Difference between revisions of "Unconscious"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
(Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit)
 
(66 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Top}}[[inconscient]]]]''
 +
|-
 +
|| [[German]]: ''[[Unbewußte{{Bottom}}
  
unconscious (inconscient) Although the term 'unconscious' had been
+
==Sigmund Freud==
 +
Although the term "[[unconscious]]" had been used by writers prior to [[Freud]], it acquires a completely original [[meaning]] in his [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]], in which it constitutes the single most important [[concept]].  [[Freud]] distinguished between two uses of the term "[[unconscious]]."<ref>{{F}} "[[Works of Sigmund Freud|The Unconscious]]." 1915e. [[SE]] XIV, 161</ref>  The adjective it is very widely used to refer to any element of [[mental]] or [[psychic]] [[activity]] that is not [[present]] within the field of [[consciousness]]; as an ''adjective'', it simply refers to mental or psychic [[processes]] that are not the subject of, that occur in the [[absence]] of, [[consciousness|conscious awareness, thought, attention, perception or control]].  As a ''noun'', the ''noun-[[form]]'' designates one of the ''[[psychical]] systems'' described by [[Freud]] in his [[topology|topographical model]] of the [[psyche]], his first [[theory]] of [[psyche|mental]] [[structure]].
  
    used by writers prior to Freud, it acquires a completely original meaning in his
+
[[Image:Freudpsyche.gif|thumb|300px|right|[[Unconscious|Freud's Model of the Unconscious]]]]
 +
==="Topological Model"===
 +
The "'''[[topographical model]]'''" [[divides]] the [[mind]] or [[psyche]] into [[three]] [[separate]] component parts -- or "[[scene|psychical localities]]":
 +
* the '''[[conscious]]''' ('''[[conscious|Cs]]'''),
 +
* the '''[[preconscious]]''' ('''[[preconscious|Pcs]]''') and
 +
* the [[unconscious]] ('''[[unconscious|Ucs]]''')
  
work, in which it constitutes the single most important concept.
+
The [[unconscious|unconscious system]] is not merely that which is ''[[outside]]'' the field of [[consciousness]] at a given [[time]], but that which has been radically [[separation|separated]] from [[consciousness]] by [[repression]] and thus cannot enter the [[conscious|conscious-preconscious system]] without [[distortion]].
  
      Freud distinguished between two uses of the term 'unconscious' (Freud,
+
==="Structural Model"===
 +
[[Freud]]'s second [[model]] of the [[mind]] or [[psyche]] -- the "'''[[Structural theory]]'''" -- consisted of three "'''[[agencies]]'''":
 +
* the '''[[id]]''',
 +
* the '''[[ego]]''', and
 +
* the '''[[superego]]'''
  
  19l5e). As an adjective, it simply refers to mental processes that are not the
+
In this model, no one '''[[agency]]''' is identical to the [[unconscious]], since even the [[ego]] and the [[superego]] have [[unconscious]] parts.
  
subject of conscious attention at a given moment. As a noun (the unconscious;
+
==Jacques Lacan==
 +
===Early Work===
 +
[[Lacan]], before 1950, uses the term "[[unconscious]]" principally in its ''adjectival form'', making his early [[work]] seem particularly strange to those who are more familiar with [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|writings]].
  
  das Unbewuflte), it designates      one of the psychical systems which Freud
+
===Later Work===
 +
In the 1950s, however, as [[Lacan]] begins his "[[return to Freud]]," the term appears more frequently as a ''noun'', and [[Lacan]] increasingly emphasizes the originality of [[Freud]]'s concept of the [[unconscious]], stressing that it is not merely the opposite of [[consciousness]].
  
  described in his first theory of mental structure (the 'topographical model').
+
<blockquote>"A large [[number]] of psychical effects that are quite legitimately designated as unconscious, in the [[sense]] of excluding the characteristics of consciousness, are nonetheless without any relation whatever to the unconscious in the [[Freudian]] sense."<ref>{{E}} p.163</ref></blockquote>
  
According to this theory, the mind is divided into three systems or 'psychical
+
He also insists that the [[unconscious]] cannot simply be equated with "[[unconscious|that which is repressed]]."
  
localities'; the conscious (Cs), the preconscious (Pcs) and the unconscious
+
===Biological Reductionism===
 +
[[Lacan]] argues that the concept of the [[unconscious]] was badly misunderstood by most of [[Freud]]'s followers, who reduced it to [[being]] "merely the seat of the [[instincts]]."<ref>{{E}} p. 147</ref>  Against this [[biology|biologistic]] mode of [[thought]], [[Lacan]] argues that "the unconscious is neither primordial nor [[instinctual]];"<ref>{{E}} p. 170</ref> it is primarily [[linguistic]].
  
(Ucs). The unconscious system is not merely that which is outside the field of
+
===Language===
 +
This is summed up in [[Lacan]]'s famous [[formula]], "[[unconscious|the unconscious is structured like a language]]."<ref>{{S3}} p.167</ref>  [[Lacan]]'s analysis of the [[unconscious]] in [[terms]] of [[synchronic]] [[structure]] is supplemented by his [[idea]] of the [[unconscious]] opening and closing in a [[time|temporal pulsation]].<ref>{{S11}} p. 143, 204</ref>
  
  consciousness at a given time, but that which has been radically separated from
+
===Criticism===
 +
[[Lacan]] himself qualifies his [[linguistic]] approach by arguing that the [[reason]] why the [[unconscious]] is [[structure]]d like a [[language]] is that "we only grasp the unconscious finally when it is explicated, in that part of it which is articulated by passing into [[words]]."<ref>{{S7}} p. 32</ref>
  
  consciousness by repression and thus cannot enter the conscious-preconscious
+
===Discourse===
 +
[[Lacan]] also describes the [[unconscious]] as a [[discourse]]: "[[unconscious|The unconscious is the discourse of the Other]]."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 16</ref>  This enigmatic formula, which has become one of [[Lacan]]'s most famous dictums, can be [[understood]] in many ways.  Perhaps the most important meaning is that "one should see in the unconscious the effects of speech on the subject."<ref>{{S11}} p. 126</ref>  More precisely, the [[unconscious]] is the effects of the [[signifier]] on the [[subject]], in that the [[signifier]] is what is [[repressed]] and what returns in the [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] ([[symptom]]s, [[jokes]], [[parapraxes]], [[dream]]s, etc.).
  
  system without distortion.
+
===Symbolic===
 +
All the references to [[language]], [[speech]], [[discourse]] and [[signifier]]s clearly locate the [[unconscious]] in the [[order]] of the [[symbolic]].  
 +
<blockquote>Indeed, "the unconscious is [[structured]] as a function of [[the symbolic]]."<ref>{{S7}} p. 12</ref></blockquote>
  
      In Freud's second theory of mental structure (the 'structural theory'), the
+
The [[unconscious]] is the determination of the [[subject]] by the [[symbolic order]].
  
  omd is divided into the three "agencies' of ego, superego and id. In this model,
+
===Exteriority===
 +
The [[unconscious]] is not interior: on the contrary, since [[speech]] and [[language]] are [[intersubjective]] phenomena, the [[unconscious]] is "transindividual."<ref>{{E}} p.49</ref> The [[unconscious]] is, so to [[speak]], "outside."
  
  no one agency is identical to the unconscious, since even the ego and the
+
<blockquote>"This exteriority of the symbolic in relation to man is the very [[notion]] of the unconscious."<ref>{{Ec}} p.469</ref></blockquote>
  
superego have unconscious parts.
+
If the [[unconscious]] seems interior, this is an effect of the [[imaginary]], which blocks the [[relationship]] between the [[subject]] and the [[Other]] and which [[invert]]s the [[message]] of the [[Other]].
  
      Lacan, before 1950, uses the term 'unconscious' principally in its adjectival
+
===Formations===
 +
Although the [[unconscious]] is especially [[visible]] in the [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]], "the unconscious leaves none of our actions outside its field."<ref>{{E}} p. 163</ref>  The [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]], which are those of [[repetition]] and [[desire]], are as ubiquitous as [[structure]] itself.  The [[unconscious]] is irreducible, so the aim of [[analysis]] cannot be to make [[conscious]] the [[unconscious]].  In addition to the various [[linguistic]] [[metaphor]]s which [[Lacan]] draws on to conceptualize the [[unconscious]] ([[discourse]], [[language]], [[speech]]), he also conceives of the [[unconscious]] in other terms.
  
form, making his early work seem particularly strange to those who are more
+
===Memory===
 +
The [[unconscious]] is also a kind of [[memory]], in the sense of a [[symbolic]] [[history]] of the [[signifier]]s that have determined the [[subject]] in the course of his [[life]].
  
familiar with Freud's writings. In the 1950s, however, as Lacan begins his
+
<blockquote>"What we teach the subject to recognize as his unconscious is his history."<ref>{{E}} p.52</ref></blockquote>
  
.return to Freud', the term appears more frequently            as a noun, and Lacan
+
===Knowledge===
 +
Since it is an articulation of [[signifier]]s in a [[signifying chain]], the [[unconscious]] is a kind of [[knowledge]] ([[symbolic]] [[knowledge]], or ''[[savoir]]'').  More precisely, it is an "[[unconscious|unknown knowledge]]."
  
increasingly emphasises the originality of Freud's concept of the unconscious,
+
==See Also==
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [[Biology]]
 +
* [[Consciousness]]
 +
* [[Discourse]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Desire]]
 +
* [[Drive]]
 +
* [[Instinct]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Knowledge]]
 +
* [[Language]]
 +
* [[Linguistics]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Memory]]
 +
* [[Repetition]]
 +
* [[Signifier]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Speech]]
 +
* [[Structure]]
 +
* [[Symbolic]]
  
stressing that it is not merely the opposite of consciousness; 'a large number of
+
{{Also}}
  
psychical effects that are quite legitimately designated as unconscious, in the
+
==References==
 
+
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
    sense of excluding the characteristics of consciousness, are nonetheless with-
+
<references/>
 
+
</div>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
out any relation whatever to the unconscious in the Freudian sense' (E, 163).
 
