Difference between revisions of "Topology"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
TOPOLOGY (384) [CD]
+
[[Topology]] (''topologie'') is a branch of [[mathematics]] which deals with the properties of figures in space which are preserved under all continuous deformations.
 +
These properties are those of continuity, contiguity and delimitation.
 +
The notion of space in topology is one of topological space, which is not limited to Euclidean (two- and three-dimensional space), nor even to spaces which can be said to have a dimension at all.
 +
Topological space thus dispenses with all references to distance, size, area and angle, and is based only on a concept of closeness or neighbourhood.
  
topology (topologie) Topology (originally called analysis situs by
+
Freud used spatial metaphors to describe the psyche in ''[[The Interpretation of Dreams]]'', where he cites G. T. Fechner's idea that the scene of action of dreams is different from that of waking ideational life and proposes the concept of 'psychical locality'.
 +
Freud is careful to explain that this concept is a purely topographical one, and must not be confused with physical locality in any anatomical fashion.<ref>Freud, 1900a: SE V, 536</ref> His 'first topography' divided the psyche into three systems: the conscious (Cs), the [[preconscious]] (Pcs) and the [[unconscious]] (Ucs).
 +
The 'second topography' divided the psyche into the three agencies of the ego, the superego and the id.
  
Leibniz) is a branch of mathematics which deals with the properties of figures
+
Lacan criticises these models for not being topological enough.
 +
He argues that the diagram with which Freud had illustrated his second topology in ''[[The Ego and the Id]]'' (1923b) led the majority of Freud's readers to forget the analysis on which it was based because of the intuitive power of the image.<ref>see E, 214</ref>
 +
Lacan's interest in topology arises, then, because he sees it as providing a non-intuitive, purely intellectual means of expressing the concept of [[structure]] that is so important to his focus on the symbolic order.
 +
It is thus the task of Lacan's topological models "to forbid imaginary capture."<ref>E, 333</ref> 
 +
Unlike intuitive images, in which "perception eclipses structure", in Lacan's topology "there is no occultation of the symbolic."<ref>E, 333</ref>
  
    in space which are preserved under all continuous deformations. These proper-
 
  
    ties are those ofcontinuity, contiguity and delimitation. The notion of space in
+
Lacan argues that topology is not simply a metaphorical way of expressing the concept of structure; it is structure itself.<ref>Lacan, 1973b</ref>
 +
He emphasises that topology privileges the function of the cut (''coupure''), since the cut is what distinguishes a discontinuous transformation from a continuous one.  
  
topology is one of topological space, which is not limited to Euclidean (two-
+
Both kinds of transformation play a role in psychoanalytic [[treatment]].
 +
As an example of a continuous transformation, Lacan refers to the [[moebius strip]]; just as one passes from one side to the other by following the strip round continuously, so the [[subject]] can [[traverse]] the [[fantasy]] without making a mythical leap from inside to outside.
 +
As an example of a discontinous transformation, Lacan also refers to the moebius strip, which when cut down the middle is transformed into a single loop with very different topological properties; it now has two sides instead of one.
 +
Just as the cut operates a discontinuous transformation in the moebius strip, so an effective interpretation proferred by the analyst modifies the structure of the analysand's discourse in a radical way.
  
    and three-dimensional space), nor even to spaces which can be said to have a
+
While [[schema L] and the other schemata which are produced in the 1950s can be seen as Lacan's first incursion into topology, topological forms only come into prominence when, in the 1960s, he turns his attention to the figures of the [[torus]], the moebius strip, Klein's bottle, and the cross-cap.<ref>see Lacan, 1961-2</ref> 
 +
Later on, in the 1970s, Lacan turns his attention to the more complex area of knot theory, especially the [[borromean knot]].<ref>TOPOLOGY (384) [CD]</ref><ref>topology, 22, 34, 74, 89-90, 131, 144, 147, 155-6, 161, 164, 181-2, 184, 203, 206, 209, * 235, 244-5, 257, 270-1 [[Seminar XI]]</ref>
  
    dimension at all. Topological space thus dispenses with all references to
+
[[Category:Terms]]
 
+
[[Category:Concepts]]
distance, size, area and angle, and is based only on a concept of closeness or
+
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
 
neighbourhood.
 
 
 
      Freud used spatial metaphors to describe the psyche in The Interpretation of
 
 
 
Dreams, where he cites G. T. Fechner's idea that the scene of action of dreams
 
 
 
is different from that of waking ideational life and proposes the concept of
 
 
 
'psychical locality'. Freud is careful to explain that this concept is a purely
 
 
 
topographical one, and must not be confused with physical locality in any
 
 
 
anatomical fashion (Freud, 1900a: SE V, 536). His 'first topography' (usually
 
 
 
referred to in English as 'the topographic system') divided the psyche into
 
 
 
three systems: the conscious (Cs), the preconscious (Pcs) and the unconscious
 
 
 
(Ucs). The 'second topography' (usually referred to in English as 'the struc-
 
 
 
tural system') divided the psyche into the three agencies of the ego, the
 
 
 
superego and the id.
 
 
 
      Lacan criticises these models for not being topological enough. He argues
 
 
 
that the diagram with which Freud had illustrated his second topology in The
 
 
 
Ego and the Id (1923b) led the majority of Freud's readers to forget the
 
 
 
analysis on which it was based because of the intuitive power of the image
 
 
 
(see E, 214). Lacan's interest in topology arises, then, because he sees it as
 
 
 
providing a non-intuitive, purely intellectual means of expressing the concept
 
 
 
of STRUCTURE that is so important to his focus on the symbolic order. It is thus
 
 
 
the task of Lacan's topological models 'to forbid imaginary capture' (E, 333).
 
 
 
Unlike intuitive images, in which 'perception eclipses structure', in Lacan's
 
 
 
topology 'there is no occultation of the symbolic' (E, 333).
 
 
 
    Lacan argues that topology is not simply a metaphorical way of expressing
 
 
 
the concept of structure; it is structure itself (Lacan, 1973b). He emphasises
 
 
 
that topology privileges the function of the cut (coupure), since the cut is what
 
 
 
distinguishes    a discontinuous transformation from      a continuous    one. Both
 
 
 
kinds of transformation play a role in psychoanalytic treatment. As an exam-
 
 
 
ple of a continuous transformation, Lacan refers to the MOEBIUS STRIP; j¸St SS
 
 
 
one passes from one side to the other by following the strip round continu-
 
 
 
ously, so the subject can traverse the fantasy without making a mythical leap
 
 
 
from inside to outside. As an example of a discontinous transformation, Lacan
 
 
 
also refers to the moebius strip, which when cut down the middle is trans-
 
 
 
formed into a single loop with very different topological properties; it now has
 
 
 
two sides instead of one. Just as the cut operates a discontinuous transforma-
 
 
 
tion in the moebius strip, so an effective interpretation proferred by the analyst
 
 
 
modifies the structure of the analysand's discourse in a radical way.
 
 
 
    While SCHEMA L and the other schemata which are produced in the 1950s can
 
 
 
be seen as Lacan's first incursion into topology, topological forms only come
 
 
 
into prominence when, in the 1960s, he turns his attention to the figures of the
 
 
 
TORUs, the moebius strip, Klein's bottle, and the cross-cap (see Lacan, 1961-2).
 
 
 
Later on, in the 1970s, Lacan turns his attention to the more complex area of
 
 
 
knot theory, especially the BORROMEAN KNOT. For an introduction to Lacan's use
 
 
 
of topological figures, see Granon-Lafont (1985).
 
 
 
topology, 22, 34, 74, 89-90, 131, 144, 147, 155-6, 161, 164, 181-2, 184, 203, 206, 209, * 235, 244-5, 257, 270-1 [[Seminar XI]]
 

Revision as of 08:24, 22 May 2006

Topology (topologie) is a branch of mathematics which deals with the properties of figures in space which are preserved under all continuous deformations. These properties are those of continuity, contiguity and delimitation. The notion of space in topology is one of topological space, which is not limited to Euclidean (two- and three-dimensional space), nor even to spaces which can be said to have a dimension at all. Topological space thus dispenses with all references to distance, size, area and angle, and is based only on a concept of closeness or neighbourhood.

Freud used spatial metaphors to describe the psyche in The Interpretation of Dreams, where he cites G. T. Fechner's idea that the scene of action of dreams is different from that of waking ideational life and proposes the concept of 'psychical locality'. Freud is careful to explain that this concept is a purely topographical one, and must not be confused with physical locality in any anatomical fashion.[1] His 'first topography' divided the psyche into three systems: the conscious (Cs), the preconscious (Pcs) and the unconscious (Ucs). The 'second topography' divided the psyche into the three agencies of the ego, the superego and the id.

Lacan criticises these models for not being topological enough. He argues that the diagram with which Freud had illustrated his second topology in The Ego and the Id (1923b) led the majority of Freud's readers to forget the analysis on which it was based because of the intuitive power of the image.[2] Lacan's interest in topology arises, then, because he sees it as providing a non-intuitive, purely intellectual means of expressing the concept of structure that is so important to his focus on the symbolic order. It is thus the task of Lacan's topological models "to forbid imaginary capture."[3] Unlike intuitive images, in which "perception eclipses structure", in Lacan's topology "there is no occultation of the symbolic."[4]


Lacan argues that topology is not simply a metaphorical way of expressing the concept of structure; it is structure itself.[5] He emphasises that topology privileges the function of the cut (coupure), since the cut is what distinguishes a discontinuous transformation from a continuous one.

Both kinds of transformation play a role in psychoanalytic treatment. As an example of a continuous transformation, Lacan refers to the moebius strip; just as one passes from one side to the other by following the strip round continuously, so the subject can traverse the fantasy without making a mythical leap from inside to outside. As an example of a discontinous transformation, Lacan also refers to the moebius strip, which when cut down the middle is transformed into a single loop with very different topological properties; it now has two sides instead of one. Just as the cut operates a discontinuous transformation in the moebius strip, so an effective interpretation proferred by the analyst modifies the structure of the analysand's discourse in a radical way.

While [[schema L] and the other schemata which are produced in the 1950s can be seen as Lacan's first incursion into topology, topological forms only come into prominence when, in the 1960s, he turns his attention to the figures of the torus, the moebius strip, Klein's bottle, and the cross-cap.[6]

Later on, in the 1970s, Lacan turns his attention to the more complex area of knot theory, especially the borromean knot.[7][8]

  1. Freud, 1900a: SE V, 536
  2. see E, 214
  3. E, 333
  4. E, 333
  5. Lacan, 1973b
  6. see Lacan, 1961-2
  7. TOPOLOGY (384) [CD]
  8. topology, 22, 34, 74, 89-90, 131, 144, 147, 155-6, 161, 164, 181-2, 184, 203, 206, 209, * 235, 244-5, 257, 270-1 Seminar XI