Difference between revisions of "Lack"
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Top}}manque{{Bottom}} | {{Top}}manque{{Bottom}} | ||
− | + | ==Translator's Note== | |
+ | "''Manque''" is translated here as "lack", except in the expression, created by [[Lacan]], "''manque-à-être''", for which [[Lacan]] himself has proposed the [[English]] neologism "[[want]]-to-be". | ||
− | + | ==Lack and Desire== | |
+ | The term "[[lack]]" is always related, in [[Lacan]]'s teaching, to [[desire]]. It is a [[lack]] which causes [[desire]] to arise.<ref>{{S8}} p. 139</ref> However, the precise [[nature]] of what is [[lack]]ing varies over the course of [[Lacan]]'s [[Works of Jacques Lacan|work]]. | ||
− | + | ==Lack of Being== | |
+ | When the term first appears, in 1955, [[lack]] designates first and foremost a [[lack|lack of being]]. What is [[desire]]d is [[being]] itself. | ||
− | + | <blockquote>Desire is a relation of being to lack. The lack is the lack of being properly [[speaking]]. It isn't the lack of this or that, but lack of being whereby the being [[exists]]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 223</ref></blockquote> | |
− | + | [[Lacan]] returns to this theme in 1958, when he argues that [[desire]] is the [[metonymy]] of the [[lack|lack of being]] (''[[lack|manque à être]]'').<ref>{{E}} p. 259; translated by [[Sheridan]] as "want-to-be"</ref> The [[subject]]'s [[lack|lack of being]] is "the heart of the [[analytic]] [[experience]]" and "the very field in which the [[neurotic]]'s [[passion]] is deployed.<ref>{{E}} p. 251</ref> [[Lacan]] contrasts the [[lack|lack of being]], which relates to [[desire]], with the [[lack|lack of having]] (''[[lack|manque à avoir]]''), which relates to [[demand]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 730</ref> | |
− | + | ==Lack of an Object== | |
− | + | In 1956, [[lack]] comes to designate the [[lack]] of an [[object]]. [[Lacan]] distinguishes between [[three]] kinds of [[lack]], according to the nature of the [[object]] which is [[lack]]ing, as shown in the [[figure]] below.<ref>{{S4}} p. 269</ref> | |
− | + | <!-- In the [[child]] as in the [[adult]], the lack of the object can appear in three specific modes: frustration, privation, and castration. In each of these three cases there is lack of the object, but in each [[case]] the nature of the lack is qualitatively different. The same is [[true]] of the type of object in question. --> | |
− | + | {| style="width:85%; height:200px" border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |
− | [[ | + | |+ '''[[:Image:Lacan-threelacks.jpg|Table of three types of lack of object]]'''<BR> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [[ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | In | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | {| style="width: | ||
− | |+ [[:Image:Lacan-threelacks.jpg|Table of three types of lack of object]]<BR> | ||
! align="center" | AGENT !! align="center" | LACK !! align="center" | OBJECT | ! align="center" | AGENT !! align="center" | LACK !! align="center" | OBJECT | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 43: | Line 33: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | Of these three forms of [[lack]], [[castration]] is the most important from the point of view of [[treatment|analytic experience]], and the term "[[lack]]" tends to become synonymous with [[castration]]. | ||
− | + | In 1957, when [[Lacan]] introduces the [[algebraic]] [[symbol]] for the [[bar]]red [[Other]] (<strike>A</strike>), [[lack]] comes to designate the [[lack]] of a [[signifier]] in the [[Other]]. [[Lacan]] introduces the [[symbol]] '''S(<strike>A</strike>)''' to designate "the signifier of a lack in the Other." No matter how many [[signifier]]s one adds to the [[signifying chain]], the [[chain]] is always [[lack|incomplete]]; it always [[lack]]s the [[signifier]] that could complete it. This "[[lack|missing signifier]]" (written '''-1''' in [[Lacan]]ian [[algebra]]) is constitutive of the [[subject]]. | |
− | |||
− | In 1957, when [[Lacan]] introduces the [[algebraic]] [[symbol]] for the [[bar]]red [[Other]] (<strike>A</strike>), [[lack]] comes to designate the [[lack]] of a [[signifier]] in the [[Other]]. | ||
− | |||
− | [[Lacan]] introduces the [[symbol]] '''S(<strike>A</strike>)''' to designate "the signifier of a lack in the Other." | ||
− | |||
− | No matter how many [[signifier]]s one adds to the [[signifying chain]], the [[chain]] is always incomplete; it always [[lack]]s the [[signifier]] that | ||
− | |||
− | This "missing signifier" (written -1 in [[Lacan]]ian [[algebra]]) is constitutive of the [[subject]]. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{See}} | ||
+ | * [[Algebra]] | ||
+ | * [[Desire]] | ||
* [[Being]] | * [[Being]] | ||
+ | || | ||
* [[Castration]] | * [[Castration]] | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Object]] |
* [[Phallus]] | * [[Phallus]] | ||
+ | || | ||
* [[Privation]] | * [[Privation]] | ||
− | + | * [[Signifier]] | |
+ | * [[Signifying chain]] | ||
+ | {{Also}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
+ | <div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small"> | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
− | + | {{OK}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Category:Language]] | [[Category:Language]] | ||
[[Category:Symbolic]] | [[Category:Symbolic]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Imaginary]] |
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Real]] |
+ | [[Category:Subject]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | __NOTOC__ |
Latest revision as of 00:04, 26 May 2019
Translator's Note
"Manque" is translated here as "lack", except in the expression, created by Lacan, "manque-à-être", for which Lacan himself has proposed the English neologism "want-to-be".
Lack and Desire
The term "lack" is always related, in Lacan's teaching, to desire. It is a lack which causes desire to arise.[1] However, the precise nature of what is lacking varies over the course of Lacan's work.
Lack of Being
When the term first appears, in 1955, lack designates first and foremost a lack of being. What is desired is being itself.
Desire is a relation of being to lack. The lack is the lack of being properly speaking. It isn't the lack of this or that, but lack of being whereby the being exists."[2]
Lacan returns to this theme in 1958, when he argues that desire is the metonymy of the lack of being (manque à être).[3] The subject's lack of being is "the heart of the analytic experience" and "the very field in which the neurotic's passion is deployed.[4] Lacan contrasts the lack of being, which relates to desire, with the lack of having (manque à avoir), which relates to demand.[5]
Lack of an Object
In 1956, lack comes to designate the lack of an object. Lacan distinguishes between three kinds of lack, according to the nature of the object which is lacking, as shown in the figure below.[6]
Of these three forms of lack, castration is the most important from the point of view of analytic experience, and the term "lack" tends to become synonymous with castration.
In 1957, when Lacan introduces the algebraic symbol for the barred Other (A), lack comes to designate the lack of a signifier in the Other. Lacan introduces the symbol S(A) to designate "the signifier of a lack in the Other." No matter how many signifiers one adds to the signifying chain, the chain is always incomplete; it always lacks the signifier that could complete it. This "missing signifier" (written -1 in Lacanian algebra) is constitutive of the subject.
See Also
References
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre VIII. Le transfert, 1960-61. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p. 139
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p. 223
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 259; translated by Sheridan as "want-to-be"
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 251
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 730
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d'objet, 19566-57. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p. 269