Changes

ENUNCIATION ==The Statement and the Enunciation==In [[linguistics]], one important distinction is that between the [[enunciation]] (''Enonciationenonciation'')and the [[statement]] (''enonce'').

In linguistics, one important distinction is that between the ===The Statement===The [[enunciationstatement]] (''enonciationenonce'') and refers to the actual [[statementwords]] (''enonce'')uttered.

The [[statement]] (''enonce'') refers to is analysed in terms of abstract grammar, independent of the actual [[words]] utteredspecific circumstances of occurrence. ===The Enunciation===

When linguistic production is analysed in terms of abstract grammatical units (such ==The Subject==[[Lacan]] designates the [[enunciation]] as sentences)[[unconscious]], independent of and affirms that the specific circumstances source of occurrence, it [[speech]] is referred to as a statement. On not the other hand[[ego]], when linguistic production is analysed as an individual act performed by a particular speaker at a specific time/placenor [[consciousness]], but the [[unconscious]]; [[language]] comes from the [[Other]], and in a specific situation, it the idea that '[[I]]' am [[master]] of my [[discourse]] is referred to as only an enunciation[[illusion]].

In 1936The very word '[[I]]' (''Je'') is ambiguous; as a [[shifter]], it is both a [[signifier]] acting as [[subject]] of the [[statement]], and an index which designates, but does not [[signify]], Lacan states that the act [[subject]] of speaking contains a meaning in itself, even if the actual words spoken are 'meaningless[[enunciation]].'<ref>Ec. p.83E, 298</ref>

The [[Speechsubject]]is thus [[split]] between these two levels, prior to any function it may have divided in 'conveying a message', is an appeal to the very act of articulating the "I" that presents the [[otherillusion]] of [[unity]].<ref>Sll, 139</ref>

==Examples=====Speech Act===Lacan focuses his attention on the dimension of the [[enunciation]], the [[act ]] of [[speaking ]] in itself, irrespective of the content of the utterance.

In 19461936, [[Lacan uses ]] states that the term 'enunciation' to describe strange characteristics [[act]] of psychotic languagespeaking contains a meaning in itself, with its 'duplicity of even if the enunciationactual words spoken are "meaningless.'"<ref>{{Ec, 167}} p.83</ref>

In the 1950s[[Speech]], prior to any function it may have in "conveying a message, the term " is used an appeal to locate the [[subject of the unconsciousother]].

===Psychosis===In 1946, Lacan uses the [[graph term 'enunciation' to describe strange characteristics of desire]], the lower [[chain]] is the [[statement]]psychotic language, which is [[speech]] in with its [[conscious]] dimension, while the upper [[chain]] is "duplicity of the [[unconscious]] [[enunciation]]."<ref>E, 316{{Ec}} p.167</ref>

[[Lacan]] designates ===Subject of the Unconscious===In the [[enunciation]] as u[[nconscious]]1950s, and affirms that the source of [[speech]] term is not used to locate the [[ego]], nor [[consciousness]], but subject of the [[unconscious]]; [[language]] comes from the [[Other]], and the idea that '[[I]]' am [[master]] of my [[discourse]] is only an [[illusion]].

The very word '===Graph of Desire===In the [[Igraph of desire]]' (''Je'') is ambiguous; as a , the lower [[shifterchain]], it is both a [[signifier]] acting as [[subject]] of the [[statement]], and an index which designates, but does not is [[signifyspeech]], the in its [[subjectconscious]] of dimension, while the upper [[enunciation]].<ref>E, 298</ref> The [[subjectchain]] is thus [[split]] between these two levels, divided in the very act of articulating the "I" that presents the [[illusionunconscious]] of [[unityenunciation]]."<ref>Sll, 139{{E}} p.316</ref>