Changes

Thus this is no wonder that ''jouissance'' (of which one must not forget the [[legal]] origin, fruit and tenure) is introduced early in its opposition to the functional: "''Jouissance'' is what is useless." The [[superego]], the [[concept]] of [[Freud]]'s second [[topography]] to which he gave a repressive [[meaning]] ([[Kant]]'s [[Moral]] Law), Lacan did not consider it less brutal, but he also deems it [[obscene]], and changes its orientation by enjoining it ''Jouis!'' (Yes, I mean the Law, I heard, ''j'ouis'', her [[voice]], and she becomes my [[desire]]). And soon taking up residence in the field of sexuality, this approach brings about the following statements: a) "The ''jouissance'' of the Other, of the Other's [[body]] that symbolizes it, is not a [[sign]] of love." b) "Ultimately, one person's body is just a part of the Other's body." c) Finally,"…it is the Other who ''jouit''."<ref>Lacan J., Encore, [[The Seminar]] of [[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]], Book XX, 1972-1973, New York: W.W. Norton, 1998, p.23.</ref> Then, "there is a [[hole]] there and that hole is called the Other."<ref>''Ibid'', p. 113</ref>] Later on Lacan will declare that "the Other doesn't [[exist]]."

| {{#widgetWidget:MEJS15MEJS13