Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Existence

2,406 bytes added, 06:10, 26 April 2006
no edit summary
existence (existence) The term 'existence' is employed by Lacan in

various ways (see éiûek, 1991: 136-7):



e Existence in the symbolic This sense of existence is to be understood in

the context of Freud's discussion of the 'judgement of existence', by which the

existence of an entity is affirmed prior to attributing any quality to it (see

Freud, 1925h; see BEJAHUNG). Only what is integrated in the symbolic order

fully 'exists' in this sense, since 'there is no such thing as a prediscursive

reality' (S20, 33). It is in this sense that Lacan argues that 'woman does not

exist' (Lacan, 1973a: 60); the symbolic order contains no signifier for femi-

ninity, and hence the feminine position cannot be fully symbolised.

It is important to note that, in the symbolic order, 'nothing exists except on

an assumed foundation of absence. Nothing exists except insofar as it does not

exist' (Ec, 392). In other words, everything that exists in the symbolic order

only exists by virtue of its difference to everything else. It was Saussure who

first pointed this out when he argued that in language there are no positive

terms, only differences (Saussure, 1916).



e Existence in the real In this sense, it is only that which is impossible to

symbolise that exists: the impossible Thing at the heart of the subject. 'There is

in effect something radically unassimilable to the signifier. It's quite simply

the subject's singular existence' (S3, 179). This is the existence of the subject

of the unconscious, S, which Lacan describes as an 'ineffable, stupid exis-

tence' (E, 194).

This second sense of the term existence is exactly the opposite of existence

in the first sense. Whereas existence in the first sense is synonymous with

Lacan's use of the term BEING, existence in the second sense is opposed to

being.

Lacan coins the neologism ex-sistence to express the idea that the heart of

our being (Kern unseres Wesen) is also radically Other, strange, outside (Ec,

l1); the subject is decentred, his centre is outside of himself, he is ex-centric.

Lacan also speaks of the 'ex-sistence (Entstellung) of desire in the dream' (E,

264), since the dream cannot represent desire except by distorting it.
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu