Difference between revisions of "Seminar IX"
(fix table) |
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | In <i>[[Le transfert]]</i> [[Lacan]] describes [[symbolic]] [[identification]] as [[identification]] with the [[signifier]]. Here, he examines the rapport of the [[subject]] to the [[signifier]]. In the three types of [[identification]] isolated by [[Freud]] in <i>[[Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego]]</i> (1921, S.E. XVIII), he finds: | + | In <i>[[Le transfert]]</i> [[Lacan]] describes [[symbolic]] [[identification]] as [[identification]] with the [[signifier]]. Here, he examines the rapport of the [[subject]] to the [[signifier]]. In the [[three]] types of [[identification]] isolated by [[Freud]] in <i>[[Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego]]</i> (1921, S.E. XVIII), he finds: |
− | # A [[primitive]] [[identification]] with the [[father]] as such based on a single feature: the matrix of the Ideal-of-the-Ego, a symbolic [[introjection]] of the [[father]]'s mark, "An identity of body links the [[Father]] of all times to all those who descend from Him." | + | # A [[primitive]] [[identification]] with the [[father]] as such based on a single feature: the [[matrix]] of the [[Ideal]]-of-the-Ego, a symbolic [[introjection]] of the [[father]]'s mark, "An [[identity]] of body [[links]] the [[Father]] of all [[times]] to all those who descend from Him." |
− | # A [[regressive]] [[identification]] in [[love]] relations: the [[object]] refuses itself, therefore the [[subject]] identifies with the [[object]] (one centered around <i>[[objet a]]</i> and the [[phallus]]). | + | # A [[regressive]] [[identification]] in [[love]] relations: the [[object]] refuses itself, therefore the [[subject]] [[identifies]] with the [[object]] (one centered around <i>[[objet a]]</i> and the [[phallus]]). |
− | # An [[hysteric]]al [[identification]] where the [[subject]] recognizes in the other his global situation. | + | # An [[hysteric]]al [[identification]] where the [[subject]] recognizes in the [[other]] his [[global]] [[situation]]. |
− | By asserting the [[identification]] of the [[signifier]] and the [[identification]] with the [[signifier]], [[Lacan]] brings about a new category consisting in the first two and centered on the rapport to the [[Father]] and to the [[phallus]]. It becomes crucial to institute the [[subject]] in his rapport to the [[signifier]] - to the [[signifier]] alone. To mark the difference between the preverbal and the verbal [[Lacan]] points at his dog, Justine, who has speech but not language: insofar as she speaks, she never takes him for an other, she is not capable of [[transference]] and lives in the [[demand]]. In "[[The agency of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud]]" (<i>[[Écrits: A Selection]]</i>) he refers to the [[language]] of the [[affect]] and of the [[body]] as the "nonhuman" aspect of those who "do not have [[language]]." The only salvation lies in "the signifying identification" where the preverbal is articulated within the subject's relation to the word. | + | By asserting the [[identification]] of the [[signifier]] and the [[identification]] with the [[signifier]], [[Lacan]] brings [[about]] a new [[category]] consisting in the first two and centered on the rapport to the [[Father]] and to the [[phallus]]. It becomes crucial to institute the [[subject]] in his rapport to the [[signifier]] - to the [[signifier]] alone. To mark the [[difference]] between the preverbal and the [[verbal]] [[Lacan]] points at his dog, Justine, who has [[speech]] but not language: insofar as she speaks, she never takes him for an other, she is not capable of [[transference]] and lives in the [[demand]]. In "[[The agency of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud]]" (<i>[[Écrits: A Selection]]</i>) he refers to the [[language]] of the [[affect]] and of the [[body]] as the "nonhuman" aspect of those who "do not have [[language]]." The only salvation lies in "the signifying identification" where the preverbal is articulated within the subject's relation to the [[word]]. |
− | In "[[The agency of the letter]]..." the [[signifier]] is turned into an inscription in the [[unconscious]], a seal, which in <i>[[L'identification]]</i> becomes the "unbroken line," <i>[[trait unaire]]</i>, a [[symbolic]] term which is to produce the [[ego-ideal]]. Though this trait may originate as a [[sign]], it becomes a [[signifier]] when incorporated into a signifying system: [[identification]] raises the question of the identical. Can it be said that A = A? No, for there already is a difference due to repetition: hence A [[Image:lacansem1b2.gif]] A. Against the One of totality, [[Lacan]] institutes the 1 as the single mark, the unbroken line, made by mere repetition. The [[signifier]] has a unity only insofar as it is that which all the other ones are not, insofar as it is pure difference: the One as such is the Other. There is no tautology in expressions such as "war is war" or "Lacan is Lacan." The real thing has nothing to do with this, it is the same [[signifier]] that functions to connote pure difference, for, in [[repetition]], the [[signifier]] represents the [[subject]] for another [[signifier]] and not for some one. The [[identification]] of the [[signifier]] and the [[identification]] with the signfier closely mingle. Formal logic, the study of the proper name, the complex grammar of negation... everything works toward defining the unbroken line as "a return, the seizing of the origin of a counting before the number." The [[phallus]] as the [[symbolic]] mark is at the origin since "[[narcissism and incorporation should be located in the direction of the [[Father]] and not in the direction of the parasited mother's [[body]]." [[Lacan]]'s response to the problem of the origin (the chicken or the egg?) is the rooster, the [[signifier]] that makes the rooster, the letter or unbroken line. His project is to create "a [[topology|topological]] [[structure]] of the [[subject]]." | + | In "[[The agency of the letter]]..." the [[signifier]] is turned into an inscription in the [[unconscious]], a seal, which in <i>[[L'identification]]</i> becomes the "unbroken line," <i>[[trait unaire]]</i>, a [[symbolic]] term which is to produce the [[ego-ideal]]. Though this [[trait]] may originate as a [[sign]], it becomes a [[signifier]] when incorporated into a signifying [[system]]: [[identification]] raises the question of the identical. Can it be said that A = A? No, for there already is a difference due to repetition: hence A [[Image:lacansem1b2.gif]] A. Against the One of [[totality]], [[Lacan]] institutes the 1 as the single mark, the unbroken line, made by mere repetition. The [[signifier]] has a [[unity]] only insofar as it is that which all the other ones are not, insofar as it is pure difference: the One as such is the Other. There is no tautology in expressions such as "war is war" or "Lacan is Lacan." The [[real]] [[thing]] has [[nothing]] to do with this, it is the same [[signifier]] that functions to connote pure difference, for, in [[repetition]], the [[signifier]] represents the [[subject]] for [[another]] [[signifier]] and not for some one. The [[identification]] of the [[signifier]] and the [[identification]] with the signfier closely mingle. [[Formal]] [[logic]], the study of the proper [[name]], the [[complex]] grammar of [[negation]]... everything works toward defining the unbroken line as "a [[return]], the seizing of the origin of a counting before the [[number]]." The [[phallus]] as the [[symbolic]] mark is at the origin since "[[narcissism and incorporation should be located in the direction of the [[Father]] and not in the direction of the parasited [[mother]]'s [[body]]." [[Lacan]]'s response to the problem of the origin (the chicken or the egg?) is the rooster, the [[signifier]] that makes the rooster, the [[letter]] or unbroken line. His [[project]] is to create "a [[topology|topological]] [[structure]] of the [[subject]]." |
− | To whomever asks, "What is the [[truth]] of your [[discourse]]?", [[Lacan]] answers: "I am an [[analyst]], and as such, I have to to disappoint you, I don't tell the [[truth]] about [[truth]]." "I can take you very far on the path of the 'who am I' without the [[truth]] of what I am telling you being guaranteed, but nevertheless, in what I am telling you, it is still a matter of [[truth]]." | + | To whomever asks, "What is the [[truth]] of your [[discourse]]?", [[Lacan]] answers: "I am an [[analyst]], and as such, I have to to disappoint you, I don't tell the [[truth]] about [[truth]]." "I can take you very far on the path of the 'who am I' without the [[truth]] of what I am telling you [[being]] guaranteed, but nevertheless, in what I am telling you, it is still a matter of [[truth]]." |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
<b>Le séminaire, Livre IX: L'identification.</b><br> | <b>Le séminaire, Livre IX: L'identification.</b><br> | ||
− | French: unpublished.<br> | + | [[French]]: unpublished.<br> |
− | English: unpublished | + | [[English]]: unpublished |
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | {| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | {| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ||
− | |width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Paris: Seuil, 1977. 374 pages, Language: French, ISBN: 2020047276. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small> | + | |width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1977. 374 pages, Language: French, ISBN: 2020047276. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small> |
|} | |} | ||
--> | --> | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|11 avril 1962]] || [http://www.mediafire.com/file/i3aq9afpb42b884/1962.04.11.pdf/file link] | | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|11 avril 1962]] || [http://www.mediafire.com/file/i3aq9afpb42b884/1962.04.11.pdf/file link] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|02 mai 1962]] || [missing link] | + | | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | [[{{Y}}|02 mai 1962]] || [[[missing]] link] |
<!-- | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireIX/1962.05.02.pdf link] --> | <!-- | [http://{{archive}}/seminaireIX/1962.05.02.pdf link] --> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |}<!-- Start of right-column --> | + | |}<!-- Start of [[right]]-column --> |
|} | |} | ||
__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
[[Category:Seminars]] [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | [[Category:Seminars]] [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] |
Revision as of 22:52, 20 May 2019
Jacques Lacan's Seminars : I · II · III · IV · V · VI · VII · VIII · IX · X · XI · XII · XIII · XIV · XV · XVI · XVII · XVIII · XIX · XX · XXI · XXII · XXIII · XXIV · XXV · XXVI · |XXVII |
|