Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Uncanny

1,328 bytes removed, 04:04, 24 June 2006
no edit summary
In "[[The Uncanny]]" [[Freud]] seeks to explain the feeling of uncanniness.
 
[[Freud]] attibutes the feeling to a repressed infantile complex that has been revived.
 
Hoffman's "The Sandman" describes the figure of the Sandman who steals the eyes of children.
 
The sense of uncanniness arises from that which is both fearful and frightening.
[[Freud]]'s short essay on the [[uncanny]] is an important landmark in the [[history]] of [[psychoanalytic criticism]], not least in that it moves away from the analysis of [[author]]s and introduces a thematic reading of works of [[literature]] that provoke a sense of dread, unease or [[horror]] in the reader.
In this essay [[Freud]] explores Hollmann's stories ''The Sandman'' and ''The Devil's Elixir'', concentrating on those themes that can be related to the [[fear]] of [[castration]]: severed limbs, the children's eye that are magically removed by the sandman to feed his own children.
 
He interprets them as an expression of the male conviction that there is something [[uncanny]] or threatening about the female genitals.
 
According to [[Freud]], the feeling of dread arises because the [[uncanny]] (''unheimlich'') is also familiar or homely (''heimlich'').
 
Hoffmaann's stories evoke something that was once familiar, but which has been made unfamiliar and [[uncanny]] by [[repression]].
 
The ''unheimlich'' is the entrance - the maternal genitals - to the original human home or ''Heimat''.
[[Freud]]'s argument is underpinned by the philological theory that certain primal words have antithetical meanings and by the observation that [[dream]]s often use a single [[image]] to express contraries.
 
[[Freud]] claims that the seeming antonyms ''heimlich'' and ''unheimlich'' are in fact synonyms adn that they prove that primitive elements still survive in the [[unconscious]].
 
The encounter with the [[uncanny]] thus relates to the rediscovery of something that is very ancient in both individual and historical terms.
[[Freud]] develops this concept with references to etymology and linguistic variants, and observations or fantasies that appear in novels.
The term ''umheimlich''
The French, English, and Spanish translations of unheimlich all fail to recapitulate the principal reference to the familiar, or family (heim, or home), which defines and limits the notion of the uncanny.
''Das Unheimliche'' is defined as "that particular variety of terror that relates to what has been known for a long time, has been familiar for a long time."
We are presented at once with a paradox that Freud does nothing to alleviate since the familiar should not be disquieting.
This proposition is at the heart of Freud's ideas about the original pleasure-ego that coincides with the good and rejects the bad. In "Instincts and their Vicissitudes" (1915c), we find the same opposition between ego/non-ego, just as we do in "Negation" (1925h).
Still, it is not clear why the familiar should be threatening and therefore, a second element is needed, namely, the secret, the hidden, which gives rise to the notion of hostility and danger.
For danger is associated with penetrating what is sealed off, and strangeness—based on an idea Freud borrowed from von Schilling—with the revelation of what should by rights remain hidden because it is the bearer of transgression.
To these linguistic and fantasy associations, Freud, in the second part of the essay, introduces a number of literary examples (many from Hoffmann), centered primarily on the intellectual uncertainty over whether something is living or not (from Jentsch).
There it is shown how the repetition compulsion manifests itself through the return of the repressed.
This is true even in situations where we expect the new and with it the return of the dead to life.
When Sigmund Freud's essay "The Uncanny" appeared in 1919, he had already made a reference to the Unheimliche, in Totem and Taboo (1912-1913a), as well as bringing up the "omnipotence of thought." This shows that the question had interested Freud for some time. Here there are passages on repetition compulsion as well that foreshadow Beyond the Pleasure Principle, which was published a year later (1920g). A forum for intersecting propositions, the essay is also a compendium of references (Ernst Jentsch, Friedrich von Schiller, Ernst Theodor Amadeus Hoffmann) and yet, Freud does not reference the psychoanalytic literature on related topics, such as Pierre Janet's déjà-vu, or Joseph Capgras's illusion of the double. To establish his evasive concept, Freud follows two approaches at the same time: etymology and linguistic variants, and observations or fantasies that appear in novels. The French, English, and Spanish translations of unheimlich all fail to recapitulate the principal reference to the familiar, or family (heim, or home), which defines and limits the notion of the uncanny. Das Unheimliche is defined as "that particular variety of terror that relates to what has been known for a long time, has been familiar for a long time." We are presented at once with a paradox that Freud does nothing to alleviate since the familiar should not be disquieting. This proposition is at the heart of Freud's ideas about the original pleasure-ego that coincides with the good and rejects the bad. In "Instincts and their Vicissitudes" (1915c), we find the same opposition between ego/non-ego, just as we do in "Negation" (1925h). Still, it is not clear why the familiar should be threatening and therefore, a second element is needed, namely, the secret, the hidden, which gives rise to the notion of hostility and danger. For danger is associated with penetrating what is sealed off, and strangeness—based on an idea Freud borrowed from von Schilling—with the revelation of what should by rights remain hidden because it is the bearer of transgression. To these linguistic and fantasy associations, Freud, in the second part of the essay, introduces a number of literary examples (many from Hoffmann), centered primarily on the intellectual uncertainty over whether something is living or not (from Jentsch). There it is shown how the repetition compulsion manifests itself through the return of the repressed. This is true even in situations where we expect the new and with it the return of the dead to life. The theme figure of the [[double, developed by Otto Rank, whom Freud quotes, ]] is a source of [[ambivalence: the assurance of survival and a harbinger of death. Consequently, the Unheimliche is connected with the anxiety associated with the return of the repressed and with this the concept receives considerable scope: "With animism, magic, sorcery, the omnipotence of thought, unintentional repetition, and the castration complex, we have for the most part examined all the factors that transform anxiety into the uncanny." This essay is certainly one of the most fecund, if not one of the most confused, written by Freud. It represents an exemplary effort at combining literature and psychoanalysis, for Freud helps establish his thesis on the basis of the study of works of literature. The concepts of anxiety associated with the foreign (René Spitz) and the secret (Piera Aulagnier) have been the subject of research that does not directly extend Freud's work. However, examination of the supernatural (telepathy, for example) and the analysis of literature based on the "anxiety of fiction" (Mijolla-Mellor) are directly related to Freud's study of the uncanny. SOPHIE DE MIJOLLA-MELLOR See also: Double, the; Fear.Source Citation  * Freud, Sigmund. (1919h). Das Unheimliche. Imago, 5: 297-324; GW, 12: 229-268; The "uncanny," SE, 17: 217-256]].
Bibliographythe Unheimliche is connected with the anxiety associated with the return of the repressed
* Freud, Sigmund. (1912-1913a). Totem It represents an exemplary effort at combining literature and taboo. SE, 13: 1-161. * Rank, Otto. (1914). The double: A psychoanalytic study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1971psychoanalysis.
Freud helps establish his thesis on the basis of the study of works of literature.
==See Also==
* [[Double]]
* [[Fear]]
==References==<references/>* Freud, Sigmund. (1919h). Das Unheimliche. Imago, 5: 297-324; GW, 12: 229-268; The "uncanny," SE, 17: 217-256.* UNCANNY )(386) CD
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Help]]
[[Category:New]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu