24,656
edits
Changes
Code
,no edit summary
code (code) Lacan borrows the term 'code' from Roman Jakobson's
theory of communication. Jakobson presents his opposition 'code vs mes-
sage' as an equivalent of Saussure's langue vs parole. However, Lacan draws
an important distinction between the concepts of LANGUAGE and code (see E,
84). Codes are the province of animal communication, not of intersubjective
communication. Whereas the elements of a language are SIGNIFIERs, the ele-
ments of a code are indices (see INDEX). The fundamental difference is that
there is a fixed bi-univocal (one-to-one) relationship between an index and its
referent, whereas there is no such relationship between a signifier and a
referent or between a signifier and a signified. Because of the bi-univocal
relation of indices and referents, codes lack what Lacan regards as the
fundamental feature of human languages: the potential for ambiguity and
equivocation (see Lacan, 1973b).
Lacan is not always consistent in maintaining this opposition between code
and language. In the seminar of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the
elementary cell of the graph of desire, he designates one point as the code,
which he also designates as the place of the Other and the battery of signifiers.
In this case, it is clear that the term 'code' is being used in the same sense as
the term 'language', namely, to designate the set of signifiers available to the
subject.