Difference between revisions of "Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{BBAB}}
 +
 
[[File:Ethics- An Essay on the Understanding of Evil.jpg|thumb]]
 
[[File:Ethics- An Essay on the Understanding of Evil.jpg|thumb]]
  
 
==Book Description==
 
==Book Description==
One of the most powerful voices in contemporary French philosophy explodes the facile assumptions behind the recent ethical turn.
+
One of the most powerful voices in contemporary [[French]] [[philosophy]] explodes the facile assumptions behind the [[recent]] [[ethical]] turn.
  
Ethical questions dominate current political and academic agendas. While government think-tanks ponder the dilemmas of bio-ethics, medical ethics and professional ethics, respect for human rights and reverence for the Other have become matters of broad consensus.
+
Ethical questions dominate current [[political]] and academic agendas. While [[government]] [[think]]-tanks ponder the dilemmas of bio-[[ethics]], medical ethics and professional ethics, respect for [[human]] rights and reverence for the [[Other]] have become matters of broad consensus.
  
Alain Badiou, one of the most powerful voices in contemporary French philosophy, explodes the facile assumptions behind this recent ethical turn. He shows how our prevailing ethical principles serve ultimately to reinforce an ideology of the status quo, and fail to provide a framework for an effective understanding of the concept of evil.
+
[[Alain]] [[Badiou]], one of the most powerful voices in contemporary French philosophy, explodes the facile assumptions behind this recent ethical turn. He shows how our prevailing ethical principles serve ultimately to reinforce an [[ideology]] of the status quo, and fail to provide a framework for an effective [[understanding]] of the [[concept]] of [[evil]].
  
In contrast, Badiou summons up an “ethic of truths” which is designed both to sustain and inspire a disciplined, subjective adherence to a militant cause (be it political or scientific, artistic or romantic), and to discern a finely demarcated zone of application for the concept of evil. He defends an effectively super-human integrity over the respect for merely human rights, asserts a partisan universality over the negotiation of merely particular interests, and appeals to an “immortal” value beyond the protection of mortal privileges.
+
In contrast, Badiou summons up an “[[ethic]] of truths” which is designed both to sustain and inspire a disciplined, [[subjective]] adherence to a militant [[cause]] (be it political or [[scientific]], artistic or romantic), and to discern a finely demarcated zone of application for the concept of evil. He [[defends]] an effectively super-human integrity over the respect for merely [[human rights]], asserts a partisan [[universality]] over the negotiation of merely [[particular]] interests, and appeals to an “immortal” [[value]] beyond the protection of mortal privileges.

Latest revision as of 06:49, 24 May 2019

Books by Alain Badiou

Ethics- An Essay on the Understanding of Evil.jpg

Book Description

One of the most powerful voices in contemporary French philosophy explodes the facile assumptions behind the recent ethical turn.

Ethical questions dominate current political and academic agendas. While government think-tanks ponder the dilemmas of bio-ethics, medical ethics and professional ethics, respect for human rights and reverence for the Other have become matters of broad consensus.

Alain Badiou, one of the most powerful voices in contemporary French philosophy, explodes the facile assumptions behind this recent ethical turn. He shows how our prevailing ethical principles serve ultimately to reinforce an ideology of the status quo, and fail to provide a framework for an effective understanding of the concept of evil.

In contrast, Badiou summons up an “ethic of truths” which is designed both to sustain and inspire a disciplined, subjective adherence to a militant cause (be it political or scientific, artistic or romantic), and to discern a finely demarcated zone of application for the concept of evil. He defends an effectively super-human integrity over the respect for merely human rights, asserts a partisan universality over the negotiation of merely particular interests, and appeals to an “immortal” value beyond the protection of mortal privileges.