Difference between revisions of "End of analysis"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(79 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
end of analysis (fin d'analyse)                       
+
{{Top}}fin d'[[analyse]]{{Bottom}}
  
−
In 'Analysis Terminable and Interminable', Freud discusses the question of whether it is                  ever possible to conclude  an analysis,   or whether all analyses      are necessarily incomplete
+
==Sigmund Freud==
 +
In ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'', [[Freud]] asks:
 +
<blockquote>"Is there such a [[thing]] as a [[natural]] end to an analysis?"<ref>{{F}} ''[[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'', 1937. [[SE]] XXIII p.219</ref></blockquote>
  
−
(Freud, 1937c). Lacan's answer to this question is that it is indeed possible
+
==Jacques Lacan==
 +
[[Lacan]]'s answer is that [[psychoanalytic treatment]] is a [[progress|logical process]] with a beginning and an end-point, designated as the "[[end of analysis]]".
  
−
  to speak of concluding      an analysis. Although not all analyses are carried
+
===Aim===
 +
The [[end of analysis|''end'' of analysis]] must be distinguished from the ''[[End of analysis|aim]]'' of [[psychoanalytic treatment]].
  
−
through to their conclusion, analytic treatment is a logical process which has
+
The [[end of analysis|aim]] of [[treatment]] is to lead the [[analysand]] to articulate the '''[[truth]]''' [[about]] his or her [[desire]].
  
−
  an end, and Lacan designates this end-point by the term 'end of analysis'.
+
While not all [[treatment|analyses]] are carried through to their [[progress|conclusion]], any [[treatment|analysis]] -- however incomplete -- may be regarded as successful when it achieves this [[end of analysis|aim]].  
  
−
      Given that many analyses      are broken off before the end of analysis is
+
The question of the [[end of analysis]] is therefore something more than whether a [[treatment|course]] of [[treatment|analytic treatment]] has or has not achieved its aim; it is a question of whether or not the [[treatment]] has reached its [[logical]] [[End of analysis|end-point]].
  
−
reached, the question arises as to whether such analyses can be considered
+
===Definition===
 +
[[Lacan]] conceives of this [[End of analysis|end-point]] in various ways.
  
−
  succesful or not. To answer this question it is necessary to distinguish between
+
:1. In the early 1950s, [[Lacan]] describes the [[end of analysis]] as "the advent of a [[true]] [[speech]] and the realization by the [[subject]] of his [[history]]" -- that is, as coming to [[terms]] with one's own [[death|mortality]].<ref>{{E}} p. 88</ref>
  
−
  the end of analysis and the aim of psychoanalytic treatment. The aim of
+
:<blockquote>"The [[subject]] ... begins the analysis by [[speaking]] about himself without speaking to you, or by speaking to you without speaking about himself. When he can [[speak]] to you about himself, the analysis will be over."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 373, n. 1</ref></blockquote>
  
−
psychoanalytic treatment is to lead the analysand to articulate the truth about
+
:2. In 1960, [[Lacan]] describes the [[end of analysis]] as a [[state]] of [[anxiety]] and [[anxiety|abandonment]] -- that is, as a state of [[helplessness]].
  
−
  his desire. Any analysis, however incomplete, may be regarded as successful
+
:3. In 1964, [[Lacan]] describes the [[end of analysis]] as the point when the [[analysand]] "traverses the radical [[fantasy]]."<ref>{{S11}} p. 273</ref>
  
−
    when it achieves this aim. The question of the end of analysis is therefore
+
:4. In the final decade of his teaching, [[Lacan]] describes the [[end of analysis]] as an "[[identification]] with the ''[[sinthome]]''."
  
−
something more than whether a course of analytic treatment has or has not
+
====Position of Analysand and Analyst====
 +
In general, the [[end of analysis]] involves two fundamental changes in the respective [[discourse|subjective positions]] of  
  
−
    achieved its aim; it is a question of whether or not the treatment has reached its
+
* the [[analysand]] -- the "[[subjective destitution]]" of the [[analysand]], and
  
−
logical end-point.
+
* the [[analyst]] -- the "[[loss of being]]" ([[French]]: ''[[désêtre]]'') of the [[analyst]].
  
−
      Lacan conceives of this end-point in various ways.
+
The [[analyst]] is reduced -- from the [[discourse|position]] of the [[subject-supposed-to-know]] -- to a mere [[surplus]], a [[objet petit a]], the [[cause]] of the [[analysand]]'s [[desire]].
  
 +
====Passage from Analysand to Analyst====
 +
For [[Lacan]], the [[end of analysis]] is also the passage from [[analysand]] to [[analyst]] -- for all [[psychoanalysts]] must undergo [[analytic treatment]] from beginning to end before [[being]] allowed to [[practice]] as [[analysts]].
  
 +
Since [[Lacan]] argues that all [[psychoanalysts]] should have experienced the [[process]] of [[analytic treatment]] from beginning to end, the [[end of analysis]] is also the passage from [[analysand]] to [[analyst]].
  
 +
<blockquote>"The true termination of an analysis" is therefore no more and no less than that which "prepares you to become an analyst."<ref>{{S7}} p. 303</ref></blockquote>
  
 +
===Misconceptions===
 +
====Identification with the Analyst====
 +
[[Lacan]] criticizes those [[psychoanalysts]] who describe the [[end of analysis]] in terms of [[identification]] with the [[analyst]].
  
−
      l. In the early 1950s, the end of analysis is described as 'the advent of a true
+
For [[Lacan]], it is not only possible, but necessary to go beyond [[identification]], for otherwise it is not [[psychoanalysis]] but [[suggestion]] -- which is the antithesis of [[psychoanalysis]].
  
−
speech and the realisation by the subject of his history' (E, 88) (see SPEECH).
+
====Transference====
 +
[[Lacan]] also criticizes those [[psychoanalysts]] who describe the [[end of analysis]] in terms of "liquidation" of the [[transference]].
  
−
'The subject      . . . begins the analysis by speaking about himself without
+
For [[Lacan]], this erroneous view is based on a misunderstanding of [[transference]] -- as a kind of [[illusion]] which can be transcended -- which overlooks the [[symbolic]] [[nature]] of [[transference]] -- as an essential [[structure]] of [[speech]].
  
−
speaking to you,       or by speaking to you without speaking about himself.
+
Although [[analytic treatment]] does involve the [[resolution]] of the [[particular]] ''[[transference|transference relationship]]'' established with the [[analyst]], [[transference]] itself still subsists after the [[end of analysis]].
  
−
When he can speak to you about himself, the analysis will be over' (Ec,
+
====Other Misconceptions====
 +
The [[end of analysis]] does not involve:
  
−
373, n. 1). The end of analysis is also described as coming to terms with
+
* the strengthening the [[ego]]
 +
* the [[adaptation]] to [[reality]]
 +
* the [[disappearance]] of the [[symptom]]
 +
* the [[cure]] of an underlying disease (e.g.''[[neurosis]]'')
  
−
one's own mortality (E, 104-5).
+
For [[Lacan]], [[analysis]] is not essentially a [[treatment|therapeutic process]] but rather a [[search]] for [[truth]] -- and the [[truth]] is not always beneficial.<ref>{{S17}} p. 122</ref>
  
−
      2. In 1960, Lacan describes the end of analysis as a state of anxiety and
+
==See Also==
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [[Analysand]]
 +
* [[Analyst]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Fantasy]]
 +
* [[Sinthome]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Speech]]
 +
* [[Subject]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Symptom]]
 +
* [[Transference]]
 +
{{Also}}
  
−
abandonment, and compares it to the HELPLESSNEss of the human infant.
+
==References==
 +
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
 +
<references/>
 +
</div>
 +
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 +
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Terms]]
 +
{{OK}}
  
−
      3. In 1964 he describes it as the point when the analysand has 'traversed the
+
__NOTOC__
−
 
 
−
radical fantasy' (Sll, 273) (see FANTASY).
 
−
 
 
−
      4. In the last decade of his teaching, he describes the end of analysis as
 
−
 
 
−
'identification with the sinthome', and          as 'knowing what to do with the
 
−
 
 
−
sinthome' (see SINTHOME).
 
−
 
 
−
      Common to all these formulations is the idea that the end of analysis
 
−
 
 
−
involves a change in the subjective position of the analysand (the analysand's
 
−
 
 
−
'subjective destitution'), and a corresponding change in the position of the
 
−
 
 
−
analyst (the loss of being [Fr. dÈsÍtre] of the analyst, the fall of the analyst
 
−
 
 
−
from the position of the subject-supposed-to-know). At the end of the analysis,
 
−
 
 
−
the analyst is reduced to a mere surplus, a pure objet petit a, the cause of the
 
−
 
 
−
analysand's desire.
 
−
 
 
−
      Since Lacan argues that all psychoanalysts should have experienced the
 
−
 
 
−
process of analytic treatment from beginning to end, the end of analysis is
 
−
 
 
−
also the passage from analysand to analyst. 'The true termination of an
 
−
 
 
−
analysis' is therefore no more and no less than that which 'prepares you to
 
−
 
 
−
become an analyst' (S7, 303).
 
−
 
 
−
      In 1967, Lacan introduced the procedure of the PAss as a means of testifying
 
−
 
 
−
  to the end of one's analysis. By means of this procedure, Lacan hoped to avoid
 
−
 
 
−
the dangers of regarding the end of analysis as a quasi-mystical, ineffable
 
−
 
 
−
experience. Such a view is antithetical to psychoanalysis, which is all about
 
−
 
 
−
putting things into words.
 
−
 
 
−
      Lacan criticises those psychoanalysts who have seen the end of analysis in
 
−
 
 
−
  terms of identification with the analyst. In opposition to this view of psycho-
 
−
 
 
−
analysis, Lacan states that the 'crossing of the plane of identification is
 
−
 
 
−
possible' (Sll, 273). Not only is it possible to go beyond identification, but
 
−
 
 
−
it is necessary, for otherwise it is not psychoanalysis but suggestion, which is
 
−
 
 
−
the antithesis of psychoanalysis; 'the fundamental mainspring of the analytic
 
−
 
 
−
operation is the maintenance of the distance between the I        - identification  -
 
−
 
 
−
and the a' (S11, 273).
 
−
 
 
−
      Lacan also rejects the idea that the end of analysis involves the 'liquidation'
 
−
 
 
−
of the transference (see S11, 267). The idea that the transference              can be
 
−
 
 
−
'liquidated' is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of the transference,
 
−
 
 
−
according to which the transference is viewed as a kind of illusion which can
 
−
 
 
−
be transcended. Such a view is erroneous because it entirely overlooks the
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
symbolic nature of the transference; transference is part of the essential
 
−
 
 
−
  structure of speech. Although analytic treatment involves the resolution of
 
−
 
 
−
the particular transference relationship established with the analyst, transfer-
 
−
 
 
−
  ence itself still subsists after the end of analysis.
 
−
 
 
−
      Other misconceptions of the end of analysis which Lacan rejects              are:
 
−
 
 
−
'strengthening the ego', 'adaptation to reality' and 'happiness'. The end of
 
−
 
 
−
analysis is not the disappearance of the symptom, nor the cure of an underlying
 
−
 
 
−
disease (e.g. neurosis), since analysis is not essentially a therapeutic process
 
−
 
 
−
but a search for truth, and the truth is not always beneficial (Sl7, 122).
 
−
== def ==
 
−
 
 
−
Lacan conceives of this end-point in various ways.
 
−
 
 
−
1.  In the early 1950s, the end of anlaysis is described as "the advent of a true speech and the realization by the subject of his history."<ref>E 88</ref>(See [[Speech]])
 
−
 
 
−
"The subject ... begins the analysis by speaking about himslef without speaking to you, or by speaking to you without speaking about himself.  When he can speak to you about himself, the analysis will be over."<ref> Ec 373, n. 1</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
The end of analysis is also described as coming to terms with one's own mortality.<ref>E 104-5</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
2.  In 1960 Lacan describes the end of analysis as a state of anxiety and abandonment, and copares it to the [[helplessness]] of the human infant.
 
−
 
 
−
3.  In 1964 he describes it as the point when the analysand has "traversed the radical fantasy."<ref>S11, 273</ref> (See [[Fantasy]])
 
−
 
 
−
4. In the last decade of his teaching, he describes the end of analysis as "identification with the ''sinthome'', and as "knowing what to do with the ''sinthome'. (See ''[[Sinthome]]'')
 
−
 
 
−
Common to all these formulations is the idea that the end of analysis involves a change in the subjective position of the analysand (the analysand's "[[subjective destitution]]"), and a corresponding change in the position of the analyst (the loss of being [Fr. ''désêtre''] of the analyst, the fall of the analyst from the position of the subect-supposed-to-know). 
 
−
 
 
−
at the end of the analysis, the analyst is reduced to a mere surplus, a pure ''objet petit a'', the cause of the analysand's desire.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Since Lacan argues that all psychoanalysts should have experienced the process of analytic treatment form beginning to end, the end of analysis is also the passage from analysand to analyst.
 
−
 
 
−
'the true termination of an analysis" is therefore no more and no less than that which "prepares you to become ann analyst."<ref>S7 303</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
In 1967 Lacan introduced the procedure of the [[Pass]] as a means of testifying to the end of one's analysis.
 
−
 
 
−
By means of this procedure, Lacan hoped to avoid the dangers of regarding the end of analysis as a quasi-mystical, ineffable experience. 
 
−
 
 
−
Such a view is antithetical to psychoanalysi, which is all about putting things into words.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Lacan criticizes those psychoanalysts who have seen the end of analysis in terms of identification with the analyst.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
54
 

Latest revision as of 06:33, 24 May 2019

French: [[fin d'analyse]]

Sigmund Freud

In Analysis Terminable and Interminable, Freud asks:

"Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?"[1]

Jacques Lacan

Lacan's answer is that psychoanalytic treatment is a logical process with a beginning and an end-point, designated as the "end of analysis".

Aim

The end of analysis must be distinguished from the aim of psychoanalytic treatment.

The aim of treatment is to lead the analysand to articulate the truth about his or her desire.

While not all analyses are carried through to their conclusion, any analysis -- however incomplete -- may be regarded as successful when it achieves this aim.

The question of the end of analysis is therefore something more than whether a course of analytic treatment has or has not achieved its aim; it is a question of whether or not the treatment has reached its logical end-point.

Definition

Lacan conceives of this end-point in various ways.

1. In the early 1950s, Lacan describes the end of analysis as "the advent of a true speech and the realization by the subject of his history" -- that is, as coming to terms with one's own mortality.[2]

"The subject ... begins the analysis by speaking about himself without speaking to you, or by speaking to you without speaking about himself. When he can speak to you about himself, the analysis will be over."[3]

2. In 1960, Lacan describes the end of analysis as a state of anxiety and abandonment -- that is, as a state of helplessness.
3. In 1964, Lacan describes the end of analysis as the point when the analysand "traverses the radical fantasy."[4]
4. In the final decade of his teaching, Lacan describes the end of analysis as an "identification with the sinthome."

Position of Analysand and Analyst

In general, the end of analysis involves two fundamental changes in the respective subjective positions of

The analyst is reduced -- from the position of the subject-supposed-to-know -- to a mere surplus, a objet petit a, the cause of the analysand's desire.

Passage from Analysand to Analyst

For Lacan, the end of analysis is also the passage from analysand to analyst -- for all psychoanalysts must undergo analytic treatment from beginning to end before being allowed to practice as analysts.

Since Lacan argues that all psychoanalysts should have experienced the process of analytic treatment from beginning to end, the end of analysis is also the passage from analysand to analyst.

"The true termination of an analysis" is therefore no more and no less than that which "prepares you to become an analyst."[5]

Misconceptions

Identification with the Analyst

Lacan criticizes those psychoanalysts who describe the end of analysis in terms of identification with the analyst.

For Lacan, it is not only possible, but necessary to go beyond identification, for otherwise it is not psychoanalysis but suggestion -- which is the antithesis of psychoanalysis.

Transference

Lacan also criticizes those psychoanalysts who describe the end of analysis in terms of "liquidation" of the transference.

For Lacan, this erroneous view is based on a misunderstanding of transference -- as a kind of illusion which can be transcended -- which overlooks the symbolic nature of transference -- as an essential structure of speech.

Although analytic treatment does involve the resolution of the particular transference relationship established with the analyst, transference itself still subsists after the end of analysis.

Other Misconceptions

The end of analysis does not involve:

For Lacan, analysis is not essentially a therapeutic process but rather a search for truth -- and the truth is not always beneficial.[6]

See Also

References

  1. ↑ Freud, Sigmund. Analysis Terminable and Interminable, 1937. SE XXIII p.219
  2. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 88
  3. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 373, n. 1
  4. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 273
  5. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 303
  6. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre XVII. L'envers de la psychanalyse, 19669-70. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p. 122


Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/index.php?title=End_of_analysis&oldid=45408"