Difference between revisions of "Vladimir Propp"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Vladimir Yakovlevich Propp'''  ([[Saint Petersburg|St Petersburg]], [[April 29]], [[1895]] &ndash; [[Saint Petersburg|Leningrad]] [[August 22]], [[1970]]) was a [[Russia]]n [[structuralist]] scholar who analysed the basic plot components of Russian [[folk tale]]s to identify their simplest irreducible narrative elements. His ''[[Morphology of the Folk Tale]]'' was  published in Russian in 1928; although it represented a breakthrough in both [[folkloristics]] and [[morphology (folkloristics)|morphology]] and influenced [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] and [[Roland Barthes]], it was generally unnoticed in the West until it was translated in the 1950s.  
+
'''Vladimir Yakovlevich Propp'''  ([[Saint Petersburg|St Petersburg]], [[April 29]], [[1895]] &ndash; [[Saint Petersburg|Leningrad]] [[August 22]], [[1970]]) was a [[Russia]]n [[structuralist]] scholar who analysed the basic plot components of Russian [[folk tale]]s to [[identify]] their simplest irreducible [[narrative]] elements. His ''[[Morphology of the Folk Tale]]'' was  published in Russian in 1928; although it represented a breakthrough in both [[folkloristics]] and [[morphology (folkloristics)|morphology]] and influenced [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] and [[Roland Barthes]], it was generally unnoticed in the West until it was translated in the 1950s.  
  
 
==Morphology==
 
==Morphology==
Propp extended the Russian [[Formalist]] approach to [[narratology|the study of narrative structure]]. In the Formalist approach, sentence structures in narrative had been broken down into analysable elements, or "morphemes". Propp used this method by analogy to analyse folk tales. Ignoring narrative tone or mood, or extraneous decorative detail, and breaking down a large number of Russian folk tales into their smallest narrative units, which he called functions, and some of his modern followers like to call "narratemes", Propp was able to arrive at a typology of narrative structures. By analysing types of characters and kinds of action in a hundred tales, Propp was able to arrive at the conclusion that there were just thirty-one generic "narratemes" in the traditional Russian folk tale. While not all are present in every tale, he found that all the tales he analysed displayed the functions in unvarying sequence. He claimed that “[F]ive categories of elements define not only the construction of a tale, but the tale as a whole.”:
+
Propp extended the Russian [[Formalist]] approach to [[narratology|the study of narrative structure]]. In the Formalist approach, [[sentence]] [[structures]] in narrative had been broken down into analysable elements, or "morphemes". Propp used this method by analogy to [[analyse]] folk tales. Ignoring narrative tone or mood, or extraneous decorative detail, and breaking down a large [[number]] of Russian folk tales into their smallest narrative units, which he called functions, and some of his modern followers like to call "narratemes", Propp was able to arrive at a typology of narrative structures. By analysing types of characters and kinds of [[action]] in a hundred tales, Propp was able to arrive at the conclusion that there were just thirty-one generic "narratemes" in the traditional Russian folk tale. While not all are [[present]] in every tale, he found that all the tales he analysed displayed the functions in unvarying sequence. He claimed that “[F]ive [[categories]] of elements define not only the [[construction]] of a tale, but the tale as a [[whole]].”:
 
# Functions of [[dramatis personae]] (see below)
 
# Functions of [[dramatis personae]] (see below)
# Conjuctive elements ([[Deus ex machina|ex machina]], announcement of misfortune, chance disclosure – mother calls hero loudly, etc.)
+
# Conjuctive elements ([[Deus ex machina|ex machina]], announcement of misfortune, [[chance]] disclosure – [[mother]] calls hero loudly, etc.)
 
# Motivations (reasons and aims of personages)
 
# Motivations (reasons and aims of personages)
# Forms of appearance of dramatis personae (the flying arrival of [[dragon]], chance meeting with donor)
+
# Forms of [[appearance]] of dramatis personae (the flying arrival of [[dragon]], chance meeting with donor)
 
# Attributive elements or accessories ([[witch]]’s hut or her clay leg)
 
# Attributive elements or accessories ([[witch]]’s hut or her clay leg)
  
“Morphologically, a tale (сказка) may be termed any development proceeding from villainy (A) or a lack (a), through intermediary functions to marriage, or to other functions employed as a [[dénouement]]. Terminal functions are at times a reward, a gain or in general the liquidation of misfortune, en escape from pursuit, etc. This type of development is termed by us a move (ход).  Each new act of villainy, each new lack creates a new move. A tale can have several moves, and when analyzing a tale one must first determine the number of moves of which it consists. One move may directly follow another but they can also interweave.”
+
“Morphologically, a tale (сказка) may be termed any [[development]] proceeding from villainy (A) or a [[lack]] (a), through intermediary functions to [[marriage]], or to [[other]] functions employed as a [[dénouement]]. Terminal functions are at [[times]] a reward, a gain or in general the liquidation of misfortune, en escape from pursuit, etc. This type of development is termed by us a move (ход).  Each new act of villainy, each new lack creates a new move. A tale can have several moves, and when analyzing a tale one must first determine the number of moves of which it consists. One move may directly follow [[another]] but they can also interweave.”
  
The summation of a typical Proppian analysis consists of an alphanumeric string representing the functions in the tale, for example:  
+
The summation of a typical Proppian [[analysis]] consists of an alphanumeric string representing the functions in the tale, for example:  
 
:αa<sup>5</sup>D<sup>1</sup>E<sup>1</sup>MF<sup>1</sup>Ta<sup>5</sup>BKNToQW*
 
:αa<sup>5</sup>D<sup>1</sup>E<sup>1</sup>MF<sup>1</sup>Ta<sup>5</sup>BKNToQW*
  
As well as finding the 31 narrative functions of Propp's theory he also discovered that there are ''only'' 8 broad [[Fictional character|character]] types in the 100 tales he analysed:
+
As well as finding the 31 narrative functions of Propp's [[theory]] he also discovered that there are ''only'' 8 broad [[Fictional character|character]] types in the 100 tales he analysed:
  
 
# The villain (struggles against the hero)  
 
# The villain (struggles against the hero)  
# The [[Fairy godmother|donor]] (prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical object)  
+
# The [[Fairy godmother|donor]] (prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical [[object]])  
 
# The (magical) helper (helps the hero in the quest)  
 
# The (magical) helper (helps the hero in the quest)  
# The princess (person the hero marries, often sought for during the narrative)
+
# The princess (person the hero [[marries]], often sought for during the narrative)
# Her father  
+
# Her [[father]]
# The dispatcher (character who makes the lack known and sends the hero off)
+
# The dispatcher ([[character]] who makes the lack known and sends the hero off)
# The hero or victim/ seeker hero, reacts to the donor, weds the princess
+
# The hero or [[victim]]/ seeker hero, reacts to the donor, weds the princess
 
# [[False hero]]/[[anti-hero]]/usurper &mdash; (takes credit for the hero’s actions/ tries to marry the princess)
 
# [[False hero]]/[[anti-hero]]/usurper &mdash; (takes credit for the hero’s actions/ tries to marry the princess)
  
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
Propp's approach has been criticized for entirely removing all verbal considerations from the analysis, despite the folktale's usual form being oral, and also all considerations of tone, mood, character, and, indeed, anything that differentiates one fairy tale from another. Among the more prominent critics of Propp is the famous French Structuralist Claude Levi-Strauss, who used Propp's monograph on the morphology of the Folktale to demonstrate the shortcomings of the Formalist approach, and the superiority of the Structuralist approach. (see Levi-Strauss, Claude. "Structure and Form: Reflection on a Work by Vladimir Propp")
+
Propp's approach has been criticized for entirely removing all [[verbal]] considerations from the analysis, despite the folktale's usual [[form]] [[being]] [[oral]], and also all considerations of tone, mood, character, and, indeed, anything that differentiates one fairy tale from another. Among the more prominent critics of Propp is the famous [[French]] Structuralist Claude Levi-[[Strauss]], who used Propp's monograph on the morphology of the Folktale to demonstrate the shortcomings of the Formalist approach, and the superiority of the Structuralist approach. (see [[Levi-Strauss]], Claude. "[[Structure]] and Form: [[Reflection]] on a [[Work]] by Vladimir Propp")
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* [http://www.brown.edu/Courses/FR0133/Fairytale_Generator/home.html The Fairy Tale Generator]: generate your own.
 
* [http://www.brown.edu/Courses/FR0133/Fairytale_Generator/home.html The Fairy Tale Generator]: generate your own.
 
* [http://www.brown.edu/Courses/FR0133/Fairytale_Generator/propp.html Criticism]
 
* [http://www.brown.edu/Courses/FR0133/Fairytale_Generator/propp.html Criticism]
* [http://www.uni-essen.de/literaturwissenschaft-aktiv/Vorlesungen/epik/propp.htm Assessment of Propp] (in German)
+
* [http://www.uni-essen.de/literaturwissenschaft-aktiv/Vorlesungen/epik/propp.htm Assessment of Propp] (in [[German]])
 
* [http://www.stonedragonpress.com/wicca_201/vladimir_propp/oral_tradition_00_a.html A Fairytale Outline Generator]: based on Propp's Morphology
 
* [http://www.stonedragonpress.com/wicca_201/vladimir_propp/oral_tradition_00_a.html A Fairytale Outline Generator]: based on Propp's Morphology
 
*'''''(in Russian)''''' [http://www.lib.ru/CULTURE/PROPP/skazki.txt The Historical Roots of the Wonder Tale ] Propp's examination of the origin of specific folktale motifs in customs and beliefs, initiation rites.
 
