Difference between revisions of "Desire of the analyst"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Top}}désir de l'analyste{{Bottom}} | {{Top}}désir de l'analyste{{Bottom}} | ||
| − | + | The phrase the "[[desire of the analyst]]" is an ambiguous one that seems to oscillate in [[Lacan]]'s [[Works of Jacques Lacan|work]] between two meanings: | |
| − | |||
| − | The phrase the | ||
==A Desire Attributed to the Analyst== | ==A Desire Attributed to the Analyst== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
The [[analyst]] is therefore not only a [[subject supposed to know]] but also a "[[subject]] supposed to [[desire]]." | The [[analyst]] is therefore not only a [[subject supposed to know]] but also a "[[subject]] supposed to [[desire]]." | ||
| + | Thus the phrase "the [[analyst]]'s [[desire]]" does not refer to the real [[desire]] in the [[analyst]]'s [[psyche]], but to the [[desire]] which the [[analysand]] attributes to him. | ||
| − | + | ===Psychoanalytic Treatment=== | |
| + | The task of the [[analyst]] throughout the [[treatment]] is to make it impossible for the [[analysand]] to be sure that he knows what the [[analyst]] wants from him; the [[analyst]] must make sure that his desire "remains an x" for the [[analysand]].<ref>{{S11}} p. 274</ref> | ||
| − | + | In this way the [[analyst]]'s supposed [[desire]] becomes the driving force of the [[analytic]] [[process]], since it keeps the [[analysand]] working, trying to discover what the [[analyst]] wants from him. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | <blockquote>"The [[desire]] of the [[analyst]] is ultimately that which operates in [[psychoanalysis]]."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 854</ref></blockquote> | |
By presenting the [[analysand]] with an enigmatic [[desire]], the [[analyst]] occupies the position of the [[Other]], of whom the [[subject]] asks '''[[Che vuoi?]]''' ("What do you want from me?"), with the result that the [[subject]]'s [[fundamental fantasy]] emerges in the [[transference]]. | By presenting the [[analysand]] with an enigmatic [[desire]], the [[analyst]] occupies the position of the [[Other]], of whom the [[subject]] asks '''[[Che vuoi?]]''' ("What do you want from me?"), with the result that the [[subject]]'s [[fundamental fantasy]] emerges in the [[transference]]. | ||
| − | ==A | + | ==A Desire Proper to the Analyst== |
| − | The other sense of the phrase the | + | The other sense of the phrase the "[[desire of the analyst]]" refers to the [[desire]] which must animate the [[analyst]] in the way he directs [[treatment]]. |
| + | ===What It Is Not=== | ||
This is easier to define negatively than positively. | This is easier to define negatively than positively. | ||
| − | It is certainly not a [[desire]] for the impossible.<ref>{{S7}} p.300</ref> | + | It is certainly not a [[desire]] for the impossible.<ref>{{S7}} p. 300</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | Nor is it a [[desire]] to "do good" or "to cure"; on the contrary, it is "a non-desire to cure."<ref>{{S7}} p. 218</ref> | ||
| − | + | It is not a [[desire]] that the [[analysand]] [[identification|identify]] with the [[analyst]]: | |
| − | + | <blockquote>"The [[analyst]]'s [[desire]] . . . tends in a direction that is the exact opposite of [[identification]]."<ref>{{S11}} p. 274</ref></blockquote> | |
| + | ===Truth of Desire=== | ||
Rather than [[identification]], the [[analyst]] [[desire]]s that the [[analysand]]'s own unique [[truth]] emerge in the [[treatment]], a [[truth]] that is absolutely different to that of the [[analyst]]; the [[analyst]]'s [[desire]] is thus "a desire to obtain absolute difference."<ref>{{S11}} p.276</ref> | Rather than [[identification]], the [[analyst]] [[desire]]s that the [[analysand]]'s own unique [[truth]] emerge in the [[treatment]], a [[truth]] that is absolutely different to that of the [[analyst]]; the [[analyst]]'s [[desire]] is thus "a desire to obtain absolute difference."<ref>{{S11}} p.276</ref> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
How is it that the [[analyst]] comes to be guided by the [[desire]] which is proper to his function? | How is it that the [[analyst]] comes to be guided by the [[desire]] which is proper to his function? | ||
| + | ===Training=== | ||
According to [[Lacan]], this can only occur by means of a [[training analysis]]. | According to [[Lacan]], this can only occur by means of a [[training analysis]]. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 50: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
| − | + | {{See}} | |
| + | * [[Analysand]] | ||
| + | * [[Analyst]] | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | * [[Desire]] | ||
| + | * [[Identification]] | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | * [[Subject supposed to know]] | ||
| + | * [[Training]] | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | * [[Transference]] | ||
| + | * [[Treatment]] | ||
| + | {{Also}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 74: | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
| + | {{OK}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | __NOTOC__ | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 24 August 2006
| French: désir de l'analyste |
The phrase the "desire of the analyst" is an ambiguous one that seems to oscillate in Lacan's work between two meanings:
A Desire Attributed to the Analyst
As well as attributing knowledge to the analyst, so also the analysand attributes desire to the analyst.
The analyst is therefore not only a subject supposed to know but also a "subject supposed to desire."
Thus the phrase "the analyst's desire" does not refer to the real desire in the analyst's psyche, but to the desire which the analysand attributes to him.
Psychoanalytic Treatment
The task of the analyst throughout the treatment is to make it impossible for the analysand to be sure that he knows what the analyst wants from him; the analyst must make sure that his desire "remains an x" for the analysand.[1]
In this way the analyst's supposed desire becomes the driving force of the analytic process, since it keeps the analysand working, trying to discover what the analyst wants from him.
"The desire of the analyst is ultimately that which operates in psychoanalysis."[2]
By presenting the analysand with an enigmatic desire, the analyst occupies the position of the Other, of whom the subject asks Che vuoi? ("What do you want from me?"), with the result that the subject's fundamental fantasy emerges in the transference.
A Desire Proper to the Analyst
The other sense of the phrase the "desire of the analyst" refers to the desire which must animate the analyst in the way he directs treatment.
What It Is Not
This is easier to define negatively than positively.
It is certainly not a desire for the impossible.[3]
Nor is it a desire to "do good" or "to cure"; on the contrary, it is "a non-desire to cure."[4]
It is not a desire that the analysand identify with the analyst:
"The analyst's desire . . . tends in a direction that is the exact opposite of identification."[5]
Truth of Desire
Rather than identification, the analyst desires that the analysand's own unique truth emerge in the treatment, a truth that is absolutely different to that of the analyst; the analyst's desire is thus "a desire to obtain absolute difference."[6]
It is in the sense of "a desire proper to the analyst" that Lacan wishes to locate the question of the analyst's desire at the heart of the ethics of psychoanalysis.
How is it that the analyst comes to be guided by the desire which is proper to his function?
Training
According to Lacan, this can only occur by means of a training analysis.
The essential requirement, the condition sine qua non for becoming an analyst, is to undergo analytic treatment oneself.
In the course of this treatment there will be a mutation in the economy of desire in the analyst-to-be; his desire will be restructured, reorganised.[7]
Only if this happens will he be able to function properly as an analyst.
See Also
References
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 274
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 854
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 300
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 218
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 274
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p.276
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre VIII. Le transfert, 1960-61. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.221-2