 
 
He also insists that the unconscious cannot simply be equated with 'that which
 
 
 
is repressed'.
 
 
 
      Lacan argues that the concept of the unconscious was badly misunderstood
 
 
 
by most of Freud's followers, who reduced it to being 'merely the seat of the
 
 
 
instincts' (E, 147). Against this biologistic mode of thought, Lacan argues that
 
 
 
'the unconscious is neither primordial nor instinctual' (E, 170); it is primarily
 
 
 
linguistic. This is summed up in Lacan's famous formula, 'the unconscious is
 
 
 
structured like      a language' (S3, 167;        see LANGUAGE, STRUCTURE). Lacan's
 
 
 
analysis of the unconscious in terms of synchronic structure is supplemented
 
 
 
by his idea of the unconscious opening and closing in a temporal pulsation
 
 
 
(S11, 143, 204).
 
 
 
      Some psychoanalysts have objected to Lacan's linguistic approach to the
 
 
 
unconscious on the grounds that it is overly restrictive, and on the grounds that
 
 
 
Freud himself excluded word-presentations from the unconscious (S7, 44; for
 
 
 
Lacan's refutation of these objections, see THING). Lacan himself qualifies his
 
 
 
linguistic approach by arguing that the reason why the unconscious is struc-
 
 
 
tured like a language is that 'we only grasp the unconscious finally when it is
 
 
 
explicated, in that part of it which is articulated by passing into words' (S7,
 
 
 
32).
 
 
 
      Lacan also describes the unconscious as a discourse: 'The unconscious is the
 
 
 
discourse of the Other' (Ec, 16; see OTHER). This enigmatic formula, which has
 
  
become one of Lacan's most famous dictums, can be understood in many
+
{{OK}}
 +
[[Category:Dictionary]]
  
  ways. Perhaps the most important meaning is that 'one should          see in the
 
 
unconscious the effects of speech          on the subject' (Sll, 126). More pre-
 
 
cisely, the unconscious is the effects of the SIGNIFIER on the subject, in that
 
 
the signifier is what is repressed and what returns in the formations of the
 
 
unconscious (symptoms, jokes, parapraxes, dreams, etc.).
 
 
      All the references to language, speech, discourse and signifiers clearly locate
 
 
the unconscious in the order of the SYMBOLIc. Indeed, 'the unconscious is
 
 
structured as a function of the symbolic' (S7, 12). The unconscious is the
 
 
determination of the subject by the symbolic order.
 
 
      The unconscious is not interior: on the contrary, since speech and language
 
 
  are intersubjective phenomena, the unconscious is 'transindividual' (E, 49);
 
 
  the unconscious is, so to speak, 'outside'. 'This exteriority of the symbolic in
 
 
  relation to  man is the very notion of the unconscious' (Ec, 469). If the
 
 
unconscious seems interior, this is an effect of the imaginary, which blocks
 
 
the relationship between the subject and the Other and which inverts the
 
 
message of the Other.
 
 
      Although the unconscious is especially visible in the formations of the
 
 
unconscious, 'the unconscious leaves none of our actions outside its field'
 
 
(E, 163). The laws of the unconscious, which are those of repetition and desire,
 
 
  are as ubiquitous as structure itself. The unconscious is irreducible, so the aim
 
 
  of analysis cannot be to make conscious the unconscious.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      In addition to the various linguistic metaphors which Lacan draws on to
 
 
conceptualise the unconscious (discourse, language, speech), he also conceives
 
 
of the unconscious in other terms.
 
 
 
 
  g    MEMORY The unconscious is also a kind of memory, in the sense of a
 
 
symbolic history of the signifiers that have determined the subject in the course
 
 
of his life; 'what we teach the subject to recognize as his unconscious is his
 
 
history' (E, p. 52).
 
 
  e    KNOWLEDGE Since it is an articulation of signifiers in a signifying chain,
 
 
  the unconscious is a kind of knowledge (symbolic knowledge, or savoir). More
 
 
precisely, it is an 'unknown knowledge'.
 
 
 
 
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
  
[[Category:Lacan]]
+
__NOTOC__
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 

Latest revision as of 02:58, 21 May 2019

French: [[inconscient]]
German: Unbewußte

Sigmund Freud

Although the term "unconscious" had been used by writers prior to Freud, it acquires a completely original meaning in his work, in which it constitutes the single most important concept. Freud distinguished between two uses of the term "unconscious."[1] The adjective it is very widely used to refer to any element of mental or psychic activity that is not present within the field of consciousness; as an adjective, it simply refers to mental or psychic processes that are not the subject of, that occur in the absence of, conscious awareness, thought, attention, perception or control. As a noun, the noun-form designates one of the psychical systems described by Freud in his topographical model of the psyche, his first theory of mental structure.

Error creating thumbnail: File missing

"Topological Model"

The "topographical model" divides the mind or psyche into three separate component parts -- or "psychical localities":

The unconscious system is not merely that which is outside the field of consciousness at a given time, but that which has been radically separated from consciousness by repression and thus cannot enter the conscious-preconscious system without distortion.

"Structural Model"

Freud's second model of the mind or psyche -- the "Structural theory" -- consisted of three "agencies":

In this model, no one agency is identical to the unconscious, since even the ego and the superego have unconscious parts.

Jacques Lacan

Early Work

Lacan, before 1950, uses the term "unconscious" principally in its adjectival form, making his early work seem particularly strange to those who are more familiar with Freud's writings.

Later Work

In the 1950s, however, as Lacan begins his "return to Freud," the term appears more frequently as a noun, and Lacan increasingly emphasizes the originality of Freud's concept of the unconscious, stressing that it is not merely the opposite of consciousness.

"A large number of psychical effects that are quite legitimately designated as unconscious, in the sense of excluding the characteristics of consciousness, are nonetheless without any relation whatever to the unconscious in the Freudian sense."[2]

He also insists that the unconscious cannot simply be equated with "that which is repressed."

Biological Reductionism

Lacan argues that the concept of the unconscious was badly misunderstood by most of Freud's followers, who reduced it to being "merely the seat of the instincts."[3] Against this biologistic mode of thought, Lacan argues that "the unconscious is neither primordial nor instinctual;"[4] it is primarily linguistic.

Language

This is summed up in Lacan's famous formula, "the unconscious is structured like a language."[5] Lacan's analysis of the unconscious in terms of synchronic structure is supplemented by his idea of the unconscious opening and closing in a temporal pulsation.[6]

Criticism

Lacan himself qualifies his linguistic approach by arguing that the reason why the unconscious is structured like a language is that "we only grasp the unconscious finally when it is explicated, in that part of it which is articulated by passing into words."[7]

Discourse

Lacan also describes the unconscious as a discourse: "The unconscious is the discourse of the Other."[8] This enigmatic formula, which has become one of Lacan's most famous dictums, can be understood in many ways. Perhaps the most important meaning is that "one should see in the unconscious the effects of speech on the subject."[9] More precisely, the unconscious is the effects of the signifier on the subject, in that the signifier is what is repressed and what returns in the formations of the unconscious (symptoms, jokes, parapraxes, dreams, etc.).

Symbolic

All the references to language, speech, discourse and signifiers clearly locate the unconscious in the order of the symbolic.

Indeed, "the unconscious is structured as a function of the symbolic."[10]

The unconscious is the determination of the subject by the symbolic order.

Exteriority

The unconscious is not interior: on the contrary, since speech and language are intersubjective phenomena, the unconscious is "transindividual."[11] The unconscious is, so to speak, "outside."

"This exteriority of the symbolic in relation to man is the very notion of the unconscious."[12]

If the unconscious seems interior, this is an effect of the imaginary, which blocks the relationship between the subject and the Other and which inverts the message of the Other.

Formations

Although the unconscious is especially visible in the formations of the unconscious, "the unconscious leaves none of our actions outside its field."[13] The laws of the unconscious, which are those of repetition and desire, are as ubiquitous as structure itself. The unconscious is irreducible, so the aim of analysis cannot be to make conscious the unconscious. In addition to the various linguistic metaphors which Lacan draws on to conceptualize the unconscious (discourse, language, speech), he also conceives of the unconscious in other terms.

Memory

The unconscious is also a kind of memory, in the sense of a symbolic history of the signifiers that have determined the subject in the course of his life.

"What we teach the subject to recognize as his unconscious is his history."[14]

Knowledge

Since it is an articulation of signifiers in a signifying chain, the unconscious is a kind of knowledge (symbolic knowledge, or savoir). More precisely, it is an "unknown knowledge."

See Also

References

  1. Freud, Sigmund. "The Unconscious." 1915e. SE XIV, 161
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.163
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 147
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 170
  5. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.167
  6. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 143, 204
  7. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 32
  8. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 16
  9. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 126
  10. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 12
  11. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.49
  12. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.469
  13. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 163
  14. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.52