Changes

Most theories of The term '[[communicationconsciousness]] offered by modern ' ([[linguisticsFrench]]:''conscience''), as [[Sigmund Freud]] are characterised by two important features.

FirstlyIn the so-called 'topographical model', they usually involve a reference to [[Freud]] isolates consciousness as one of the category parts of intentionalitythe [[psyche]], which is conceived of as coterminous along with the [[unconscious]] and the [[consciousnesspreconscious]].

Secondly, they represent [[communicationLacan]] as a simple process in which a message is sent by one person (finds [[Freud]]'s remarks on [[consciousness]] far weaker than his formulations on the addresser) to another (the addressee).<ref>e.g[[unconscious]]. Jakobson, 1960: 21</ref>

However<blockquote>"While he [Freud] can give a coherent, balanced account of the majority of other parts of the psychic apparatus, both these features are put into when it's a question by the specific experience of [[communication]] in [[psychoanalytic]] [[treatment]]consciousness, he always encounters mutually contradictory conditions."<ref>{{S2}} p. 117</ref></blockquote>

According to [[SpeechLacan]], [[Freud] is revealed to possess an intentionality that goes beyond ]'s problems with discussing [[consciousconsciousness]] purpose.return again and again to haunt his theory:

Secondly, the speaker"The difficulties which this system of consciousness raises reappear at each level of Freud's message is seen to be not merely directed at another but also at himself; theorising."<ref>{{S2}} p.117</ref>

"In human speech particular, [[Lacan]] rejects the sender apparent attempts in [[Freud]]'s work to link the [[consciousness]]-perception system to the [[ego]], unless this link is always a receiver at the same time."<ref>{{S3}} pcarefully theorised.24</ref>

It can be said that If there is a link between the part [[ego]] and [[consciousness]], it is in terms of a [[lure]]; the speaker's message which is addressed to himself [[illusion]] of a fully self-[[transparent]] [[consciousness]] is subverted by the whole psychoanalytic experience (see [[unconsciouscogito]] intention behind the message).

When speaking to <blockquote>"Consciousness in man is by essence a polar tension between an ego alienated from the [[analyst]]subject and a perception which fundamentally escapes it, the [[analysand]] is also addressing a message to himself, but is not aware of thispure percipi."<ref>{{S2}} p. 177</ref></blockquote>

The task of the In 1954 [[analystLacan]] gives "a materialist definition of the phenomenon of consciousness."<ref>{{S2}} p.40-52</ref>However, matter is not to enable the be confused with [[analysandnature]] to hear the message he is ; [[unconsciousLacan]]ly addressing to himself by interpreting the argues that [[analysandconsciousness]]'s words, does not evolve from the [[analystnatural]] permits the [[analysandorder]]'s message ; it is radically discontinuous, and its origin is more akin to return creation than to him in its true, [[unconsciousevolution]] dimension. <ref>{{S7}} p.213-14; 223</ref>

Hence In the 1960s [[Lacan]] defines analytic rethinks the [[communicationillusion]] as the of a self-[[actconsciousness]] whereby "the sender receives (''Selbstbe-wu?tsein'') fully present to itself in terms of his own message from concept of the receiver in an inverted form[[subject supposed to know]]."<ref>{{Ec}} p.41 ==See Also== ==References==<references/ref>{{Les termes}}* PAGES 19-20, 40, 43, 83, 20-3, 71 [[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Sigmund Freud]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]]