Difference between revisions of "On Practice And Contradiction"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Imported from text file)
 
m (Text replacement - "class="book-info__params"" to "class="wikitable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;"")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="book"><div class="book-info"><div class="book-info__title">On Practice and Contradiction - Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek</div><div class="book-info__lead">Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek</div>
 
<div class="book"><div class="book-info"><div class="book-info__title">On Practice and Contradiction - Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek</div><div class="book-info__lead">Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek</div>
  
{| class="book-info__params"
+
{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;"
 
| Author:
 
| Author:
 
| Slavoj Zizek
 
| Slavoj Zizek

Revision as of 02:02, 7 June 2019

On Practice and Contradiction - Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek
Mao Tse-Tung, Slavoj Zizek
Author: Slavoj Zizek
File type: pdf
Series: Revolutions
Publisher: Verso
Year: 2007
Language: English
ISBN: 1844675874,9781844675876
Time Added: Wed Feb 13 2019 13:57:04 GMT+0300 (MSK)
Author: Slavoj Zizek
File type: pdf
Size: 11 mb
City:
Edition:
Pages: 199
Id: 391609
Time Modified: Wed Feb 13 2019 13:57:04 GMT+0300 (MSK)
Extension: pdf
Bibtex: "Mao Tse-Tung and Slavoj Zizek",
"On Practice and Contradiction"
F2a03eeeac81d1e78c05d583e3558ebf-d.jpg

<strong>Mao's early philosophical writings underpinned the Chinese revolutions and their clarion calls to insurrection remain some of the most stirring of all time. Maverick philosopher Slavoj Zizek's firecracker commentary reaches unsettling conclusions about the place of Mao's thought in the revolutionary canon.</strong>

These early philosophical writings underpinned the Chinese revolutions and their clarion calls to insurrection remain some of the most stirring of all time. Drawing on a dizzying array of references from contemporary culture and politics, Zizek's firecracker commentary reaches unsettling conclusions about the place of Mao's thought in the revolutionary canon.