Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Sadism/Masochism

1,482 bytes added, 22:29, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{Topp}}sadisme]]''/''[[masochisme{{Bottom}}
==Definition==
The terms "[[sadism]]" and "[[masochism]]" were coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1893, with reference to the [[Marquis de Sade]] and Baron Sacher von Masoch. Though the term sadism has a longer [[history]]. It first appears in a [[French]] [[dictionary]] in 1834, just twenty years after the [[death]] of De [[Sade]]. Krafft-Ebing used the [[terms]] in a very specific [[sense]], to refer to a [[sexual]] [[perversion]] in which [[sexual]] [[satisfaction]] is dependent upon inflicting [[pain]] on [[others]] ([[sadism]]) or upon experiencing [[pain]] oneself ([[masochism]]).
==Sigmund Freud==
When [[Freud]] took up the terms in his ''[[Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality]]'', he used [[them]] in the same sense as Krafft-Ebing.<ref>{{F}} ''[[Works of Sigmund Freud|Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality]]'', 1905d. [[SE]] VII, 125.</ref> Following Krafft-Ebing, [[Freud]] posited an intrinsic connection between [[sadism]] and [[masochism]], arguing that they are simply the [[active]] and [[passive]] aspects of a single [[perversion]].
==Jacques Lacan==
[[Lacan]] too argues that [[sadism]] and [[masochism]] are intimately related, both [[being]] related to the [[drive|invocatory drive]]<ref>{{S11}} p. 183</ref> Both the [[masochist]] and the [[sadist]] locate themselves as the [[object]] of the [[drive|invocatory drive]], the [[voice]]. However, whereas [[Freud]] argues that [[sadism]] is primary, [[Lacan]] argues that [[masochism]] is primary, and [[sadism]] is derived from it: "sadism is merely the [[disavowal]] of masochism."<ref>{{S11}} p. 186</ref> Thus, whereas the [[masochist]] prefers to [[experience]] the [[pain]] of [[existence]] in his own [[body]], the [[sadist]] rejects this [[pain]] and forces the [[Other]] to bear it.<ref>{{Ec}} p. 778</ref> [[Masochism]] occupies a special [[place]] among the [[perversion]]s, just as the invoking [[drive]] occupies a privileged place among the [[drive|partial drive]]s; it is the "[[limit]]-experience" in the attempt to go ''beyond'' the [[pleasure principle]].
sadism/masochism (sadisme/masochisme) ===Jouissance===The terms Although 'sadism' and [[jouissance]]'masochism' were coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1893, with reference is linked to the Marquis de Sade [[sensation]] of [[physical]] or [[mental]] [[pain|suffering]], there is an important [[difference]] between [[masochism]] and Baron Sacher von Masoch''[[jouissance]]''. Krafft-Ebing used the terms in In [[masochism]], [[pain]] is a means to [[pleasure]]; [[pleasure]] is taken in the very specific sensefact of [[pain|suffering]] itself, so that it becomes difficult to refer to a sexual PERVERSION in which sexual satisfaction is dependent upon inflicting distinguish [[pleasure]] from [[pain on others (sadism) or upon experiencing pain oneself (masochism)]]. When Freud took up the terms in his Three Essays With ''[[jouissance]]'', on the Theory of Sexualityother hand, he used them [[pleasure]] and [[pain]] remain distinct; no [[pleasure]] is taken in the same sense as Krafft-Ebing (Freud[[pain]] itself, 1905d). Following Krafft-Ebing, Freud posited an intrinsic connection between sadism and masochism, arguing that they are simply but the [[pleasure]] cannot be obtained without paying the active and passive aspects price of [[pain|suffering]]. It is thus a single perversion.Lacan too argues that sadism and masochism are intimately related, both being related to the invocatory drive (kind of ''deal'' in which he also calls the "[[pleasure]] 'sado-masochistic drive'; S11, 183). Both the masochist and the sadist locate themselves '' [[pain]] are presented as the object a single packet."<ref>[[Seminar]] of the invocatory drive, the voice27 February 1963. J. However, whereas Freud argues that sadism is primary, Lacan argues that masochism is primary, and sadism is derived from it[[The Seminar]]. Book VII: 'sadism is merely the disavowal The [[Ethics]] of masochism' (Sll, 186)[[Psychoanalysis]]. p.Thus, whereas the masochist prefers to experience the pain of existence in his own body, the sadist rejects this pain and forces the Other to bear it (Ec, 778)189.</ref>
Masochism occupies a special place among the perversions, just as the invoking drive occupies a privileged place among the partial drives; it is the 'limit-experience' in the attempt to go beyond the pleasure ==See Also=={{See}}* [[Existence]]* [[Drive]]||* [[Perversion]]* [[Pleasure principle.]]{{Also}}
== References ==
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
{{OK}}
[[Category:Sexuality]]
    == References ==<references/> [[Category:Lacan]][[Category:Terms]][[Category:Concepts]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]]__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu