Changes

 {| classalign="toccolourscenter" style="floatwidth: right600px; clearborder: right1px solid #aaa; margintext-align: 0 0 0.5em 1emleft;"|+ style="fontline-sizeheight: larger2.0em; marginpadding-left: 1em10px;"|-|- style="verticalwidth:100px;text-align: topleft; line-height:2.0em;"|style="backgroundpadding-left: #CCCCCC10px;" colspan="3" align=center|'''Download'''1967 - 1968|- style="verticalwidth:100px;text-align: topleft;"|* [httpline-height://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/19672.11.15.pdf 1967.11.15.pdf]* [http0em; padding-left://{{Archive}}/seminaireXVbis/AA.pdf AA.pdf]* 10px;"| [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1967.11.22.pdf 1967.11.22.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1967.11.29.pdf 1967.11.29.pdfSeminar XV]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1967.12.06.pdf 1967.12.06.pdf]* [http| style="width://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.01.10.pdf 1968.01.10.pdf]* [http300px;text-align://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.01.17.pdf 1968.01.17.pdf]* [httpleft; line-height://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/19682.01.24.pdf 1968.01.24.pdf]* [http0em; padding-left://bulk.lutecium.org/mirror/{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.01.31.pdf 1968.01.31.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.02.07.pdf 1968.02.07.pdf]* 10px;"| ''[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.02.21.pdf 1968.02.21.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.02.28.pdf 1968.02.28.pdfSeminar XV|L'acte psychanalytique]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.03.06.pdf 1968.03.06.pdf]* ''<BR><big>[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.03.13.pdf 1968.03.13.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.03.27.pdf 1968.03.27.pdfSeminar XV|The Psychoanalytic Act]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.05.15.pdf 1968.05.15.pdf]* [http:/</{{Archive}}/seminaireXV/1968.06.19.pdf 1968.06.19.pdf]big>

Since ''La logique du fantasme'', where he states that there is not a "sexual act," [[Image:Lacan]] questions the difference between the act, ''[[l'-Jacques-Le-Seminaire-N-1967-1968---L-acte]]'' and a mere action, ''agir''-Psychanalytique---Notes-De-Cours-Livre-1013426985_L. To make love would be an action, ''un agir'', and to get married an act, ''un acte'', because there is a commitment and a recognition, which entail ''[[repetitionjpg|border|350px|right]]'' and the inscription in the [[Other]].

The As to the different types of [[acts]] in [[signifierpsychoanalysis]] will appear soon, there is the founding act: before, the absence effects of contradiction between Saint John's "In the beginning was [[unconscious]] existed, but nobody knew that they existed. There is the entrance into [[analysis]] and the fact of becoming an [[analyst]], which are decisions and commitments. On the side of the Word[[analysand]],there are slips and failures, which lead Lacan to give an <i>Éloge de la connerie</i>, Praise of Folly. In analysis it is almost [[impossible]] to answer simply to the [[injunction]] " render unto [[truth]] the things that are truth's and Goetheunto folly the things that are folly's ," because the two overlap and then one finds "In the beginning was folly of truth even more often than the actiontruth of folly." Lacan then asserts The <i>passage à l'acte</i> and the "[[acting out]]"are activities that, although they fill a distressing [[hole]], reproduce the [[past]] instead of [[remembering]] it in [[words]]. On the irreducibility side of the sexual analyst, "[[outside]] the manipulation of [[transference]], there is no [[psychoanalytic]] act ." In [[order]] for the analysand to move to the function of analyst, the latter - while pretending to be the upholder of the [[subject]]-supposed-to-[[know]] - must accept [[being]] "reduced to the function of [[cause]] of a [[process]] in which the [[subject-supposed-to any truthful relation-know]] is undone." Since Moreover, in the end the analyst must accept to be "[[lovenothing]] more than a waste of the operation represented by the <i>[[objet]] a</i>," which will produce an effect of truth. The [[position]] of the analyst is untenable, and this is why he opposes "the most violent misconstruction, <i>mé[[connaissance]]</i>, as to the [[analytic]] act itself purely ." Besides, the analysand who experiences <i>désêtre</i> discovers, when becoming an analyst, that he is [[narcissism|narcissisticforced]]to restore for [[another]] the subject-supposed-to-know. The transmission would thus be compleed, very different from the <i>[[passe]]</i> itself. The [[psychoanalytic act]], a "setting into act of the subject" and a social pact "setting into act of the unconscious," is what remains of like a possible rapport between [[tragedy]] where the hero falls in the sexesend as a piece of trash.<br>

As to "In the different types beginning of psychoanalysis is transference," without any [[intersubjectivity]], because between the two partners the subject-supposed-to-know acts as a [[third]], as "the pivot from where everything that goes on in transference is articulated." This pivot is the signifier introduced in psychoanalysisthe [[discourse]] instituted by it, a [[formation]] as though detached from the analysand, which has nothing to do with the analyst's person. It is "a [[chain]] of letters that leads the not-known to [[frame]] [[knowledge]], there " which concerns [[desire]]. The [[Graph]] of Desire still guides the analysis but an [[identity]] is asserted between the [[matheme]] of the subject-supposed-to-know and the founding act: before<i>[[agalma]]</i> of [[Plato]]'s <i>The [[Symposium]]</i>, which presents "the effects pure angle of the unconscious existedsubject as the free rapport to the signifier, but nobody knew that they existeda signifier from which both the desire of knowledge and the desire of the Other are isolated. T"<br>here Lacan wants to establish, as to the passage from the analysand to the analyst, "an eaquation whose constant is the entrance into <i>agalma</i>" (this term being a sort of compromise between <i>[[objet a]]</i> and the [[phallus]]). Once "the desire that, in its functionning, uphelds the analysand has been resolved, the analysand no longer wants to remove the possibility of such [[desire,]] the [[remainder]] which, insofar as it determines his [[division]], makes him fall from his [[fantasy]] and destitutes him as subject." Lacan interprets the depressive position often noticed as the end of the analysis in [[terms]] of <i>désêtre</i> and "[[subjective]] destitution. "The subject sees its assurance sink, a [[self]]-assurance that comes from the fact fantasy in which everybody's opening onto the [[real]] is constituted." The subject realizes that the grasp of becoming desire is nothing other than that of a <i>désêtre</i>. "In this <i>désêtre</i> what is unveiled is the nonessential [[nature]] of the subject-supposed-to-know; the analyst-to-be is dedicated to the <i>agalma</i> of the [[essence]] of desire, even if it means that the analyst-to-be has to be reduced to an analystordinary signifier, since the subject is the signifier of the pure signifying relation." Does going through the fantasy, then, mean going toward the [[drive]] or toward a confrontation with the signifier? Thus Lacan answers: "The being of desire meets the being of knowledge to be reborn from their [[knot]] in a [[strip]] formed by the only side on which only one [[lack]] is inscribed, that which are decisions upholds the <i>agalma</i>." The <i>agalma</i> becomes the signifier of the bar that is put on the Other (A); the gap of (- <font face="Symbol" size="3">F</font>) opens in the Other; and commitmentsthe (<i>a</i>) falls from the Other. <br>

On Slavoj [[Zizek]] argues that "here we find the side inescapable deadlock that defines the position of the analysandloved one: the other sees something in me and wants something from me, but I cannot give him what I do not possess - or as Lacan puts it, there are is no rapport between what the loved one possesses and what the loving one [[sliplacks]]s . The only way for the loved one to escape this deadlock is to stretch out his hand toward the loving one and failuresto [[return]] love, which lead Lacan that is to give an ''Éloge de la connerie[[exchange]], in a [[metaphorical]] gesture, his status as the loved one for the status of the loving one. This [[reversal]] designates the point of [[subjectivization]]: the [[object]] of love changes into the subject the [[moment]] it answers the call of love. And it is only by way of this reversal that a genuine love emerges: I am truly in love not when I am simply fascinated by the <i>agalma</i> in the other, but when I [[experience]] the [[other, the]] object of love, as frail and lost, as [[lacking]] 'it', Praise of Follyand my love none the less survives this [[loss]]. "