*'''''(in Russian)''''' [http://www.lib.ru/CULTURE/PROPP/skazki.txt The Historical Roots of the Wonder Tale ] Propp's examination of the origin of specific folktale motifs in customs and beliefs, initiation rites.

Latest revision as of 20:53, 23 May 2019

Vladimir Yakovlevich Propp (St Petersburg, April 29, 1895Leningrad August 22, 1970) was a Russian structuralist scholar who analysed the basic plot components of Russian folk tales to identify their simplest irreducible narrative elements. His Morphology of the Folk Tale was published in Russian in 1928; although it represented a breakthrough in both folkloristics and morphology and influenced Claude Lévi-Strauss and Roland Barthes, it was generally unnoticed in the West until it was translated in the 1950s.

Morphology

Propp extended the Russian Formalist approach to the study of narrative structure. In the Formalist approach, sentence structures in narrative had been broken down into analysable elements, or "morphemes". Propp used this method by analogy to analyse folk tales. Ignoring narrative tone or mood, or extraneous decorative detail, and breaking down a large number of Russian folk tales into their smallest narrative units, which he called functions, and some of his modern followers like to call "narratemes", Propp was able to arrive at a typology of narrative structures. By analysing types of characters and kinds of action in a hundred tales, Propp was able to arrive at the conclusion that there were just thirty-one generic "narratemes" in the traditional Russian folk tale. While not all are present in every tale, he found that all the tales he analysed displayed the functions in unvarying sequence. He claimed that “[F]ive categories of elements define not only the construction of a tale, but the tale as a whole.”:

  1. Functions of dramatis personae (see below)
  2. Conjuctive elements (ex machina, announcement of misfortune, chance disclosure – mother calls hero loudly, etc.)
  3. Motivations (reasons and aims of personages)
  4. Forms of appearance of dramatis personae (the flying arrival of dragon, chance meeting with donor)
  5. Attributive elements or accessories (witch’s hut or her clay leg)

“Morphologically, a tale (сказка) may be termed any development proceeding from villainy (A) or a lack (a), through intermediary functions to marriage, or to other functions employed as a dénouement. Terminal functions are at times a reward, a gain or in general the liquidation of misfortune, en escape from pursuit, etc. This type of development is termed by us a move (ход). Each new act of villainy, each new lack creates a new move. A tale can have several moves, and when analyzing a tale one must first determine the number of moves of which it consists. One move may directly follow another but they can also interweave.”

The summation of a typical Proppian analysis consists of an alphanumeric string representing the functions in the tale, for example:

αa5D1E1MF1Ta5BKNToQW*

As well as finding the 31 narrative functions of Propp's theory he also discovered that there are only 8 broad character types in the 100 tales he analysed:

  1. The villain (struggles against the hero)
  2. The donor (prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical object)
  3. The (magical) helper (helps the hero in the quest)
  4. The princess (person the hero marries, often sought for during the narrative)
  5. Her father
  6. The dispatcher (character who makes the lack known and sends the hero off)
  7. The hero or victim/ seeker hero, reacts to the donor, weds the princess
  8. False hero/anti-hero/usurper — (takes credit for the hero’s actions/ tries to marry the princess)

Criticism

Propp's approach has been criticized for entirely removing all verbal considerations from the analysis, despite the folktale's usual form being oral, and also all considerations of tone, mood, character, and, indeed, anything that differentiates one fairy tale from another. Among the more prominent critics of Propp is the famous French Structuralist Claude Levi-Strauss, who used Propp's monograph on the morphology of the Folktale to demonstrate the shortcomings of the Formalist approach, and the superiority of the Structuralist approach. (see Levi-Strauss, Claude. "Structure and Form: Reflection on a Work by Vladimir Propp")

External links

cs:Vladimir Jakovlevič Propp de:Wladimir Jakowlewitsch Propp es:Vladimir Propp fr:Vladimir Propp it:Vladimir Propp lv:Vladimirs Props nl:Vladimir Propp no:Vladimir Propp pt:Vladimir Propp ru:Пропп, Владимир Яковлевич sk:Vladimir Jakovlevič Propp fi:Vladimir Propp