24,656
edits
Changes
Drive
,no edit summary
{| align="right" style="margin-left:10px;line-height:2.0em;text-align:justify;background-color:#fcfcfc;border:1px solid #aaa" | [[French]]: ''[[pulsion]]''|-| [[German]]: ''[[Trieb{{Bottom}} ==Drive and Instinct=====BodySigmund Freud===The [[Freud]]'s concept of the [[drive]] is central to his theory of [[human]] [[sexuality]]; it lies at the heart of his theory of [[sexuality]]. For [[Freud]], or the distinctive feature of [[human]] [[instinctsexuality]] -- as opposed to the sexual life of other animals -- is that it is usually translated in English, is not regulated by any [[instinct]] -- a concept which implies a relatively fixed and innate relationship to an [[object]] -- but by the [[drive]]s -- which differ from [[instinct]]s in that exists they are extremely variable, and develop in ways which are contingent on the border life history of the [[subject]]. ===Jacques Lacan===[[Lacan]] insists on maintaining the [[Freud]]ian distinction between [[drive]] and [[instinct]].<ref>{{E}} p.301</ref> Whereas [[instinct]] denotes a mythical [[linguistic|pre-linguistic]] [[need]], the [[drive]] is completely removed from the realm of [[biology]]. ====Aim of the Drive====The [[drive]]s differ from [[biological]] [[need]]s in that they can never be [[satisfied]], and do not aim at an [[object]] but rather circle perpetually round it. [[Lacan]] argues that the somatic purpose of the [[drive]] (''[[Triebziel]]'') is not to reach a ''goal'' (bodilya final destination) but to follow its ''aim'' (the way itself), which is to circle round the [[object]].<ref>{{S11}} p.168</ref> Thus the real purpose of the [[drive]] is not some mythical goal of full [[satisfaction]], but to return to its circular path, and the mentalreal source of [[enjoyment]] is the [[repetition|repetitive movement]] of this closed circuit. ====Drive as Cultural and Symbolic Construct====[[Lacan]] reminds his readers that [[Freud]] defined the [[drive]] as a montage composed of four discontinuous elements: the pressure, the end, the object and the source. The [[drive]] cannot therefore be conceived of as "some ultimate given, something archaic, primordial."<ref>{{S11}} p.162</ref> It consists is a thoroughly [[culture|cultural]] and [[symbolic]] construct. [[Lacan]] thus empties the concept of a quantity the [[drive]] of energy the lingering references in [[Freud]]'s work to energetics and its psychical representativehydraulics. ==The Freudian Circuit of the Drive==[[Lacan]] incorporates the four elements of the [[drive ]] in his theory of the [[drive]]'s circuit. In this circut, the [[drive]] originates in an [[erogenous zone]]. This circuit is "a constant force structured by the three grammatical voices. # The active voice (e.g. to see) # The reflexive voice (e.g. to see oneself) # The passive voice (e.g. to be seen) ===Activity and Passivity===The first of these two times (active and reflexive voices) are autoerotic; they lack a biological nature[[subject]]. Only in the third time (the passive voice), emanating from organic sourceswhen the [[drive]] completes its circuit, does "a new subject" appear (which is to say that before this time, there was no subject). Although the third time is the passive voice, the [[drive]] is always has essentially active, which is why [[Lacan]] writes that the third time not as "to be seen" but as its aim its own satisfaction through "to make oneself be seen." Even supposedly "passive" phases of the elimination [[drive]] such as [[masochism]] involve [[activity]].<ref>{{S11}} p.200</ref> The circuit of the state [[drive]] is the only way for the [[subject]] to transgress the [[pleasure principle]]. ==The Partial Nature of tension which operates at the source Drives==[[Freud]] argued that [[sexuality]] is composed of a number of [[drive|partial drives]] ([[Ger]]. ''[[drive|Partieltrieb]]'') such as the [[drive|oral drive]] and the [[drive|anal drive itself]], each specified by a different source (a different erotogenic zone). At first these component [[drive]]s function anarchically and independently (viz.the "polymorphous perversity" of children), but in puberty they become organized and fused together under the priamcy of the genital organs.<ref>1972 [1965]: 140{{F}} p.1905d.</ref> ===Differences between Freud and Lacan===[[Lacan]] emphasizes the partial nature of all [[drive]]s, but differs from [[Freud]] on two points: # [[Lacan]] rejects the idea that the partial drives can ever attain any complete organization or fusion, aruging that the priamcy of the genital zone, if achieved, is always a highly precarious affair. : He thus challenges the notion, put forward by some psychoanalysts after [[Freud]], of a genital drive in which the partial drives are completely integrated in a harmonious relation.
===LibidoThe Four Partial Drives===The model of the [[FreudLacan]]ian identifies four partial drives: the [[drive|oral drive]] is , the [[libidodrive|anal drive]] - sexual energy - or what is also translated as 'wish' or 'desire'. According to Laplanche and Leclaire, it is the introduction of the [[drive|scopic drive into the sphere of need that marks the distinction between a need ]], and desire: 'the drive introduces into the sphere of need an erotic quality: libido will be substituted for need' (1972 [1965]: 140). [[Libidodrive|invocatory drive]] is the fundamental motive force of human beings; it is unconscious desire which is the organizing principle of all human thought, action and social relations.
{| style="width:75%; height:200px" border="1" cellpadding=Drive and Instinct"5" cellspacing="0" align="center"|+ '''[[:Image:Lacan-tablepartialdrives.jpg|Table of partial drives]]'''<BR>! align="center" | !! align="center" | PARTIAL DRIVE !! align="center" | EROGENOUS ZONE !! align="center" | PARTIAL OBJECT !! align="center" | VERB|-| align="center" | D| align="center" | [[Oral]] [[drive]] || align="center" | [[Erogenous zone|Lips]] || align="center" | [[Partial object|Breast]] || align="center" | To suck|-| align="center" | D| align="center" | [[Anal]] [[drive]] || align="center" | [[Erogenous zone|Anus]] || align="center" | [[Partial object|Faeces]] || align="center" | To shit|-| align="center" | d| align="center" | [[LacanScopic]] insisted on the need to retain the Freudian distinction between the [[drive]] and || align="center" | [[Erogenous zone|Eyes]] || align="center" | [[Partial object|Gaze]] || align="center" | To see|-| align="center" | d| align="center" | [[instinctInvocatory]], and in his early work the [[drive]] is closely associated with desire. || align="center" | [[Erogenous zone|Ears]] || align="center" | [[Partial object|Voice]] || align="center" | To hear|}
===Differences with Freud=The Lacanian Matheme for the Drive==In 1957, in the context of the [[graph of desire]], [[Lacan]]proposes the formula ('''S <> D'''s theory of ) as the [[matheme]] for the [[drive]], however, differed from Freud's in two important respects.
This formula is to be read: the [[bar]]ed [[Freudsubject]] argued that sexuality was composed of a series of partial drives which he defined as the oral, anal and phallic phases. These phases become integrated into a single, whole, genital drive after the resolution of the Oedipus complex. Contrary in relation to Freud[[demand]], Lacan argues that all drives are partial in the sense that there is never a single integrated harmonious resolution fading of the drives in [[subject]] before the subject. Furthermore, a partial drive does not represent a part insistence of a singular unified drive, but rather the partiality of the drive in the reproduction of sexuality[[demand]] that persists without any [[conscious]] [[intention]] to sustain it.
==See Also==
__NOTOC__