phallus (phallus) ==Phallus== Freud's work abounds in references to the penis. Freud argues that children of both sexes set great value on the penis, and that their discovery that some human beings do not possess a penis leads to important psychical consequences (see [[Castration Complex]]). However, the term 'phallus' rarely appears in Freud's work, and when it does it is used as a synonym of 'penis'. Freud does use the adjective 'phallic' more frequently, such as in the expression 'the phallic phase', but again this implies no rigorous distinction between the terms 'phallus' and 'penis', since the phallic phase denotes a stage in development in which the child (boy or girl) knows only one genital organ - the penis. Lacan generally prefers to use the term 'phallus' rather than 'penis' in order to emphasise the fact that what concerns psychoanalytic theory is not the male genital organ in its biological [[Real]]ity reality but the role that this organ plays in fantasy. Hence Lacan usually reserves the term 'penis' for the biological organ, and the term 'phallus' for the [[Imaginary]] and [[Symbolic]] functions of this organ. While this terminological distinction is not found in Freud's work, it responds to the logic implicit in Freud's formulations on the penis. For example, when Freud speaks of a [[Symbolicsymbolic]] equation between the penis and the baby which allows the girl to appease her penis envy by having a child, it is clear that he is not talking about the [[Real]] real organ (.<ref>Freud, 1917c). </ref> It can be argued, then, that Lacan's terminological innovation simply clarifies certain distinctions that were already implicit in Freud's work.
Although not prominent in Lacan's work before the mid-1950s, the term 'phallus' occupies an ever more important place in his discourse thereafter.
The phallus plays a central role in both the OEDIPUSCOMPLEx and in the theory of SEXUAL DIFFERENCE.
. The phallus and the Oedipus complex
The phallus is one of the three elements in the [[Imaginary]] triangle that constitutes the PREOEDIPAL PHASE. It iS an [[Imaginary]] object which circulates between the other two elements, the mother and the child (S3, 319). The mother desires this object and the child seeks to satisfy her desire by identifying with the phallus or with the phallic mother. In the Oedipus complex the father intervenes as a fourth term in this [[Imaginary]] triangle by castrating the child; that is, he makes it impossible for the child to identify with the [[Imaginary]] phallus. The child is then faced with the choice of accepting his castration (accepting that he cannot be the mother's phallus) or rejecting it.
e The phallus and sexual difference
Lacan argues that both boys and girls must assume their castration, in the sense that every child must renounce the possibility of being the phallus for the mother; this 'relationship to the phallus . . . is established without regard to the anatomical difference of the sexes' (E, 282). The renunciation by both sexes of identification with the [[Imaginary]] phallus paves the way for a relationship with the [[Symbolic]] phallus which is different for the sexes; the man has the [[Symbolic]] phallus (or, more precisely, 'he is not without having it' [il n'est pas sans l'avoir]), but the [[Woman]] does not. This is complicated by the fact that the man can only lay claim to the [[Symbolic]] phallus on condition that he has assumed his own castration (has given up being the [[Imaginary]] phallus), and by the fact that the [[Woman]]'s lack of the [[Symbolic]] phallus is also a kind of possession (S4, 153).
The status of the phallus: [[Real]], [[Imaginary]] or [[Symbolic]]? Lacan speaks of the [[Real]] phallus, the [[Imaginary]] phallus and the [[Symbolic]] phallus:
ï The phallus plays a central role in both the [[Oedipus Complex]] and in the theory of [[sexual difference]]. ==The phallus and the Oedipus complex== The phallus is one of the three elements in the [[Imaginary]] triangle that constitutes the [[preoedipal phase]]. It is an [[Imaginary]] object which circulates between the other two elements, the mother and the child.<ref>S3, 319</ref> The mother desires this object and the child seeks to satisfy her desire by identifying with the phallus or with the phallic mother. In the Oedipus complex the father intervenes as a fourth term in this [[Imaginary]] triangle by castrating the child; that is, he makes it impossible for the child to identify with the [[Imaginary]] phallus. The child is then faced with the choice of accepting his castration (accepting that he cannot be the mother's phallus) or rejecting it. ==The phallus and sexual difference== Lacan argues that both boys and girls must assume their castration, in the sense that every child must renounce the possibility of being the phallus for the mother; this 'relationship to the phallus . . . is established without regard to the anatomical difference of the sexes'.<ref>E, 282</ref> The renunciation by both sexes of identification with the [[imaginary]] phallus paves the way for a relationship with the [[symbolic]] phallus which is different for the sexes; the man has the [[symbolic]] phallus (or, more precisely, 'he is not without having it' [''il n'est pas sans l'avoir'']), but the [[Woman]] does not. This is complicated by the fact that the man can only lay claim to the [[symbolic]] phallus on condition that he has assumed his own castration (has given up being the [[imaginary]] phallus), and by the fact that the [[woman]]'s lack of the [[Symbolic]] phallus is also a kind of possession.<ref>S4, 153</ref> The status of the phallus: [[Real]], [[Imaginary]] or [[Symbolic]]? Lacan speaks of the [[real]] phallus , the [[imaginary]] phallus and the [[symbolic]] phallus: ==The [[real]] phallus== As has already been observed, Lacan usually uses the term 'penis' to denote the [[Realreal]] biological organ and reserves the term 'phallus' to denote the [[Imaginaryimaginary]] and [[Symbolicsymbolic]] functions of this organ. However, he does not always maintain this usage, occasionally using the term '[[Realreal]] phallus' to denote the biological organ, or using the terms '[[Symbolicsymbolic]] phallus' and '[[Symbolicsymbolic]] penis' as if they were synonymous (.<ref>S4, 153). </ref> This apparent confusion and semantic slippage has led some commentators to argue that the supposed distinction between the phallus and the penis is in fact highly unstable and that 'the phallus concept is the site of a regression towards the biological organ' (.<ref>Macey, 1988: 191).</ref> While the [[Imaginaryimaginary]] phallus and the [[Symbolicsymbolic]] phallus are discussed more [[Symbolicsymbolic]] phallus. The phallus has no corresponding female signifier; 'thephallus is a symbol to which there is no correspondent, no equivalent. It's a matter of a dissymmetry in the signifier.'<ref>S3, 176</ref> Both male and female subjects assume their sex via the [[Symbolic]] phallus. Unlike the [[Imaginary]] phallus, the [[Symbolic]] phallus cannot be negated, for on the [[Symbolic]] plane an absence is just as much a positive entity as a presence.<ref>see E, 320</ref> Thus even the [[Woman]], who lacks the [[Symbolic]] phallus in one way, can also be said to possess it, since not having it the [[Symbolic]] is itself a form of having.<ref>S4, 153</ref> Conversely, the assumption of the [[Symbolic]] phallus by the man is only possible on the basis of the prior assumption of his own castration. Lacan goes on in 1961 to state that the [[Symbolic]] phallus is that which appears in the place of the lack of the signifier in the Other.<ref>S8, 278-8 1</ref> It is no ordinary signifier but the [[Real]] presence of desire itself.<ref>S8, 290</ref> In 1973 he states that the [[Symbolic]] phallus is 'the signifier which does not have a signified'.<ref>S20, 75</ref>
phallus is a symbol to which there is no correspondent, no equivalent. It's a
matter of a dissymmetry in the signifier' (S3, 176). Both male and female
subjects assume their sex via the The [[Symbolic]] phallus.Unlike the [[Imaginary]] phallus, the [[Symbolic]] phallus cannot be negated, for on the [[Symbolic]] plane an absence is just as much a positive entity as a presence (see E, 320). Thus even the [[Woman]], who lacks the [[Symbolic]] phallus written <fi in one way, can also be said to possess it, since not having it the [[Symbolic]] is itself a form of having (S4, 153). Conversely, the assumption of the [[Symbolic]] phallus by the man is only possible on the basis of the prior assumption of his own castrationLacanian algebra.
However, Lacan goes on in 1961 to state warns his students that the complexity of this symbol might be missed if they simply identify it with the [[Symbolic]] phallus is that which appears in the place of the lack of the signifier in the Other (S8, 278-8 1). It is no ordinary signifier but the [[Real]] presence of desire itself (<ref>S8, 290). In 1973 he states that the [[Symbolic]] phallus is 'the signifier which does not have a signified' (S20, 75).296</ref>
The [[Symbolic]] phallus is written <fi in Lacanian algebra. However, Lacan warns his students that the complexity of this symbol might be missed if they simply identify it with the [[Symbolic]] phallus (S8, 296). The symbol is more correctly understood as designating 'the phallic function' (.<ref>S8, 298). In the early 1970s Lacan incorporates this symbol of the phallic function in his formulae of sexuation. Using predicate logic to articulate the problems of sexual difference, Lacan devises two formulae for the masculine position and two formulae for the feminine position. All four formulae revolve around the phallic function, which is here equivalent with the function of castration.</ref>
e Criticisms In the early 1970s Lacan incorporates this symbol of Lacan Of all Lacan's ideas, the phallic function in his concept formulae of the phallus is perhaps the one which has given rise to most controversy. Objections to Lacan's concept fall into two main groupssexuation.
Firstly, some feminist writers have argued that the privileged position Lacan accords Using predicate logic to articulate the phallus means that he merely repeats the patriarchal gestures problems of Freud (e.g. Groszsexual difference, 1990). Other feminists have defended Lacan, arguing that his distinction between devises two formulae for the phallus masculine position and two formulae for the penis provides a way of accounting for sexual difference which is irreducible to biology (e.g. Mitchell and Rose, 1982)feminine position.
The second main objection to Lacan's concept of All four formulae revolve around the phallus is that put forward by Jacques Derrida (Derridaphallic function, 1975) and echoed by others. Derrida argues that, despite Lacan's protestations of anti-transcendentalism, the phallus operates as a transcendental element which acts as an ideal guarantee of meaning. How can there be such a thing as a 'privileged signifier', asks Derrida, given that every signifier is defined only by its differences from other signifiers? The phallus, in other words, reintroduces here equivalent with the metaphysics function of presence which Derrida denominates as logocentrism, and thus Derrida extensively by Lacan than the [[Real]] phallus, he does not entirely ignore the lattercastration. On the contrary, the [[Real]] penis has an important role to play in the Oedipus complex ==Criticisms of the little boyLacan == Of all Lacan's ideas, for it is precisely via this organ that his sexuality makes itself felt in infantile masturbation; this intrusion concept of the [[Real]] in the [[Imaginary]] preoedipal triangle phallus is what transforms perhaps the triangle from something pleasurable one which has given rise to something which provokes anxiety (S4, 225-6; S4, 341)most controversy.The question posed in the Oedipus complex is that of where the [[Real]] phallus is located; the answer required for the resolution of this complex is that it is located in the [[Real]] father (S4, 281). The [[Real]] phallus is written H in Lacanian algebraObjections to Lacan's concept fall into two main groups.
e The [[Imaginary]] phallus When Lacan first introduces the distinction between penis and phallus, the phallus refers to an [[Imaginary]] object (S4, 31). This is the 'image of the penis' (E, 319), the penis imagined as a part-object which may be detached from the body by castration (E, 315), the 'phallic image' (E, 320). The [[Imaginary]] phallus is perceived by the child in the preoedipal phase as the object of the mother's desire, as that which she desires beyond the child; the child thus seeks to identify with this object. The Oedipus complex and the [[Castration Complex]] involve the renunciation of this attempt to be the [[Imaginary]] phallus. The [[Imaginary]] phallus is written 9 (lower-case phi) in Lacanian algebra, which also represents phallic signification.
Castration is written -e (minus lower-case phi).
Firstly, some feminist writers have argued that the privileged position Lacan accords to the phallus means that he merely repeats the patriarchal gestures of Freud (e.g. Grosz, 1990).
e The [[Symbolic]] phallus The [[Imaginary]] Other feminists have defended Lacan, arguing that his distinction between the phallus and the penis provides a way of accounting for sexual difference which circulates betweenis irreducible to biology (e.g. Mitchell and Rose, 1982).
mother and child serves to institute the first dialectic in the child's life, which,
although it is an [[Imaginary]] dialectic, already paves the way towards the
[[Symbolic]], since an [[Imaginary]] element is circulated in much the same way as
a signifier (The second main objection to Lacan's concept of the phallus becomes an '[[Imaginary]] signifier'is that put forward by Jacques Derrida (Derrida, 1975)and echoed by others. Thus Lacan's
formulations on Derrida argues that, despite Lacan's protestations of anti-transcendentalism, the [[Imaginary]] phallus in the seminar operates as a transcendental element which acts as an ideal guarantee of 1956-7 are accom-meaning.
panied by statements How can there be such a thing as a 'privileged signifier', asks Derrida, given that the phallus every signifier is also a [[Symbolic]] object (S4, 152) anddefined only by its differences from other signifiers?
