Difference between revisions of "Imaginary identification"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Jacques Lacan differentiated between an imaginary identification, that forms the ego from a symbolic one that founds the subject. He discussed the first in his essay on the "Mirror Stage" (1936) and he examined the second primarily in his seminar on [[Identification]] (1961-1962).
+
Jacques [[Lacan]] differentiated between an [[imaginary]] identification, that forms the ego from a [[symbolic]] one that founds the [[subject]]. He discussed the first in his essay on the "[[Mirror]] [[Stage]]" (1936) and he examined the second primarily in his [[seminar]] on [[Identification]] (1961-1962).
  
Imaginary identification involves the image of one's "fellow being." Before the subject develops the proper neurological connection, he grasps the unity of his body image by identifying with the image of the other, the ideal ego. Thus the subject escapes the feeling of having a fragmented body. The mirror stage is also the source of the aggressive tension that characterizes relations with the one's fellow being, and it is the source of desire as the other's.
+
Imaginary identification involves the [[image]] of one's "fellow [[being]]." Before the subject develops the proper neurological connection, he grasps the [[unity]] of his [[body]] image by [[identifying]] with the image of the [[other]], the [[ideal]] ego. Thus the subject escapes the [[feeling]] of having a [[fragmented body]]. [[The mirror stage]] is also the source of the [[aggressive]] tension that characterizes relations with the one's fellow being, and it is the source of [[desire]] as the other's.
  
Symbolic identification, or "signifier identification," involves an ideal signifier—an insignia of the Other or a unary trait—as the nucleus of the ego-ideal that the subject depends on.
+
[[Symbolic identification]], or "[[signifier]] identification," involves an ideal signifier—an insignia of the Other or a [[unary]] trait—as the nucleus of the [[ego-ideal]] that the subject depends on.
  
This situation is modeled on Freud's second form of identification, that is, an identification by adopting a single trait taken from the object. In fact, imaginary identification depends on symbolic identification. In the mirror stage, the infant looks for a sign from the maternal Other holding him up to the mirror in order to confirm that the image is his. Behind the signifier of the ego-ideal are the Name-of-the-Father and the symbolic phallus.
+
This [[situation]] is modeled on [[Freud]]'s second [[form]] of identification, that is, an identification by adopting a single [[trait]] taken from the [[object]]. In fact, imaginary identification depends on symbolic identification. In the mirror stage, the [[infant]] looks for a [[sign]] from the [[maternal]] Other holding him up to the mirror in [[order]] to confirm that the image is his. Behind the signifier of the ego-ideal are the [[Name]]-of-the-[[Father]] and [[the symbolic]] [[phallus]].
  
A subject's sexual identity does not depend on his relation to an image, but on his position in relation to the symbolic phallus—a male subject has it, while the female subject does not have it, but is it.
+
A subject's [[sexual]] [[identity]] does not depend on his relation to an image, but on his [[position]] in relation to the symbolic phallus—a [[male]] subject has it, while the [[female]] subject does not have it, but is it.
  
In the last years of his Seminar lectures, Lacan introduced the idea of identification with a symptom and added it to the notions of imaginary and symbolic identification.
+
In the last years of his Seminar lectures, Lacan introduced the [[idea]] of identification with a [[symptom]] and added it to the notions of imaginary and symbolic identification.
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
Line 24: Line 24:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
# Lacan, Jacques. (2002). The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Écrits: A selection. (Bruce Fink, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1949).
+
# [[Lacan, Jacques]]. (2002). The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in [[psychoanalytic]] [[experience]]. In [[Écrits]]: A selection. ([[Bruce Fink]], Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original [[work]] published 1949).
# ——. Le Séminaire-Livre IX, L'identification (1961-62). (unpublished seminar).
+
# ——. Le Séminaire-Livre IX, [[L'identification]] (1961-62). (unpublished seminar).
  
 
[[Category:New]]
 
[[Category:New]]

Latest revision as of 00:12, 25 May 2019

Jacques Lacan differentiated between an imaginary identification, that forms the ego from a symbolic one that founds the subject. He discussed the first in his essay on the "Mirror Stage" (1936) and he examined the second primarily in his seminar on Identification (1961-1962).

Imaginary identification involves the image of one's "fellow being." Before the subject develops the proper neurological connection, he grasps the unity of his body image by identifying with the image of the other, the ideal ego. Thus the subject escapes the feeling of having a fragmented body. The mirror stage is also the source of the aggressive tension that characterizes relations with the one's fellow being, and it is the source of desire as the other's.

Symbolic identification, or "signifier identification," involves an ideal signifier—an insignia of the Other or a unary trait—as the nucleus of the ego-ideal that the subject depends on.

This situation is modeled on Freud's second form of identification, that is, an identification by adopting a single trait taken from the object. In fact, imaginary identification depends on symbolic identification. In the mirror stage, the infant looks for a sign from the maternal Other holding him up to the mirror in order to confirm that the image is his. Behind the signifier of the ego-ideal are the Name-of-the-Father and the symbolic phallus.

A subject's sexual identity does not depend on his relation to an image, but on his position in relation to the symbolic phallus—a male subject has it, while the female subject does not have it, but is it.

In the last years of his Seminar lectures, Lacan introduced the idea of identification with a symptom and added it to the notions of imaginary and symbolic identification.

See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. (2002). The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Écrits: A selection. (Bruce Fink, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1949).
  2. ——. Le Séminaire-Livre IX, L'identification (1961-62). (unpublished seminar).