The ''passage à l'acte'' and the {| class="acting outwikitable floatright" are activities that, although they fill a distressing hole, reproduce the past instead of remembering it in wordswidth="250px" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" align="center" bgcolor="ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;line-height:2. 0em; padding-left:30px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="200px" height"30" style="padding-left:10px" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="50px" style="padding-left:10px" | PDF|-

On the side of the | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15 novembre 1967 | [[analysthttps://mega.nz/#!XWBQwajI!p90WGQTNWlmv4vjQZ8KK7o9mC1_nh-TwLRXPZwq6CPM link]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px"outside the manipulation of | 22 novembre 1967 | [[transference]https://mega.nz/#!7aIiGIzK!BTr3aXHH37nH9BFhCNkFTgP2wkojh_bgy_hvU3VaytU link], there is no psychoanalytic act." |-In order for the [[analysand]] to move to the function of analyst, the latter | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding- while pretending to be the upholder of the left:15px" | 29 novembre 1967 | [[subject-supposed-tohttps://mega.nz/#!PeB2RCYC!mY9IcOFxs-know]NPyn7qcyHxk423DIXgI9RYxoGOdhZS8qM link] |- must accept being | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="reduced to the function of cause of a process in which the subjectpadding-supposed-to-know is undone.left:15px" Moreover, in the [[end of analysis | end]] the analyst must accept to be "nothing more than a waste of the operation represented by the '' 06 décembre 1967 | [[objet a]]''," which will produce an effect of [[truth]https://mega.nz/#!rHYWxIxJ!-08CqXOZeUSz3qlKepTz9hM79xK4MIvRDybnbo0OOgQ link]. |-The position of the analyst is untenable, and this is why he opposes | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px"the most violent misconstruction, ''| 10 janvier 1968 | [[méconnaissance]]'', as to the analytic act itselfhttps://mega."  Besides, the analysand who experiences ''désêtre'' discovers, when becoming an analyst, that he is forced to restore for another the subjectnz/#!TCZEnQJR!Y1-supposedTRS3oWDg3mH-todxCaw_8C43QNS8VmR2QR2svI2HOQ link]|-know. | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 17 janvier 1968 The transmission would thus be completed, very different from the ''passe'' itself| [https://mega. nz/#!KXYigCya!nlgiRN5nvzJjl-EJGLAS5k2ZoE9A1PDHw_qG4RkrRak link] ---|- The psychoanalytic act, a | bgcolor="#ffffff"setting into act of the subjectstyle=" and a padding-left:15px"setting into act of the | 24 janvier 1968 | [[unconscioushttps://mega.nz/#!XGJG3Qpb!hX0t1bDoW25_uCBhVeFxvT_qBD1mkpYBm88Hau5SdeU link]],|-| bgcolor=" is like a tragedy where the hero falls in the end as a piece of trash.#ffffff"In the beginning of psychoanalysis is [[transference]],style=" without any intersubjectivity, because between the two partners the subjectpadding-supposedleft:15px" | 31 janvier 1968 | [https://mega.nz/#!GKBWlajY!Q_M0oxwDquIqk-toJ05HuXQH_NLdLHXqAjwKVvYxlU2EQ link]|-know acts as a third, as | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="the pivot from where everything that goes on in transference is articulated.padding-left:15px" | 07 février 1968  This pivot is the | [[signifier]https://mega.nz/#!HSAinQAC!RREYWdLYUT0dJPEKuIQZHdMiTG6407rUhdSa2RNe5Ug link] introduced in the discourse instituted by it, a formation as though detached from the analysand, which has nothing to do with the analyst's person. |-It is | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="a chain of letters that leads the notpadding-known to frame knowledge,left:15px" which concerns | 21 février 1968 | [[desirehttps://mega.nz/#!SCZWSIYQ!Pt0NQfR-XICE_xqg1K8EdnTHGU8oew2Tpmhqtb3QXeA link]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 28 février 1968 The | [[Graph of Desire]] still guides the analysis but an identity is asserted between the [[matheme]] of the subjecthttps://mega.nz/#!6OJG3IRA!vTPC1udhZWr-supposedEAwGDM9EMkhs1vWYxqHf1y9o2-toMp0qw link]|-know and the ''[[agalma]]'' of [[Plato]]'s [[The Symposium]], which presents | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="the pure angle of the subject as the free rapport to the signifier, a signifier from which both the desire of knowledge and the desire of the Other are isolated.padding-left:15px"| 06 mars 1968 | [https://mega.nz/#!eXQixS7J!q-DL4vzZJAM7ELZWFDWyCf7LM2TZ9hvdN-fA3laOTY8 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 13 mars 1968 | [https://mega.nz/#!2TYgwapT!s_dO4AJSBv-04FqdVprzeo0yB_vt07nZr7I58TCIusk link]|- Lacan wants to establish, as to the passage from the analysand to the analyst, | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="an equation whose constant is the ''agalma''padding-left:15px" (this term being a sort of compromise between ''| 20 mars 1968 | [[objet a]]'' and the ''[[phallus]]'')https://mega. Once "the desire that, in its functioning, uphelds the analysand has been resolved, the analysand no longer wants to remove the possibility of such desire, the remainder which, insofar as it determines his division, makes him fall from his [[fantasy]] and destitutes him as [[subject]nz/#!SSY0waxY!Czd0Gfnir85ohMgcuyYWRGhh4r3kAznmQShw-5x7c4Y link]." |-Lacan interprets the depressive position often noticed as the end of the analysis in terms of ''désêtre'' and | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px"| 27 mars 1968 | [[subjective destitution]https://mega.nz/#!vbRkASLK!9tVxZSAdhmVp1cu2H2oszgbggz23G34v1Jqg71c0Tb8 link]". |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="The subject sees its assurance sink, a selfpadding-assurance that comes from the fantasy in which everybody's opening onto the real is constituted.left:15px" | 08 mai 1968  The subject realizes that the grasp of | [[desirehttps://mega.nz/#!GPZCWQSY!fEOAZeWtDqI4HcCAQCsESCkxYZ7VxdFsnhJ_2V6f55w link]] is nothing other than that of a ''désêtre''. "In this ''désêtre'' what is unveiled is the nonessential nature |}French versions of the [[subject-supposed-to-knowJacques Lacan|Lacan's]]; the analyst-to-be is dedicated to the ''agalma'' of the essence of [[desireSeminars]], even if it means that the analystSource: http://ecole-to-be has to be reduced to an ordinary [[signifier]], since the subject is the signifier of the pure signifying relationlacanienne."  ----netDoes going through the fantasy, then, mean going toward the * [[drive:File:Seminaire_15.pdf|Download]] or toward a confrontation with the signifier? Thus Lacan answers: <BR>{{Center|<pdf width="The being of desire meets the being of knowledge to be reborn from their knot in a strip formed by the only side on which only one lack is inscribed, that which upholds the agalma.500px"  The ''agalma'' becomes the signifier of the bar that is put on the Other (A); the gap of (- F) opens in the Other; and the (a) falls from the Other. height== Love ==Slavoj Zizek argues that "here we find the inescapable deadlock that defines the position of the loved one600px">File: the other sees something in me and wants something from me, but I cannot give him what I do not possess - or as Lacan puts it, there is no rapport between what the loved one possesses and what the loving one lacks. The only way for the loved one to escape this deadlock is to stretch out his hand toward the loving one and to return love, that is to exchange, in a metaphorical gesture, his status as the loved one for the status of the loving oneSeminaire_15. This reversal designates the point of subjectivization: the object of love changes into the subject the moment it answers the call of love. And it is only by way of this reversal that a genuine love emerges: I am truly in love not when I am simply fascinated by the ''agalma'' in the other, but when I experience the other, the object of love, as frail and lost, as lacking 'it', and my love none the less survives this loss."pdf</pdf>}}

[[Category<!-- 1967-1968<b>Le séminaire, Livre XV:Seminars]]L'acte psychanalytique.</b><br>[[Category:LacanFrench]]: unpublished.<br>[[Category:PsychoanalysisEnglish]]: unpublished. -->

[[Category:Seminars]] [[Category:Jacques Lacan]]__NOTOC____NOAUTOLINKS__