Changes
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
[http://aejcpp.free.fr/lacan/1955-02-03.htm link]
28
1955 (40 pp.)-VARIANTES DE LA CURE TYPE (VARIATIONS OF THE TYPICAL THERAPY)
[[Lacan]] wrote this article for the Encylopedie Medico-Chirurgicale, at H. Ey's [[request]]. He denounced the [[notion]] of typical [[therapy]] defended by the S.P.P. In 1960 the article was removed from the encylopedia, under the pressure of "a certain majority defined by our critique," he said in [[Ecrits]]. Indeed, using an investigation conducted by Glover in England (1934), he violently de�nounced those who were "screens of nullity," incapable of spreading the [[truth]] of [[psychoanalysis]] [[outside]] the [[official]] circles because it was misunderstood [[inside]] the official societies. Against "their [[practical]] formalism," he claimed Ferenczi and his "[[psychoanalytic]] elasticity" as his [[authority]], and he ulti�mately argued for "a [[theoretical]] [[formalization]]" that alone could be the guar�antor of the "[[ethical]] rigor" that separates psychoanalysis from [[psychotherapy]]. For the first [[time]], he expressed a certain distrust before any innovation "mo�tivated by recovery."
Seminaire /I (27), with the [[Schema]] L .• required that, for the [[psychoanalyst]], "the ego be [[absent]]." Here, it is enough that "the mirages of his [[narcissism]] have become [[transparent]] to him," so as to make him "permeable to the [[speech]] of the [[other]]." Everything takes [[place]] in [[language]], including "the [[drives]] discovered in [[analysis]] according to the vicissitudes of [[logical]] substitu�tions, in their source, their direction, their [[object]]." But what is speech? Since Le My the du nevrose (22) reference to [[Heidegger]] was constant. Lacan kept referring to him, in spite of Hyppolite who did not recognize in the philoso�pher "the [[symbolic]] abolition" and the "inaugural assertion" that Lacan saw in him linking [[the symbolic]] [[order]] and the [[death]] [[instinct]] (27). There is already an indication of the famous expression, "there is no [[metalanguage]]," in the
·h·
1158 DOS S I E R
following lIeideggerian tones: "No [[concept]] gives us the [[meaning]] of speech, not even the concept of the concept, for speech is not the meaning of meaning, but it gives its support to meaning in the [[symbol]] which it embodies through its act." Then, at the origin, is there language as [[system]] or is there speech? Besides, the end of the analysis, defined as the [[subjectivation]] of one own's death, refers back to the [[philosopher]]'s "[[being]]-for-death." What is the psy�choanalyst's [[knowledge]]? ... A learned [[ignorance]]. What [[about]] his tech�nique? ... It is "the only one that is appropriate to my [[personality]]" -[[others]] may prefer to make other arrangements concerning their [[patients]] ...
