991). Le Séminaire VIII. Le transfert (1960-61). Paris: Seuil.* Laplanche, Jean (1980). Problématiques II, Castration, symbolisations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
See also: "Analysis of a Phobia in a Five[[Seminar XI]] castration 11, 73, 77-Year-Old Boy" (Little Hans); Anxiety; Aphanisis; Biological bedrock; Disavowal; Exhibitionism; Fascination; Father complex; Fetishism; Fright; "From the History of an Infantile Neurosis (Wolf Man)"; Identificatory project; Masculine protest (individual psychology); Oedipus complex; Penis envy; Perversion; Phallic mother; Phallic stage; Phobias in children; Phobic neurosis; Primal fantasies; Psychanalyse et Pédiatrie (Psychoanalysis and pediatrics); Psycho-sexual development; Self-mutilation in children; Sex differentiation; "Some Psychical Consequences of the Anatomical Difference between the Sexes"; "Splitting of the Ego in the Process of Defence"; "Taboo of Virginity8, 89, 102, 104, 118, The"; Unconscious fantasy.Bibliography253
* Angoisse et complexe de {{Les termes}}castration (1991). Monographs of the Revue française de psychanalyse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. * Cournut, Jean. (1997).Épître aux oedipiens. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. * Freud, Sigmund. (1900a). The interpretation of dreams. SE,4 and 5. * ——. (1901b). The psychopathology of everyday life. SE,6. * ——. (1905d). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE, 7: 123-243. * ——. (1908c). On the sexual theories of children. SE, 9: 205-226. * ——. (1909b). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. SE, 10: 1-149. * ——. (1910h). A special type of choice of object made by men (Contributions to the psychology of love I). SE, 11: 163-175. * ——. (1911c [1910]). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (Dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82. * ——. (1912d). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. (Contributions to the psychology of love II). SE, 11: 177-190. * ——. (1912-13a). Totem and taboo. SE, 13: 1-161. * ——. (1914c). On narcissism: an introduction. SE, 14: 81-105. * ——. (1916-17e). On transformations of instinct as exemplified in anal erotism. SE, 17: 125-133. * ——. (1918a). The taboo of virginity (Contributions to the psychology of love III). SE, 11: 191-208. * ——. (1918b [1914]). From the history of an infantile neurosis. SE, 17: 1-122. * ——. (1919e). A child is being beaten. SE, 17: 175-204. * ——. (1920g). Beyond the pleasure principle. SE, 18. * ——. (1923e). The infantile genital organization (an interpolation into the theory of sexuality). SE, 19: 141-145. * ——. (1924d). The dissolution of the oedipus complex. SE, 19: 171-179. * ——. (1925j). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. SE, 19: 241-258. * ——. (1926d [1925]). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. SE, 20: 75-172. * ——. (1927e). Fetishism. SE, 21: 147-157. * ——. (1930a). Civilization and its discontents. SE 21: 57-145. * ——. (1931b). Female sexuality. SE, 21: 221-243. * ——. (1933a [1932]). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE, 22: 83-268. * ——. (1937c). Analysis terminable and interminable. SE, 23: 209-253. * ——. (1939a). Moses and monotheism. SE, 23: 1-137. * Green, André. (1990). Le complexe de castration. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. * Lacan, Jacques. (1991). Le Séminaire VIII. Le transfert (1960-61). Paris: Seuil. * Laplanche, Jean (1980). Problématiques II, Castration, symbolisations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Further Reading
* Jacobson, Edith. (1976). Female superego formation and female castration conflict. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 45, 525-538.
* Horney, Karen. (1924). On the genesis of the castration complex in women. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 5, 50-65.
* Mayer, Elizabeth Lloyd. (1995). The phallic castration complex and primary femininity: Paired developmental lines toward female gender identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 17-38.
* Rangell, Leo. (1991). Castration. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39,3-24.
[[Category:Enotes]]
          ==Misc== ===Phallic Phase=== The [[Seminar XIcastration complex]] affects both sexes because its appearance is closely linked with the [[phallic phase]] castration 11, 73a moment of psychosexual [[development]] when the child, whether boy or girl, 77knows only one genital organ - the male one.  The [[castration complex]]  The [[phallic phase]] is a moment of [[development|psychosexual development]] when the [[child]] -- whether [[boy]] or [[girl]] -- knows only one [[genital]] [[body|organ]] - the [[male]] one.   The [[phallic phase]] is also known as the infantile genital organization. (because it -- the [[phallic phase]] -8, 89, 102, 104, 118- is the first moment when) The [[partial]] [[drive]]s are unified under the primacy of the [genital]] [[body|organ]]s.  It thus anticipates the genital organisation proper which arises at puberty, 253when the subject is aware of both the male and the female sexual organs.<ref>{{F}} "The Infantile Genital Organization." 1923. SE XIX. p.141</ref>
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu