Difference between revisions of "Knowledge"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | knowledge | + | |
| − | + | "[[knowledge]]" ([[Fr]]. ''[[connaissance]]''/''[[savoir]]'') | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | [[Lacan]] distinguishes between two types of [[knowledge]]: | |
| − | and | + | * [[imaginary]] [[knowledge]] (''connaissance'') which is the [[knowledge]] of the [[ego]], and |
| − | + | * [[symbolic]] [[knowledge]] (''savoir''), which is the [[knowledge]] of the [[subject]]. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ''Savoir'' is the kind of [[knowledge]] which [[psychoanalytic treatment]] aims at. | |
| − | in the | + | |
| − | + | It is both [[knowledge]] of the [[subject]]'s relation to the [[symbolic]] [[order]], and also that relation itself. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | This [[knowledge]] is the articulation of [[signifier]]s in the [[subject]]'s [[symbolic]] universe, the [[signifying chain]] (S2). | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | The [[unconscious]] is simply another name for [[symbolic]] [[knowledge]] insofar as it is an "unknown knowledge," a [[knowledge]] which the [[subject]] does not know it knows. | |
| − | of the | + | |
| − | of | + | [[Psychoanalytic treatment]] aims at a progressive revelation of this [[knowledge]] to the [[subject]], and is based on the premise that theonly menas of access to this [[knowledge]] is via a particular form of [[speech]] called [[free association]]. |
| − | of the | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | However, [[psychoanalytic treatment]] does not aim at a [[Hegel]]ian '[[absolute knowledge]],' because the [[unconscious]] is irreducible; there is an inescapable division between the [[subject]] and [[knowledge]]. | |
| − | + | ||
| + | [[Symbolic]] [[knowledge]] is [[knowledge]] of the [[truth]] about one's [[unconscious]] [[desire]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Knowledge]] in this sense is a form of ''[[jouissance]]'': "[[knowledge]] is the ''[[jouissance]]'' of the [[Other]]."<ref>{{S17}} p.13</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Symbolic]] [[knowledge]] does not reside in any particular [[subject]], nor in the [[Other]] (which is not a [[subject]] but a locus), but is [[intersubjective]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, this does not prevent one supposing that somewhere there is a [[subject]] who possesses this [[symbolic]] [[knowledge]] (the [[subject supposed to know]]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Connaissance== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Connaissance'' (and its necessary correlate, ''meconnaissance'') is the kind of self-[[knowledge]] that belongs to the [[imaginary]] [[order]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is by misunderstanding and misrecognition (''meconnaissance'') that the [[subject]] comes to the [[imaginary]] [[knowledge]] of himself (''me-connsaissance'') which is constitutive of the [[ego]].<ref>{{E}} p.306</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[ego]] is thus an [[illusory]] kind of self-[[knowledge]] based on a [[fantasy]] of self-[[mastery]] and [[unity]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Imaginary]] [[knowledge]] is called "[[paranoiac]] [[knowledge]]" by [[Lacan]] because it has the same [[structure]] as [[paranoia]] (both involve a [[delusion]] of [[absolute knowledge]] and [[mastery]]), and because one of the preconditions of all [[human]] [[knowledge]] is the "paranoiac alienation of the ego."<ref>{{E}} p.2; Lacan, 1951b: 12</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Imaginary]] [[knowledge]] is an obstacle which hinders the [[subject]]s access to [[symbolic]] [[knowledge]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Psychoanalytic treatment]] must therefore continually subvert the [[subject]]'s [[imaginary]]] self-[[knowledge]] in order to reveal the [[symbolic]] self-[[knowledge]] which it blocks. | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Dictionary]] | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 4 August 2006
"knowledge" (Fr. connaissance/savoir)
Lacan distinguishes between two types of knowledge:
- imaginary knowledge (connaissance) which is the knowledge of the ego, and
- symbolic knowledge (savoir), which is the knowledge of the subject.
Savoir is the kind of knowledge which psychoanalytic treatment aims at.
It is both knowledge of the subject's relation to the symbolic order, and also that relation itself.
This knowledge is the articulation of signifiers in the subject's symbolic universe, the signifying chain (S2).
The unconscious is simply another name for symbolic knowledge insofar as it is an "unknown knowledge," a knowledge which the subject does not know it knows.
Psychoanalytic treatment aims at a progressive revelation of this knowledge to the subject, and is based on the premise that theonly menas of access to this knowledge is via a particular form of speech called free association.
However, psychoanalytic treatment does not aim at a Hegelian 'absolute knowledge,' because the unconscious is irreducible; there is an inescapable division between the subject and knowledge.
Symbolic knowledge is knowledge of the truth about one's unconscious desire.
Knowledge in this sense is a form of jouissance: "knowledge is the jouissance of the Other."[1]
Symbolic knowledge does not reside in any particular subject, nor in the Other (which is not a subject but a locus), but is intersubjective.
However, this does not prevent one supposing that somewhere there is a subject who possesses this symbolic knowledge (the subject supposed to know).
Connaissance
Connaissance (and its necessary correlate, meconnaissance) is the kind of self-knowledge that belongs to the imaginary order.
It is by misunderstanding and misrecognition (meconnaissance) that the subject comes to the imaginary knowledge of himself (me-connsaissance) which is constitutive of the ego.[2]
The ego is thus an illusory kind of self-knowledge based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity.
Imaginary knowledge is called "paranoiac knowledge" by Lacan because it has the same structure as paranoia (both involve a delusion of absolute knowledge and mastery), and because one of the preconditions of all human knowledge is the "paranoiac alienation of the ego."[3]
Imaginary knowledge is an obstacle which hinders the subjects access to symbolic knowledge.
Psychoanalytic treatment must therefore continually subvert the subject's imaginary] self-knowledge in order to reveal the symbolic self-knowledge which it blocks.
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre XVII. L'envers de la psychanalyse, 19669-70. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.13
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.306
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.2; Lacan, 1951b: 12
