7
edits
Changes
m
[[Image:Sem11.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=Seminar X|right]]RightPrevText=Seminar X|RightNextLink=Seminar XII|RightNextText=Seminar XII}}
* {{L}} | align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|-| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | 1963 - 1964| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[Seminar XI]]| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''[[The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-AnalysisSeminar XI|Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse]]''. Ed. <BR><big>[[Alan SheridanSeminar XI|The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis]]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1981.</big>|}
The blurb describes === Analysis, Science and Religion ===Lacan is suspicious of the rapport between psychoanalysis, [[religion]] and science. Did they not have a founding father and quasi-secret texts? Throughout his career, Lacan is adamant as to his fidelity to [[Sigmund Freud]], the founder of the discipline of psychoanalysis. Freud was "legitimately [[Subject supposed to know|the text subject presumed to know]]," at least as providing to the unconscious: "He was not only the subject who was presumed to know, he knew." "He gave us this knowledge in terms that may be said to be indestructible." "No progress has been made that has not deviated whenever one of the terms has been neglected around which Freud ordered the ways that he traced and the paths of the unconscious."illuminating insights into This declaration of allegiance contrasts with Lacan's critical study of Freud's [[dream]] about the mind dead son screaming "[[Father, can't you see I'm burning?]]" The main problem remains that of transference: the most controversial psychoanalyst since [[Name-of-the-Father]] is a foundation, but the legacy of the Father is sin, and the original sin of psychoanalysis is Freud's [[desire]] that was not [[analyzed]]".
This volume ==== Transference ====If transference is based on a year’s seminarthe enactment (<i>la mise en [[acte]]</i>) of the reality of the unconscious - what Lacan's [[deconstruction]] of the drive wants to bring to light - if desire is the nodal point where the motion of the unconscious, an untenable sexual reality, is also at [[work]], which what is to be done? The analyst's [[role]] is to allow the drive "to be made [[present]] in the reality of particular importance because the unconscious": he was addressing must fall from the idealized position so as to become the upholder of <i>objet a larger</i>, less specialist audience than ever before, amongst whom he could not assume familiarity with his workthe separating object.
For ==== Drive ====Lacan considers the drives as different from [[biological]] [[needs]] in that they can never be [[satisfied]] and in that they are fundamentally irreducible to any 'natural' function. The purpose of the drive is not to reach a [[goal]] (a final destination) but to follow its aim (the way itself), which is to circle round its object, the mysterious [[Objet (petit) a|objet a]]. The real source of <i>[[jouissance]]</i> is not the attainment of any satisfying goal but the [[repetitive]] movement of this closed circuit, as explicated through the [[Graph of desire|graphs of desire]]. In one of his listeners thenkey essays, "The Drives and for his readers nowtheir Vicissitudes" (1915, S.E XIV), he wanted “to introduce Freud defined <i>[[Trieb]]</i> as a certain coherence into montage of four discontinuous elements <i>Drang</i>, thrust; <i>Quelle</i>, the source; <i>Objekt</i>, the major concepts on which psycho-analysis is based”object; <i>Ziel</i>, namely the unconsciousaim. In all its components, repetitionthe drive is thoroughly symbolically mediated, a product of the transference child's introduction to and [[castration]] by [[language]] and the drive[[Symbolic|symbolic order]], rather than of innate biological 'instincts'.
----Lacan says of these components: "Such a list may seem quite natural; my purpose is to prove that the text was written to show that it is not as natural as that." Lacan integrates the aforementioned elements into the drive's circuit, which originates in an [[erogenous zone]], circles the object and returns to the erogenous zone. This circuit is [[structured]] by the three [[grammatical]] voices:<br>1. the [[active]] (to see)<br>2. the reflexive (to see oneself)<br>3. the [[passive]] (to make oneself be seen).<br>The first two are autoerotic; only in the passive [[voice]] a new subject appears, "this subject, the [[other]], appears in so far as the drive has been able to show its circular course." The drive is always active, which is why he writes the [[third]] [[instance]] as "to make oneself be seen" instead of "to be seen."<br>
In re-defining these four concepts he explores Lacan rejects the [[notion]] that [[partial]] drives can attain any [[complete]] organization since the primacy of the [[genital]] zone is always precarious. The drives are partial, not in the question [[sense]] thatthey are a part of a [[whole]] (a [[genital drive]]), but in that they only [[represent]] [[sexuality]] partially: they convey the [[dimension]] of <i>jouissance</i>. "The [[reality]] of the unconscious is [[sexual]] reality - an untenable truth," much as he puts it, moves cannot be separated from [[death]]. "Is psycho<i>[[Objet a]]</i> is something from which the subject, in [[order]] to constitute itself, has separated itself off as [[organ]]. This serves as [[symbol]] of the [[lack]], of the [[phallus]], not as such, but in so far as it is [[lacking]]. It must be an object that is separable and that has some rapport to the lack. At the [[oral]] level, it is the [[nothing]]; at the [[anal]] level, it is the locus of the [[metaphor]] - one object for [[another]], give the [[feces]] in [[place]] of the phallus -analysis the anal drive is the [[domain]] of the [[gift]]; at the [[scopic]] level, we are no longer at the level of [[demand]], but of [[desire,]] of the desire of the Other; it is the same at the level of the [[invocatory]] drive, which is the closest to the [[experience]] of the unconscious." The first two relate to demand, the second pair to desire. Under the [[form]] of <i>objet a </i>, Lacan groups all the partial drives linked to part [[objects]]: the [[breast]], feces, the [[penis]], and he adds the [[gaze]] and the voice. Here, he asserts the [[split]] between the eye and [[The Gaze|the gaze]] when he analyzes [[Holbein]]'s <i>[[scienceThe Ambassadors]]?</i> as a " to trap for the gaze"What (<i>piège à regards</i>), but also as a <i>dompte-[[regard]]</i> (the gaze is tamed by an object) and a <i>trompe-l'oeil</i>. In the foreground, a [[floating]] object, a [[sciencephallic]] that includes psycho[[ghost]] object gives presence to the -analysis?<font face=" Symbol" size="3">F</font> of [[castration]]. This object is the heart of the organization of desire through the framework of the drives.<br>
Dr ==English=={| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"|Author(s)|Title|Publisher|Year|Pages|Language|Size|Extension| rowspan="1" |Mirrors|-|Jacques Lacan argues in particular that there is a structural affinity between , Jacques-Alain Miller, Alan Sheridan|The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 11<BR>The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis<BR><small>0393317757, 9780393317756</small>|W. W. Norton & Company|1998|290[306]|English|4 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/100CF53924CD63450D1069603E4DBA53 <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>], [psychoanalysis|psychohttp://libgen.io/get.php?md5=100CF53924CD63450D1069603E4DBA53 <nowiki>[2]</nowiki>], [http://b-analysisok.cc/md5/100CF53924CD63450D1069603E4DBA53 <nowiki>[3]</nowiki>], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/344555 <nowiki>[4]</nowiki>], construed as the [http://bookfi.net/md5/100CF53924CD63450D1069603E4DBA53 <nowiki>[science5]</nowiki>] |-|Jacques Lacan|The Four Fundamental Concepts of the Psycho-analysis<BR><small>9780140552171, 9780393317756, 0140552170, 0393317757</small>|Peregrine Books|1986|300|English|2 Mb|djvu|[http://library1.org/_ads/38B6F9AFCE914FADC58D3F6D1BE7A4A2 <nowiki>[unconscious1]</nowiki>], and [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=38B6F9AFCE914FADC58D3F6D1BE7A4A2 <nowiki>[language2]</nowiki>] – the , [http://b-ok.cc/md5/38B6F9AFCE914FADC58D3F6D1BE7A4A2 <nowiki>[science3]</nowiki>] of , [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/1263558 <nowiki>[linguistics4]</nowiki>] being one of the significant discoveries of our , [http://bookfi.net/md5/38B6F9AFCE914FADC58D3F6D1BE7A4A2 <nowiki>[time5]</nowiki>]. |}
He also discusses the relation ==Related=={| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"|Author(s)|Title|Publisher|Year|Pages|Language|Size|Extension| rowspan="1" |Mirrors|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus (Eds.)|<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis and Culture</small><BR>Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Paris Seminars in English <small>0791421473, 0791421481, 9780791421475, 9780585045405</small>|State University of New York Press|1995|192|English|992 Kb|chm|[http://library1.org/_ads/FA1B303D5422872B892B7B9DBE37C83F <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=FA1B303D5422872B892B7B9DBE37C83F <nowiki>[psychoanalysis|psycho2]</nowiki>], [http://b-analysisok.cc/md5/FA1B303D5422872B892B7B9DBE37C83F <nowiki>[3]</nowiki>] to , [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/444132 <nowiki>[religion4]</nowiki>], [http://bookfi.net/md5/FA1B303D5422872B892B7B9DBE37C83F <nowiki>[5]</nowiki>]|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|<small>Suny Series in Psychoanalysis and reveals his particular stance on a wide range Culture</small><BR>Reading Seminar XI: Lacan's Four Fundamental Concepts of topicsPsychoanalysis : The Paris Seminars in English <small>0791421473, such as 0791421481</small>|State Univ of New York Press|1995|322|English|3 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/D8F4C8200841170E68A706B384D15987 <nowiki>[sexuality1]</nowiki>] and , [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=D8F4C8200841170E68A706B384D15987 <nowiki>[death2]</nowiki>], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/D8F4C8200841170E68A706B384D15987 <nowiki>[love3]</nowiki>] and , [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/801726 <nowiki>[libido4]</nowiki>], [http://bookfi.net/md5/D8F4C8200841170E68A706B384D15987 <nowiki>[alienation5]</nowiki>]|-|Roberto Harari|Lacan's Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis<BR><small>1590510828</small>|Other Press|2004|300|English|3 Mb|djvu|[http://library1.org/_ads/53F2226050A93744318887FBD777305C <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=53F2226050A93744318887FBD777305C <nowiki>[interpretation2]</nowiki>], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/53F2226050A93744318887FBD777305C <nowiki>[repression3]</nowiki>] and , [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/1323213 <nowiki>[desire4]</nowiki>], [http://bookfi.net/md5/53F2226050A93744318887FBD777305C <nowiki>[5]</nowiki>]|}
This book constitutes the essence French versions of Dr Lacan’s sensibility[[Jacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[Seminars]] Source: http://ecole-lacanienne. net* [[:File:Seminaire_11.pdf|Download]]<BR>{{Center|<pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_11.pdf</pdf>}}
There is no clearer statement of the ideas and issues which have aroused such passionate reactions in France, and which can now gain the hearing they deserve in the English-speaking world. __NOAUTOLINKS__ __NOTOC__[[Category:WorksSeminars]]
no edit summary
[[Image:Sem11.jpg|350px|right]]<BR>January 15 1964, marks the opening session of the [[seminars]] at the École Nationale Supérieure where, in the presence of celebrities (Lévi-[[Strauss]], [[Althusser]], Fernand [[Braudel]]) and a new younger audience, [[Lacan]] talks about the censorship of his [[teachings]] and his excommunication from official psychoanalytical circles. These political problems in Lacan''s own life naturally raise theoretical problems around psychoanalytic legitimacy as such. He wants to train [[The Four Fundamental Concepts analysts]] – and simultaneously interrogate the nature and possibility of Psychopsychoanalytic training – and, at the same time, address the non-Analysisanalyst by raising the following questions: Is psychoanalysis a [[science]]'' ? If so, under what [[conditions]]? If it is - the English translation "science of one the [[unconscious]]" or a "conjectural science of the pivotal works of [[Jacques Lacansubject]]." - what can it teach us about science?
=== The Concepts ===
<br>
What can be said for certain is that psychoanalysis constitutes a [[discourse]] - although Lacan will only take this concept on fully in [[Seminar XVII]] and later [[Seminar XX]] – and a praxis, which is in some sense therapeutic. Praxis, which "places [[The Subject|the subject]] in a [[position]] of dealing with the [[real]] through the [[symbolic]]," produces concepts; four are offered here, in the case of analytic praxis: [[Unconscious|the unconscious]], [[repetition]], [[transference]] and the [[drive]]. Of the four concepts mentioned, three were developed in Lacan's usage between 1953 and 1963, although all four find their roots in Freud. As to [[drives]], their importance for Lacan has increased since the study of <i>[[Objet (petit) a|objet a]]</i> in <i>[[Seminar X|L'angoisse]]</i>, as Lacan has increasingly distinguished between the concepts of drive and desire.
=====Description=Unconscious ====This classic text probes In "La [[Lettre]] volée" (<i>Écrits</i>) Lacan states that "the unconscious is the relationship between [[psychoanalysisdiscourse]] and of the [[scienceOther]] and ," [[religionmeaning]] as well as defining that "one should see in the unconscious the effects of [[speech]] on the subject." The unconsciousis the effect of the [[signifier]] on the subject - the signifier is what gets [[repressed]] and what returns in the [[formations]], of the unconscious. How then is it possible to reconcile desire linked to the signifier and to the Other with the [[repetitionlibido]], now an organ under the shape of the "[[transferencelamella]], and " the placenta, the part of the [[drivebody]] as from which the underlying concepts of subject must [[separate]] in order to [[psychoanalysis|psycho-analysisexist]].?
