Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Signification

255 bytes added, 23:12, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{Les termesTop}}meaning|signification{{Bottom}}
A =====Jacques Lacan==========Early Work=====In [[signifierLacan]]'s pre-1950s writings, an element of the term "[[languagesignification]], " is used in a material general way to connote both [[representation]] of a [[linguistics|linguistic]] [[signmeaning]]fulness and importance.<ref>{{Ec}} p. 81</ref>
=====Example=====In [[psychoanalysis]]1946, for example, it is a [[phoneme|phonemicLacan]] sequence of the criticizes [[discourseorganicist]] that intervenes in [[consciouspsychiatry]] and [[unconscious]] processes to determine for ignoring "the significance of [[subjectmadness]] engaged in the discourse. "<ref>{{Ec}} p. 167, 153-4</ref>
A =====Later Work==========Symbolic Order=====In the period 1953-7 the term retains these vague [[signifiedassociations]] is with the idea or concept associated with a realm of [[signifiermeaning]], which together constitute the and [[linguistics|linguisticlanguage]] , and is thus located in the [[signsymbolic order]].<ref>{{S4}} p. 121</ref>
These elements, which come =====Latest Work==========Imaginary Order=====It is from 1957 on that [[Ferdinand de SaussureLacan]]'s use of the term takes on a direct reference to the [[linguistic theorySaussurean]] [[concept]], were introduced and problematized in shifts from the field of [[psychoanalysissymbolic]] by to the [[Jacques Lacanimaginary]] during his "[[return to Freudorder]]" phase in the early 1950s.
=====Ferdinand de Saussure=====
=====Relation between Signifier and Signified=====
[[Saussure]] reserves the term "[[signification]]" for the relation between the [[signifier]] and the [[signified]]; each sound-[[image]] is said to "signify" a concept.<ref>[[Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]. (1916) ''[[Saussure|Course in General Linguistics]]'', ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, trans. Wade Baskin, Glasgow: Collins Fontana. p. 114</ref>
Lacan relied on [[Signification]] is, for [[Saussure]], an unbreakable bond; the following main points [[signifier]] and the [[signified]] are inseparable as the two sides of Saussure's structural modela sheet of paper.
=====Jacques Lacan=====
=====Relation between Signifier and Signified=====
[[Image:SAUSSUREANALGORITHM.gif|right|thumb|Saussurean algorithm|The Saussurean algorithm]]
The [[linguistics|linguisticLacan]] argues that the [[signrelationship]] between [[signifier]] and [[signified]], which belongs to is far more precarious; he sees the [[bar]] between [[them]] in the [[languageSaussurean algorithm]]as representing not a bond but a rupture, establishes a relationship between a "[[signifierresistance]] (acoustic wave form) and a " to [[signifiedsignification]] (concept).<ref>{{E}} p. 164</ref>
The directed and temporal sequence =====Primacy of an articulation presupposes the division of [[language]] into two axes: Signifier=====Firstly, the [[syntagmatic axissignifier]], which refers is logically prior to a system of [[speech]] as a system of [[sign]]s capable of being combined and concatenated, and the [[paradigmatic axissignified]], which refers to a system is merely an effect of [[language]] as a system the play of [[signsignifier]]s selected and substituted for particular meanings.
A =====Slippage=====Secondly, even when [[signified]]s are produced, they constantly [[signslip]]and [[slide] taken in isolation does not define a ] underneath the [[meaningsignifier]]: a ; the only things that detain this movement temporarily, pinning the [[signifier]] can refer to several the [[signified]]s. Each sign thus gains its value by being placed in for a brief [[moment]] and creating the context [[delusion|illusion]] of other signs. The "break" between a flow of sounds and a flow of thought associates [[stable]] [[meaning]], are the signifier with a signified[[points de capiton]].
=====Metaphor and Metonymy=====[[FreudSignification]] is, in [[Lacan]]'s definition of [[psychoanalysiswork]] as , not a stable bond between [[treatmentsignifier]] through and [[speechsignified]] led , but a [[Lacanprocess]] to propose that -- the "[[unconscious is structured like a language]]." This theory, advanced and developed on process by which the basis play of Freud's work, led Lacan to assign to the [[signifier]] and to s produces the [[structuredelusion|illusion]] of the [[languagesignified]] a fundamental role in via the two tropes of [[unconsciousmetonymy]] processes of the speaking and [[subjectmetaphor]].
At the level of the =====Metonymy=====[[primary processSignification]]es, is [[Lacanmetonymic]] posited an analogy between because "signification always refers to [[condensation]] and [[metaphor]], as a substitution of [[meaning]], and between [[displacement]] and [[metonymy]], as a connection in [[meaninganother]]signification."<ref>{{S3}} p. 33</ref>
At the level of the expressions of the In [[unconsciousother]], the elaboration of [[symptom]]s appears to be analogous to the mechanisms of [[metaphorwords]], while witticisms and [[slips of the tonguemeaning]] appear to be analogous to metaphorical is not found in any one [[condensationsignifier]] and/or , but in the play between [[metonymy|metonymicsignifier]] s along the [[displacementsignifying chain]]and is therefore unstable.
