Changes
no edit summary
(1929-)
Originally a teacher of [[German]], [[Baudrillard]] established himself as a [[sociologist]] in the late 1960s and is widely regarded as one of the most significant commentators on [[postmodernity]].
[[Baudrillard]] has moved from a [[Marx]]ist-inflected critical commentary on the affluent [[consumer society]] to an ambiguous position which can be interpreted either as a bleakly lucid perception that there is no escape from what [[Deboprd]] calls the [[society of the spectacle]], or as a horrified [[fascination]] with the shallowness of a [[postmodern]]ist society in which the [[sign]] has become a [[simulacrum]] that signifies nothing.
[[Baudrillard]]'s prolific output of books (most of them short), articles and interviews has brought him enormous [[media]] attention.
[[Baudrillard]]'s early studies of the [[consumer society]] are influenced by a variety of tendencies within [[sociology]] and [[philosophy]], ranging from [[Marx]]'s theory of [[commodity fetishism]] to [[Barthes]] of ''[[Mythologies]]'' (1957) and ''The Fashion System (1967) and from [[Debord]]'s denunciations of the '[[society of the spectacle]]' to [[Mcluhan]]'s celebrated proclamation that '[[the medium is the message]]'.
Packard's classic study of the 'hidden persuaders' of the advertizing industyr is also an important poitn of reference.
According to [[Baudrillard]], the [[consumer society]] is dominated by a system of object-signs (consumer goods and gadgets) which circulate endlessly and cosntitute an order of [[signification] which can be compared to the [[sign]]s of [[Saussure]]'s linguistic system.
Their [[use-value]] is less important than their ability to signify the status of their consumer; the posession of a washing amchine allows one to wash clothes, but it also signifies membership of a social group.
In a postindustrial society where the importance of economic production is in decline, it is consumption that binds society together.
The society described by [[Baudrillard]] in these early studies is remarkably similar to that depited by OULIP-member Georges Pec in his novel ''things'' (1965), in which an affluent couple live through the objects they purchase and consumer.
==Next==
With ''Symbolic Exchange and Death'' (1976), which provides the most sustained exposition of his later theory, [[Baudrillard]] depart scompletely from the quasi-[[Marxi]]st framework of his early books.
In the course of a far-ranging discussion of [[Saussure]], [[Mauss]]'s theory of the [[gift]] relationship (1923) and [[Freud]], [[Baudrillard]] now argues that, in the era of [[postmodernity]], [[sign]]s are replaced by [[simulacra]], and the real by [[hyperreality]].
Consumption itself gives way to the game of [[seduction]]s in which nothing real is at stake, and to a [[simulation]] in which [[sexuality]] itself is absorbed into a vacuous [[hyperreal]] [[pornography]] which is more real than any actual sexual encoutner could ever be.
In this world, the [[masquerade]] of [[sexuality]] described by Joan Riviere is the reality of sex.
Production and labor are now seen as quite irrelevant and political hopes for political change are dismissed as a nostalgia for an era of [[signification]] typical of the lost industrial age.
==Next==
[[Baudrillard]] is a deliberately provocative writer.
His contention that the imagianry Disneyland is a cosntruct designed to convince us of the reality of an America that now exists only as a [[hyperreal]] [[simulacrum]] of itself is seen by many as an entertaining paradox, but the claim that the Gulf War of 1990 would not take place (1991), followed by the assertion that it did not take place, seems to defy all logic.
Such statements are anticipated by the earlier claim that the only future war would be a [[hyperreal]] and dissuasive war in which no events would take place because there was no more space for actual warfare.
The underlyign argument is that the Gulf War was a simualted war or a reproduction of a war.
Whatever its human consequences, this was, for [[Baudrillard]], a war which consisted largely of its self-representation in the real time of media coverage.
==Next==
[[Baudrillard]] is a highly literate and literary stylist whose work contains some unexpected allusions.
He revives the [[pataphysics]], or science of imaginary solutions, of jarry to describe the inexorable build-up of weapon-systems which are designed not to be used, and the notorious claims about the Gulf War appear to allude to the title of Jean Giraudoux's play ''The Rojan War Will Not Take Place'' (1935), which ends with the Greek army going off to war in a fulfilment of Cassandra's unheeded prophecy.
[[Baudrillard]]'s style -and style of thought- often resemble sthe cultivate and glacial dandyism of a [[Baudelaire]], particularly in the fragmentary notations and observatiosn of the three volumes of ''Cool Memories'' (1987, 1990, 1995).
At other times, eh appears to adopt the pose of a latter-day Flaneur.
Indeed, the [[Baudrillard]] who drives accross a [[hyperreal]] America in a fast car seems to be the direct descendant fo the figure celebrated by both Baudelaire and [[Benjamin]].
Like his ancestor, the postmodern flaneur is, by definition, male, and his fantasy of sacrificing a woman in the deserts of the West has done little to recommend him to feminist readers.
==See Also==
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Marxist theory]]
[[Category:Postmodern theory]]
[[Category:Postmodern]]
[[Category:Literary theory]]
[[Category:Critical theory]]
[[Category:Theory]]
[[Category:Media theory]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:People]]
