Changes

The English word "{{Top}}[[traininganalyse]]" is used to translate two [[French]] terms used by [[Lacan]]: ''[[training|analyse didactique]]'' ("'''[[training analysis]]'''") and , ''[[training|formation]]'' ("'''professional training'''").{{Bottom}}

== Training Analysis ===Jacques Lacan==========Translation=====By the time The English word "[[Lacantraining]] began " is used to translate two [[trainingFrench]] as an [[analystterms]], in the 1930s, it had become established used by [[practiceLacan]] in the : ''[[[International Psychoanalytical Associationtraining|analyse didactique]] '' ("'''[[IPAtraining analysis]]) to make a distinction between "'''therapeutic analysis") and ''[[training|formation]]''" and ("'''professional training analysis'''" (this distinction is still maintained by the IPA today).

In =====Therapeutic Analysis=====By the context of this distinction[[time]] [[Lacan]] began [[training]] as an [[analyst]], in the term "'''therapeutic analysis'''" refers to a course of 1930s, it had become established [[analytic treatmentpractice]] entered into by in the [[analysandInternational Psychoanalytical Association]] for the purpose of treating certain ([[symptomIPA]]s, whereas the term 'training analysis' refers exclusively ) to make a course of analytic [[treatmentdistinction]] entered into for the purpose of between "'''therapeutic [[traininganalysis]] as an '''" and "'''training analysis'''" (this distinction is still maintained by the [[analystIPA]]today).

According to In the rules governing all context of this distinction, the societies affiliated term "'''therapeutic analysis'''" refers to a course of [[analytic treatment]] entered into by the [[analysand]] for the IPA[[purpose]] of treating certain [[symptom]]s, all members must first undergo a whereas the term "'''training analysis before being allowed '''" refers exclusively to practice a course of [[analytic treatment]] entered into for the purpose of [[training]] as an [[analyst]]s.

However=====Training Analysis=====According to the rules governing all the societies affiliated to the [[IPA]], an analysis is only recognized as all members must first undergo a [[training|training analysis by these societies if it is conducted by one of the few senior analysts designated ]] before being allowed to practice as a 'training analyst', and if it is embarked upon purely for the purpose of [[traininganalyst]]s.

This institutional distinction between However, an analysis is only recognized as a [[training analysis and therapeutic analysis became ]] by these societies if it is conducted by one of the main objects few senior [[analysts]] designated as a "[[training|training analyst]]", and if it is embarked upon purely for the purpose of Lacan's criticism[[training]].

While This institutional distinction between [[Lacantraining|training analysis]] agrees with the IPA that it is absolutely necessary to undergo and [[psychoanalysistraining|psychoanalytictherapeutic analysis]] became one of the main [[treatmentobjects]] if one wants to become an of [[analystLacan]], he firmly disagrees with the artificial distinction drawn between therapeutic analysis and training analysis's criticism.

For =====Jacques Lacan, there is only one form of the analytic process, irrespective of the reason for which the =====While [[analysandLacan]] embarks upon agrees with the [[treatmentIPA]], and the culmination of that process it is not the removal of absolutely necessary to undergo [[symptompsychoanalysis|psychoanalytic]]s but the passage from [[analysandtreatment]] if one wants to become an [[analyst]], he firmly disagrees with the artificial distinction drawn between [[training|therapeutic analysis]] and [[training|training analysis]].

All analyses are thus capable For [[Lacan]], there is only one [[form]] of producing an the [[analysttreatment|analytic process]], and all claims by institutions to say irrespective of the [[reason]] for which analyses count as the [[analysand]] embarks upon [[trainingtreatment]] , and which do the culmination of that [[process]] is not are bogus, for "the authorisation removal of an [[symptom]]s but the passage from [[analysand]] to [[analyst can only come from himself."<ref>1967]]. 14</ref>

All [[Lacananalyses]] are thus capable of producing an [[analyst]] therefore abolishes the distinction between therapeutic analysis , and training analyss; all claims by institutions to say which analyses count as [[training]] and which do not are training analysesbogus, at least potentiallyfor "the authorisation of an analyst can only come from himself."<ref>{{L}} 1967. p.14</ref>

"there is only one kind of psychoanalysis, [[Lacan]] therefore abolishes the distinction between [[training|therapeutic analysis]] and [[training|training analysis]]; all analyses are [[training|training analyses]], at least potentially."<ref>{{S11}} p. 274</ref>

Today<blockquote>"There is only one kind of [[psychoanalysis]], many Lacanians have dispensed with both the term 'therapeutic analysis' and the term 'training analysis', preferring to use the term personal analysis (a term Lacan himself uses occasionally) to designate any course of analytic treatment."<ref>{{S11}} p. 274</ref></blockquote>

== Training of Analysts ==The 'training of analysts' (Fr.''formation des analystes'') refers to Today, many [[Lacan]]ians have dispensed with both the process by which people learn how to conduct term "[[psychoanalysistraining|psychoanalytictherapeutic analysis]] " and the term "[[treatment]]training|training analysis", i.e. how preferring to be use the term "[[analysttraining|personal analysis]]s.For (a term [[Lacan]], this is not simply a process that himself uses occasionally) to designate any course of [[analystanalytic treatment]]s go through at the beginning of their professional life, but an ongoing process.

=====Training of Analysts=====The "[[training|training of analysts]]" ([[French]]: ''[[training|formation des analystes]]'') refers to the process by which [[people]] learn how to conduct [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic]] [[treatment]], i.e. how to be [[analyst]]s. For [[Lacan]], this is not simply a process that [[analyst]]s go through at the beginning of their professional [[life]], but an ongoing process. There are two sources from which [[analyst]]s learn how to conduct [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic]] [[treatment]]: their own [[experience ]] of [[treatment]] (first as [[patient]]s, then as [[analyst]]s), and the experience of [[others ]] which is transmitted to [[them ]] via [[psychoanalytic theory]].

[[Lacan]]'s syllabus for the [[training|training of [[analyst]]s is very extensive, and includes [[literature]], [[mathematics]] and [[history]].<ref>{{E}} p. 144-5</ref>

The [[analyst]] must seek to become, as [[Freud]] was, "an encyclopedia of the [[arts ]] and muses."<ref>{{E}} p. 169</ref>

This broad curriculum is evident in [[Lacan]]'s [[public ]] [[seminar]] which is filled with incursions into [[philosophy]], [[topology]], [[logic]], [[literature]] and [[linguistics]] - all of which [[Lacan]] regards as essential to the [[training]] of [[analyst]]s.

=====Translation=====It is worth noting that the [[English ]] term '"[[training]]' " is nuanced rather differently to the French term ''[[training|formation]]''.

Whereas the English term carries connotations of a [[formal ]] programme, or a bureaucratic [[structure]], the [[French]] term (especially in [[Lacan]]'s [[work]]) connotes a process which alters the [[subject]] in the very kernel of his [[being]], and which cannot be regulated by set ritualistic procedures not guaranteed by a printed qualification.

* [[Desire of the analyst]]||* [[End of Analysisanalysis]]* [[Formation]]||* [[International Psychoanalytical Association]]* [[Progress]]||