Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Helplessness

5,328 bytes added, 14:54, 4 August 2006
no edit summary

The state of [[helplessness]] is linked to the [[infant]]'s initial [[power]]lessness in the face of its [[need]]s.

This causes distress, as the protective shield is overwhelmed; only the intervention of another person can relieve this [[suffering]].

The neurophysiological model of [[Sigmund Freud]]'s "Project for a Scientific Psychology" (1950c [1895]) posits the [[baby]]'s original [[helplessness]] as the prototype of all [[trauma]]tic situations.

[[Helplessness]] and [[satisfaction]] [[structure]] the two modes of mental functioning.

In the primary mode, the [[desire]]d [[object]] and [[desire]]d [[satisfaction]] are hallucinated immediately through re[[cathexis]] of the [[memory]] traces left by the real experience.

In the secondary mode, a lasting discharge forms the basis for the relationship to the real object, lost and rediscovered thanks to "indications of reality," and invested with the meaning "mutual understanding."

[[Helplessness]] and the theory of [[anxiety]] are closely linked.

The [[helpless]] baby, powerless to fulfill its needs and without any adequate means of discharging internal excitation, experiences "automatic anxiety."

Anticipation of [[helplessness]] triggers "signal anxiety," the ego's appeal to the ego (1926d [1925]).

In a state of [[helplessness]] owing to its [[prematurity]], the preverbal [[human]] [[infant]] cries, experiences and recognizes its [[power]]lessness, and urgently alerts the succoring object.

The ability to apprehend its helplessness depends on the protective shield against stimuli, whose action is thus the basis of relationships, the precondition of effective [[communication]].

For [[Melanie Klein]] (1952/1975), the distress associated with the [[death instinct]], a source of tremendous persecution, precipitates [[projection]].

This is the foundation of what she calls the schizoid-paranoid position.

When a human being is reduced to a state of [[helplessness]], subjected to a primal kind of passivity by the impositions of others, he or she may seek to regain mastery through repetition of the experience.

For Kreisler et al. (1966), too much distress of this kind may cause psychosomatic disorders; for Tustin (1972), the result may be recourse to autistic defenses.

The term '[[helplessness]]' ([[French]]: ''[[détresse]]''; [[German]]: ''[[Hilflosigkeit]]'') is used in [[psychoanalysis]] to denote the state of the newborn [[infant]] who is incapable of carrying out the specific [[action]]s required to [[satisfy]] its own [[need]]s, and so is completely dependent on other people (especially the [[mother]]).


--

The [[helplessness]] of the [[human]] [[infant]] is grounded in its 'prematurity' of birth, a fact which was pointed out by [[Freud]] and which [[Lacan]] takes up in his early writings.

Compared to other animals such as apes, the [[human]] [[infant]] is relatively unformed when it is born, especially with respect to motor coordination.

This means that it is more dependent than other animals, and for a longer time, on its parents.


--

[[Lacan]] follows [[Freud]] in highlighting the importance of the initial dependence of the [[human]] [[infant]] on the [[mother]].

[[Lacan]]'s originality lies in the way he draws attention to "the fact that this dependence is maintained by a world of [[language]].<ref>{{E}} p.309</ref>

The [[mother]] [[interpret]]s the [[infant]]'s cries as hunger, tiredness, loneliness, etc. and retroactively determines their [[meaning]] (see [[punctuation).

The [[child]]'s [[helplessness]] contrasts with the omnipotence of the [[mother]], who can decide whether or not to [[satisfy]] the [[child]]'s [[need]]s.<ref>{{S4}} p.69, 185</ref>

(The recognition of this contrast engenders a depressive effect in the [[child]].<ref>{{S4}} p.186</ref>)

---

[[Lacan]] also uses the concept of [[helplessness]] to illustrate the sense of abandonment and [[subjective destitution]] that the [[analysand]] feels at the [[end of analysis]].

<blockquote>"At the end of a [[training]] [[analysis]] the [[subject]] should reach and know the domain and level of the experience of absolute disarray."<ref>{{S7}} p.304</ref></blockquote>

The [[end of analysis]] is not conceived of by [[Lacan]] as the realization of some blissful plenitude, but quite the contrary, as a moment when the [[subject]] comes to terms with his utter solitude.

However, whereas the [[infant]] can rely on its [[mother]]'s [[help]], the [[analysand]] at the [[end of analysis]] "can expect [[help]] from no one."<ref>{{S7}} p.304</ref>

If this seems to present a particularly ascetic view of [[psychoanalytic treatment]], this is exactly how [[Lacan]] wishes it to be seen; [[psychoanalysis]] is, in [[Lacan]]'s words, a "long subjective acesis."<ref>{{E}} p.105</ref>

[[Category:Imaginary]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Development]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]

==See Also==
* [[Anxiety]]
* [[Illusion]]
* [[Narcissitic injury]]
* [[Thing]]
* [[Trauma]]

==References==
<references/>
# Freud, Sigmund. (1925). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. SE, 20: 87-172.
# ——. (1950c [1895]). Project for a scientific psychology. SE, 1: 281-387.

[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]

[[Category:New]]
[[Category:Enotes]]
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu