When Sigmund Freud's essay In "[[The Uncanny]]" appeared in 1919, he had already made a reference [[Freud]] seeks to explain the Unheimliche, in Totem and Taboo (1912-1913a), as well as bringing up the "omnipotence of thought." This shows that the question had interested Freud for some time. Here there are passages on repetition compulsion as well that foreshadow Beyond the Pleasure Principle, which was published a year later (1920g). A forum for intersecting propositions, the essay is also a compendium [[feeling]] of references (Ernst Jentsch, Friedrich von Schiller, Ernst Theodor Amadeus Hoffmann) and yet, Freud does not reference the psychoanalytic literature on related topics, such as Pierre Janet's déjà-vu, or Joseph Capgras's illusion of the doubleuncanniness.
To establish his evasive concept, [[Freud follows two approaches at ]] attibutes the same time: etymology and linguistic variants, and observations or fantasies feeling to a [[repressed]] [[infantile]] [[complex]] that appear in novels. The French, English, and Spanish translations of unheimlich all fail to recapitulate the principal reference to the familiar, or family (heim, or home), which defines and limits the notion of the uncannyhas been revived.
Das Unheimliche is defined as "that particular variety of terror that relates to what has been known for a long time, has been familiar for a long time." We are presented at once with a paradox that Freud does nothing to alleviate since the familiar should not be disquieting. This proposition is at the heart of FreudHoffman's ideas about the original pleasure-ego that coincides with the good and rejects the bad. In "Instincts and their Vicissitudes" (1915c), we find the same opposition between ego/non-ego, just as we do in "NegationThe Sandman" (1925h). Still, it is not clear why the familiar should be threatening and therefore, a second element is needed, namely, the secret, the hidden, which gives rise to describes the notion [[figure]] of hostility and danger. For danger is associated with penetrating what is sealed off, and strangeness—based on an idea Freud borrowed from von Schilling—with the revelation of what should by rights remain hidden because it is Sandman who steals the bearer eyes of transgression[[children]].
To these linguistic and fantasy associations, Freud, in the second part of the essay, introduces a number The [[sense]] of literary examples (many from Hoffmann), centered primarily on the intellectual uncertainty over whether something is living or not (uncanniness arises from Jentsch). There it that which is shown how the repetition compulsion manifests itself through the return of the repressed. This is true even in situations where we expect the new both fearful and with it the return of the dead to lifefrightening.
The theme of [[Freud]]'s short essay on the double, developed by Otto Rank, whom Freud quotes, [[uncanny]] is a source an important landmark in the [[history]] of ambivalence: [[psychoanalytic criticism]], not least in that it moves away from the assurance [[analysis]] of survival [[author]]s and introduces a harbinger thematic [[reading]] of death. Consequently, the Unheimliche is connected with the anxiety associated with the return works of the repressed and with this the concept receives considerable scope: "With animism, magic, sorcery, the omnipotence [[literature]] that provoke a sense of thoughtdread, unintentional repetition, and the castration complex, we have for the most part examined all the factors that transform anxiety into unease or [[horror]] in the uncannyreader."
This In this essay is certainly one of the most fecund, if not one of the most confused, written by [[Freud. It represents an exemplary effort at combining literature ]] explores Hollmann's stories ''The Sandman'' and psychoanalysis, for Freud helps establish his thesis on the basis of the study of works of literature. ''The concepts of anxiety associated with the foreign (René Spitz) and the secret (Piera Aulagnier) have been the subject of research that does not directly extend FreudDevil's work. HoweverElixir'', examination concentrating on those themes that can be related to the [[fear]] of the supernatural (telepathy[[castration]]: severed limbs, for example) and the analysis of literature based on the "anxiety of fiction" (Mijolla-Mellor) are directly related to Freudchildren's study of eye that are magically removed by the uncannysandman to feed his own children.
SOPHIE DE MIJOLLA-MELLORHe interprets [[them]] as an expression of the [[male]] conviction that there is something [[uncanny]] or threatening [[about]] the [[female]] genitals.
See also: DoubleAccording to [[Freud]], the; Fearfeeling of dread arises because the [[uncanny]] (''[[unheimlich]]'') is also familiar or homely (''heimlich'').Source Citation
* FreudHoffmaann's stories evoke something that was once familiar, Sigmund. (1919h). Das Unheimliche. Imago, 5: 297-324; GW, 12: 229-268; The "but which has been made unfamiliar and [[uncanny," SE, 17: 217-256]] by [[repression]].
BibliographyThe ''unheimlich'' is the entrance - the [[maternal]] genitals - to the original [[human]] home or ''Heimat''.
* [[Freud, Sigmund. (1912-1913a). Totem ]]'s argument is underpinned by the philological [[theory]] that certain [[primal]] [[words]] have antithetical [[meanings]] and taboo. SE, 13: 1-161. * Rank, Otto. (1914). The double: A psychoanalytic study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1971by the observation that [[dream]]s often use a single [[image]] to express contraries.
[[Freud]] claims that the seeming antonyms ''heimlich'' and ''unheimlich'' are in fact synonyms adn that they prove that [[primitive]] elements still survive in the [[unconscious]].
The [[encounter]] with the [[uncanny]] thus relates to the rediscovery of something that is very ancient in both [[individual]] and historical [[terms]].
[[Freud]] develops this [[concept]] with references to etymology and [[linguistic]] variants, and observations or [[fantasies]] that appear in novels. The term ''umheimlich'' The [[French]], [[English]], and Spanish translations of unheimlich all fail to recapitulate the principal reference to the familiar, or [[family]] (heim, or home), which defines and limits the [[notion]] of the uncanny. ''Das Unheimliche'' is defined as "that [[particular]] variety of [[terror]] that relates to what has been known for a long [[time]], has been familiar for a long time." We are presented at once with a [[paradox]] that Freud does [[nothing]] to alleviate since the familiar should not be disquieting. This proposition is at the heart of Freud's [[ideas]] about the original [[pleasure]]-ego that coincides with the [[good]] and rejects the bad. In "[[Instincts]] and their Vicissitudes" (1915c), we find the same opposition between ego/non-ego, just as we do in "[[Negation]]" (1925h). Still, it is not clear why the familiar should be threatening and therefore, a second element is needed, namely, the [[secret]], the hidden, which gives rise to the notion of hostility and [[danger]]. For danger is associated with penetrating what is sealed off, and strangeness—based on an [[idea]] Freud borrowed from von Schilling—with the revelation of what should by rights remain hidden because it is the bearer of [[transgression]]. To these linguistic and [[fantasy]] [[associations]], Freud, in the second part of the essay, introduces a [[number]] of [[literary]] examples (many from Hoffmann), centered primarily on the [[intellectual]] uncertainty over whether something is [[living]] or not (from Jentsch). There it is shown how the [[repetition]] [[compulsion]] manifests itself through the [[return]] of the repressed. This is [[true]] even in situations where we expect the new and with it the return of the [[dead]] to [[life]]. The figure of the [[double]] is a source of [[ambivalence]]. the Unheimliche is connected with the [[anxiety]] associated with the [[return of the repressed]] It represents an exemplary effort at combining literature and [[psychoanalysis]]. Freud helps establish his [[thesis]] on the basis of the study of works of literature. ==See Also==* [[Double]]* [[Fear]] ==References==<references/>* [[Freud, Sigmund]]. (1919h). Das Unheimliche. [[Imago]], 5: 297-324; GW, 12: 229-268; The "uncanny," SE, 17: 217-256.* UNCANNY )(386) CD
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Edit]]
[[Category:New]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
