Iraq - The Borrowed Kettle

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle - Slavoj Žižek
Slavoj Žižek
Author: Slavoj Zizek
File type: pdf
Series: Wo es war
Publisher: Verso
Year: 2004
Language: English
ISBN: 9781844670015
Time Added: Wed Feb 13 2019 14:02:30 GMT+0300 (MSK)
Author: Slavoj Zizek
File type: pdf
Size: 7 mb
City: London and New York
Edition: 1st
Pages: 188
Id: 1498986
Time Modified: Wed Feb 13 2019 14:02:30 GMT+0300 (MSK)
Extension: pdf
Bibtex: "Slavoj Žižek",
"Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle"
If you want to understand why the Bush administration invaded Iraq, read Freud's Interpretation of Dreams, not the National Security Strategy of the United States. Žižek analyzes the bizarre logic used to justify the attack on Iraq. In order to render the strange logic of dreams, Freud quoted the old joke about the borrowed kettle: (1) I never borrowed a kettle from you, (2) I returned it to you unbroken, (3) the kettle was already broken when I got it from you. Such an enumeration of inconsistent arguments, of course, confirms exactly what it attempts to deny—that I returned a broken kettle to you. That same inconsistency, Žižek argues, characterized the justification of the attack on Iraq: A link between Saddam's regime and al-Qaeda was transformed into the threat posed by the regime to the region, which was then further transformed into the threat posed to everyone (but the US and Britain especially) by weapons of mass destruction. When no significant weapons were found, we were treated to the same bizarre logic: OK, the two labs we found don't really prove anything, but even if there are no WMD in Iraq, there are other good reasons to topple a tyrant like Saddam ... "Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle" – which can be considered as a sequel to Žižek's acclaimed post-9/11 "Welcome to the Desert of the Real" – analyzes the background that such inconsistent argumentation conceals and, simultaneously, cannot help but highlight: what were the actual ideological and political stakes of the attack on Iraq? In classic Žižekian style, it spares nothing and nobody, neither pathetically impotent pacifism nor hypocritical sympathy with the suffering of the Iraqi people.