that The phallus, in other words, reintroduces the metaphysics of presence which Derrida denominates as logocentrism, and thus Derrida extensively by Lacan than the [[real]] phallus is a signifier (S4, 191)he does not entirely ignore the latter. The idea that the phallus is a signifier is
taken up again and further developed On the contrary, the [[real]] penis has an important role to play in the 1957Oedipus complex of the little boy, for it is precisely via this organ that his sexuality makes itself felt in infantile masturbation; this intrusion of the [[Real]] in the [[Imaginary]] preoedipal triangle is what transforms the triangle from something pleasurable to something which provokes anxiety.<ref>S4, 225-8 seminar and becomes the6; S4, 341</ref>
principle element of Lacan's theory The question posed in the Oedipus complex is that of where the [[real]] phallus thereafteris located; the phallus answer required for the resolution of this complex is that it islocated in the [[real]] father.<ref>S4, 281</ref>
described as 'the signifier of the desire of the Other' (E, 290), and the signifierThe [[real]] phallus is written H in Lacanian algebra.
of jouissance (E==The [[Imaginary]] phallus==When Lacan first introduces the distinction between penis and phallus, 320)the phallus refers to an [[Imaginary]] object.<ref>S4, 31</ref>
These arguments are stated in their most definitive form in LacanThis is the 's paper onimage of the penis',<ref>E, 319</ref> the penis imagined as a part-object which may be detached from the body by castration,<ref>E, 315</ref> the 'phallic image'.<ref>E, 320</ref>
'The signification [[Imaginary]] phallus is perceived by the child in the preoedipal phase as the object of the phallusmother' (Lacans desire, 1958c):as that which she desires beyond the child; the child thus seeks to identify with this object.
The phallus is not a fantasy, if by that we mean an Oedipus complex and the [[Castration Complex]] involve the renunciation of this attempt to be the [[Imaginary]] effectphallus. Nor is it
as such an object The [[Imaginary]] phallus is written 9 (partlower-, internal, good, bad, etc.case phi). It is even less the organin Lacanian algebra, penis or clitoris, that it symbolises. . . . The phallus is a signifier. . . . It is the signifier intended to designate as a whole the effects of the signifiedwhich also represents phallic signification.
(E, 285)
Whereas the [[Castration Complex]] and the Oedipus complex revolve around theis written -e (minus lower-case phi).
[[Imaginary]] phallus, the question of sexual difference revolves around the
==The [[Symbolic]] phallus==
The [[Imaginary]] phallus which circulates between mother and child serves to institute the first dialectic in the child's life, which, although it is an [[Imaginary]] dialectic, already paves the way towards the [[Symbolic]], since an [[Imaginary]] element is circulated in much the same way a signifier (the phallus becomes an '[[Imaginary]] signifier').
Thus Lacan's formulations on the [[Imaginary]] phallus in the seminar of 1956-7 are accompanied by statements that the phallus is also a [[Symbolic]] object<ref>S4, 152</ref> and that the phallus is a signifier.<ref>S4, 191</ref>
concludes The idea thatthe phallus is a signifier is taken up again and further developed in the 1957-8 seminar and becomes the principle element of Lacan's theory of the phallus thereafter; the phallus is described as 'the signifier of the desire of the Other', by articulating this with phallocentrism<ref>E, Lacan has created a290</ref> and the signifier of jouissance.<ref>E, 320</ref>
These arguments are stated in their most definitive form in Lacan's paper on 'The signification of the phallus'.<ref>Lacan, 1958c</ref> The phallus is not a fantasy, if by that we mean an [[Imaginary]] effect. Nor is it as such an object (part-, internal, good, bad, etc.). It is even less the organ, penis or clitoris, that it symbolises. . . . The phallus is a signifier. . . . It is the signifier intended to designate as a whole the effects of the signified.<ref>E, 285</ref> Whereas the [[Castration Complex]] and the Oedipus complex revolve around the [[Imaginary]] phallus, the question of sexual difference revolves around the concludes that, by articulating this with phallocentrism, Lacan has created a phallogocentric system of thought.
You're An Abominable Erection! You Demand To Be Raised To The Level Of Signifier, But You Need To Be Veiled, To Hide What You Haven't Got! Wouldn't You Like It Both Ways! But By Making The Woman Rigid, You Make Her Frigid! Humph! You're Only So Much Meat!
==References==</references>
[[Category:Sexuality]]