=====Back Cover=Repetition ====Dr Lacan’s writingsA new conception of repetition comes into play, whose functioning stems from two forces: automatism on the side of the signifier and especially the seminars for which he has become famous, have provoked intense controversies in French analytic circlesmissed yet desired [[encounter]] on the side of the drive, requiring as they do where <i>objet a radical reappraisal of </i> refers to the legacy bequeathed by Freud"[[impossible]]" [[Real]] (that which as such cannot be assimilated).
==French=={| class="wikitable floatright" width="250px" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right;margin-left:10px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:30px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="200px" style="padding-left:10px" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | PDF|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 janvier 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!mPhHWAiK!PQim_tY4n296k83e0ae4cWKssO2u7BnZcl6h_BbgPPo link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 22 janvier 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!qKo32AxL!iXABjymdFK4W9nd_U9X8NeF-mMbYZTF-Qv1VonJ7OyQ link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 29 janvier 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!LHhBjaiR!P0rej53bDd66toeIyJhaLBtSfYv1b7XDECa02aHXi98 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 5 février 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!uC5RRAQK!Pc6Hn4Ux86wxFrPBPZcuJOw_rF2xl2VNnWrbAiXo8mo link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12 février 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!6LhjCSzT!66m2GeEJXPMPeTocvtq4R7ngwIjD9TmQjtOG9k136Ow link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19 février 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!fbplEAbQ!j_oHdN9PQp_Jd71LsTCjQZQB6t2Pa0ra_M7HPbZJgxw link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 26 février 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!CDgBBApT!MMvz-QMFr_U5UJr46S_QAMmxsZjT-Msa45b5b-jkbFo link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 4 mars 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!nGhTXYAa!3_m3lzYJc_aYOOV9rgrHyqxcd4laUgI6YxDqEBbJVx4 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 11 mars 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!6awHCAKR!jZloAA3U9WRGQsRykQVYzw_HiHc2JoWSy4Co85L5ec8 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 avril 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!Ke5xGSJR!GVupryPH5h2sw-Bz2u3atGWfXuPdY02b9Oj2b2CDLxs link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 23 avril 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!3K5TmQoR!hWm5IMg29-V5eIYTRepVTusa5H-zJDblbly9uibGYq0 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 29 avril 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!HLpHlAiI!JSDM3Cv-zLcg9RGlqmYUmo6-YmGfN1OKUETzGuLidXI link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 6 mai 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!2HpRQQRI!skV4XD3kK8-Fqww5H0wneqn3DBH93fZ0WY0465sYCTI link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 13 mai 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!3C4xjIpZ!ONEQjKG7Y4FDOkgZqXPvoMICEEy3DfLhrGAHWccgfNs link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 20 mai 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!zGoRkYDR!P5WlT__sNek7oaV3gd-2yJ3SJyPbnP9_Sx56vJBD3iU link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 27 mai 1964| [https://mega.nz/#!6CwTEK7L!Qe5KHpzwLOGCZw3-aGejfYRqXgPGqp737UnYeFyQtQc link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 3 juin 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!ua5XnaCR!kHcBlpe_mBLd3khi89X4D59sGPFZwgXnYoaMf0oBGbA link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 10 juin 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!TCpT1KhA!CNgkQY6Mj2NTdwbAFWhPimd7b76NDlMHqGnCXV8gYmY link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 17 juin 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!DO5xUA7T!89NVhXzOzqpEWrEEvj2RDsgU8qcByLfpqC_koxCfFuU link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 24 juin 1964 | [https://mega.nz/#!OXhXiYoC!x1_Fi-psssOsim5_MIxoh464LLr6dmFPsWjdw9iyV30 link]|}
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
<!--<b>Le séminaire, Livre XI: Les quatre [[concepts]] fondamentaux de la [[psychanalyse]].</b><br>[[CategoryFrench]]: (texte établi par Jacques-[[Alain]] [[Miller]]), [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1973.<br>[[English]]: <b>Book XI:The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho[[Psychoanalysis]]</b> (edited by [[Jacques-AnalysisAlain Miller]]), New York: Norton, 1978. __NOTOC__-->
