Difference between revisions of "Talk:Seminar XXI"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
1973-1974 (203 pp.)-SEMINAIRE XXI: LES NON-DUPES ERRENT (THE NON�FOOLS WANDER)-ANONYMOUS VERSION 1981 | 1973-1974 (203 pp.)-SEMINAIRE XXI: LES NON-DUPES ERRENT (THE NON�FOOLS WANDER)-ANONYMOUS VERSION 1981 | ||
Non-dupes-errent (Nonfools wander) / Noms-du-pere (Names-of-the-Father)�this seminar was an echo of the 1963 seminar that was interrupted during the second split (53). "It does not mean that the fools don't wander." It is in a parodic or very abstract form (topology) that Lacan resumed the theme of the Names-of-the-Father. One can interpret this interruption either by considering that Lacan had jealously kept for himself a theme that had been interrupted by the others, or by considering that it might be a theme that is impossible to approach. The reading of L' Eveil du printemps (88) is illuminating for the question of the Names-of-the-Father. | Non-dupes-errent (Nonfools wander) / Noms-du-pere (Names-of-the-Father)�this seminar was an echo of the 1963 seminar that was interrupted during the second split (53). "It does not mean that the fools don't wander." It is in a parodic or very abstract form (topology) that Lacan resumed the theme of the Names-of-the-Father. One can interpret this interruption either by considering that Lacan had jealously kept for himself a theme that had been interrupted by the others, or by considering that it might be a theme that is impossible to approach. The reading of L' Eveil du printemps (88) is illuminating for the question of the Names-of-the-Father. | ||
| Line 68: | Line 67: | ||
* [http://gaogoa.free.fr/Seminaires/NDP/NDP11061974.pdf 1974.06.11.pdf] | * [http://gaogoa.free.fr/Seminaires/NDP/NDP11061974.pdf 1974.06.11.pdf] | ||
* [http://lutecium.org/Jacques_Lacan/transcriptions/ndp/ndp_15/ndp_15.pdf 196.0..pdf] | * [http://lutecium.org/Jacques_Lacan/transcriptions/ndp/ndp_15/ndp_15.pdf 196.0..pdf] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" width="100%"cellpadding="2" align="center" bgcolor="ffffff" style="background:#ffffff; width:100%; text-align:center; line-height:2.0em;" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" | [[{{Y}}|13 novembre 1973]] | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="" | ''[[Seminar|Séminaire XXI (1973-1974) "Les non-dupes errent"]] | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" | [http://www.nosubject.com/archive/media/Lacan-Jacques_Seminaire-XXI-Les-non-dupes-errent_13-novembre-1973.mp3 mp3] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | colspan="3" style="text-align:justify" | | ||
| + | The title of this Séminaire is a pun on the title of his Séminaire in 1963 (« Les Noms-du-Père ») which was stopped after a single session because Lacan had been banned from the IPA. | ||
| + | In this session, Lacan explains the title and displays his borromean knot as the way to knot the 3 category registers of human reality : Real, Symbolic, Imaginary. [http://www.elm.qc.ca/m-publications/lacan/pub-lac-sem-1973%20les%20non%20dupes%2013%20nov.htm Text in French] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" width="100%"cellpadding="2" align="center" bgcolor="ffffff" style="background:#ffffff; width:100%; text-align:center; line-height:2.0em;" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" | [[{{Y}}|20 novembre 1973]] | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="" | ''[[Seminar|Séminaire XXI (1973-1974) "Les non-dupes errent"]] | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" | [http://www.nosubject.com/archive/media/Lacan-Jacques_Seminaire-XXI-Les-non-dupes-errent_20-novembre-1973.mp3 mp3] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | colspan="3" style="text-align:justify" | | ||
| + | [[Lacan]] reads (sometimes in german) and comments on [[Freud]]'s text about the occult. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:34, 31 October 2006
1973-1974 (203 pp.)-SEMINAIRE XXI: LES NON-DUPES ERRENT (THE NON�FOOLS WANDER)-ANONYMOUS VERSION 1981 Non-dupes-errent (Nonfools wander) / Noms-du-pere (Names-of-the-Father)�this seminar was an echo of the 1963 seminar that was interrupted during the second split (53). "It does not mean that the fools don't wander." It is in a parodic or very abstract form (topology) that Lacan resumed the theme of the Names-of-the-Father. One can interpret this interruption either by considering that Lacan had jealously kept for himself a theme that had been interrupted by the others, or by considering that it might be a theme that is impossible to approach. The reading of L' Eveil du printemps (88) is illuminating for the question of the Names-of-the-Father. There is nothing really new here, except the importance given from now on to the Borromean knots that allow Lacan to link the Imaginary, the Sym�bolic, and the Real with a fourth circle (the one that creates the knot), pre�cisely the Name-of-the-Father. They can also be approached through the figure of the braid. They belong to the order of the structure in the following schema:
birth
structure
death
Lacan threw string rings in the seminar room. As for the rest of the seminar, I can only refer the reader to my previous summaries. However, this anony�mous transcription is very useful: for the first time, bibliographic Dotes assist reading. They testify to the amount, the multiplicity, and the diversity of the Lacanian references. The writing, more finely wrought, makes this text a point of access, for example, to Discours qui ne serait pas du semblan/ (78). '--- 86
| 13 novembre 1973 | Séminaire XXI (1973-1974) "Les non-dupes errent" | mp3 |
|
The title of this Séminaire is a pun on the title of his Séminaire in 1963 (« Les Noms-du-Père ») which was stopped after a single session because Lacan had been banned from the IPA. In this session, Lacan explains the title and displays his borromean knot as the way to knot the 3 category registers of human reality : Real, Symbolic, Imaginary. Text in French | ||
| 20 novembre 1973 | Séminaire XXI (1973-1974) "Les non-dupes errent" | mp3 |
|
Lacan reads (sometimes in german) and comments on Freud's text about the occult. | ||