The dynamic of [[desire]] <blockquote>"It is in the speaking [[subjectchain]] is expressed in an indefinite sequence of signifiers operating metonymically. However, this notion only holds because [[Lacan]] transformed [[Saussure]]'s definition of the [[linguistics|linguistic]] [[sign]] andsignifier that the meaning insists, more specifically, that but none of the [[signifier]] tis elements consists in the [[structure]] signification of [[language]]which it is at the moment capable. He referred to this as his "[[linguisteria]]" (''linguistérie'')<ref>{{E}} p.153</ref></blockquote>
=====Metaphor=====[[AnalysisSignification]] of the is [[neurosis|neurosesmetaphoric]], because it involves the [[structure]] crossing of the [[unconsciousbar]] formations, and the [[discourse]] "passage of [[psychosis|psychotics]] led [[Lacan]] to believe that the [[signifier]] is autonomous and dominant over into the [[signified]]."<ref>{{E}} p.164</ref>
The fundamental [[barmetaphor]] that separates S from s shows the relationship between the on which all [[subjectsignification]] and depends in the [[language]]. The [[subject]] is thus subordinated to [[signifierName-of-the-Father|paternal metaphor]]s, without always having access to the and all [[meaningsignification]] that they delimit. This is seen clearly in therefore [[psychosisphallus|psychotic]] [[discourse]], which unleashes the [[signifierphallic]].
The =====Lacanian Algebra=====[[primacy of Signification]] is designated by the signifier[[symbol]] implies that ''s'' in [[signifiedLacan]]s draw their coherence only from a ian [[network of signifiersalgebra]]. The relationship between (as in the [[signifiernotion]] and '''''s''(A)''' which labels one of the main nodes in the [[signifiedgraph of desire]] can come undone at any time).
The notation for the [[Lacan]] replaced [[Saussuresignified]]is also ''s "break" (''coupure''), Saussure's correspondence between the flow of which suggests that for [[signifierLacan]]s and the flow of term "[[signifiedsignification]]s, with " (the process by which the ''effect of [[point de capitonmeaning]]'' (literally, "quilting stitch"is produced), and the operation that stops the indefinite term "[[slip|slippagesignified]] " (the effect of [[meaning]] by making a deferred limitationitself) tend to overlap.
The logic of the [[signifier]] thus defined by [[Lacan]] calls for a change in how the [[unconscious]] processes are analyzed. [[Lacan]] focused on how the [[unconscious]] expresses itself in the [[patient]]'s [[language]], as revealed through meter, punctuation, and interpretative breaks. Within this logic, certain [[signifier]]s, such as "[[phallus]]", "[[Name-of-the-Father]]", and "[[lack in the Other]]", are invested with a fundamental [[metapsychology|metapsychological]] value.  ==See Also==* [[Signifier]]* [[Signified]]* [[=Signification]]* [[bar]]* [[points de capiton]]* [[meaning]] and Meaning=== References ==<references/> In the late 1950s, [[Category:Jacques Lacan]]establishes an opposition between [[Category:Termssignification]]and [[Category:Symbolicmeaning]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]]   signification (signification)    In Lacan's pre-1950 writings, the term 'signification' is used in a general way to connote both meaningfulness and importance (e.g. Ec, 81).  In 1946, for example, Lacan criticises organicist psychiatry for ignoring 'the significations of madness' (Ec, 167; see Ec, 153- 4). In the period 1953-7 the term retains these vague associations with the [[Real]]m of meaning and language, and is thus located in the [[Symbolic|sense]] order (S4, 121'').
The variety of ways in which these [[terms]] have been translated into [[English]] provides difficulty for the [[English]] reader of [[Lacan]].
=====Speech=====
[[Signification]] is [[imaginary]] and is the province of [[speech|empty speech]]; [[meaning]] is [[symbolic]] and is the province of [[speech|full speech]].
=====Psychoanalytic Interpretation=====
[[Interpretation|Psychoanalytic interpretations]] go against [[signification]] and bear on [[meaning]] and its correlate, [[meaning|non-meaning]] (''[[meaning|non-sens]]'').
=====Production of ''Jouissance''=====
Although [[signification]] and [[meaning]] are opposed, they are both related to the production of ''[[jouissance]]''.
[[Lacan]] indicates this by coining two neologisms: ''[[signification|signifiance]]'' (from the words [[signification]] and ''[[jouissance]]'') and ''[[signification|jouis-sense]]'' (from ''[[jouissance]]'' and ''[[sense]]'').
==See Also==
{{See}}
* [[Interpretation]]
* ''[[Jouissance]]''
||
* [[Language]]
* [[Meaning]]
||
* [[Metaphor]]
* [[Metonymy]]
||
* ''[[Point de capiton]]''
* [[Signified]]
||
* [[Signifier]]
* [[Signifying chain]]
{{Also}}
== References ==
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Language]]
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:OK]]
 
__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu