24,656
edits
Changes
m
The term ''[[mythéme]]'' is a neologism coined by [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] by analogy with [[phoneme]], and used to describe the elementary units employed in the [[structuralism|structural analysis]] of [[wp:myth]]s.
[[Lévi<!-- Levi-Strauss]] used 's famous article on the word "mythemematter is " to indicate the smallest unit The Structural Study of myth (by analogy to the phoneme being the smallest unit of speech that can distinguish one statement from another statementMyth, like the "d" versus the "b" in dog/bog)Structural Anthropology, translated by C. It's a faulty but useful analogyJacobson and B. It's faulty because a phoneme is itself meaningless, whereas a mytheme Schoepf (understood as a sort of primary element of the mythic story) can be an event, for exampleDoubleday, which is not meaningless in itself. It's useful because once the mythemes are identified, they can be aligned with other mythemes in particular kinds of arrangements (to other mythemes in time [diachronic] or to other mythemes in the same myth [synchronic], and so on1967). These arrangements are structures, hence the term "structuralism" to describe the overall process. Isolating the structures can reveal interesting things that have to do with many things from sociology to psychology. -->
Levi-Strauss's famous article on the matter is "The Structural Study of Myth," in Structural Anthropology, translated by C. Jacobson and B. Schoepf (Doubleday, 1967).[[Category:Structuralism]]
no edit summary
The ''[[mytheme]]'' is term used by [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] to describe the
by analogy with [[phoneme]], and used to describe the elementary units employed in the [[structuralism|structural analysis]] of [[wp:myth]]s.
the smallest possible units of meaning [[signification]] within a [[language|language system]] (Levi-Strauss/Structuralismor [[wp:myth]]): the smallest unit of signification in myths (analogous to *phoneme); building block of structural anthropology.
Term used occasionally in a structuralist context.
=====Phoneme=====
<!-- (analogous to *phoneme) -->
[[Lévi-Strauss]] coined the neologism by analogy to the phoneme (being the smallest unit of speech that can distinguish one statement from another statement, like the "d" versus the "b" in dog/bog). It's a faulty but useful analogy. It's faulty because a phoneme is itself meaningless, whereas a mytheme (understood as a sort of primary element of the mythic story) can be an event, for example, which is not meaningless in itself. It's useful because once the mythemes are identified, they can be aligned with other mythemes in particular kinds of arrangements (to other mythemes in time [diachronic] or to other mythemes in the same myth [synchronic], and so on). These arrangements are structures, hence the term "structuralism" to describe the overall process. Isolating the structures can reveal interesting things that have to do with many things from sociology to psychology.
